search.noResults

search.searching

saml.title
dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
Sportradar Integrity Services Nothing’s new under the sun in match-fixing


As we head into 2025, the integrity space in sports betting is poised to benefit from continued advances in AI and data analytics, making detection and prevention of match-fixing more efficient than ever. As the data ecosystem continues to grow and technology evolves, Sportradar’s approach will adapt explains Jack Kennedy, VP Anti-Match-Fixing, with a focus on not only improving betting market monitoring but also expanding its role in supporting intelligence gathering and enhancing regulatory compliance across the industry.


How is the integrity space changing as we head into 2025?


Te world of match-fixing is constantly evolving. Te challenge is to stay on top of the latest trends to ensure that, as a technology company, we are continually moving forward and have the correct data infrastructure and resources to keep up with the pace of advancement. Nothing's new under the sun in match-fixing. We often see the same characters popping up throughout the years, but adapting to changes in the landscape is always important. As we'll likely touch on later, there is an increased reliance on betting data from operators, so we need to continue building out those relationships and the information flow is key. Te biggest challenge is that, because of the confidentiality of ongoing investigations, sometimes it's difficult for operators to get feedback from sporting federations and that creates difficulties. Tese cases take time, they’re complex and you've got to ensure operators are understanding of the fact that their information being used to benefit these cases is behind closed doors for positive change.


What’s the ratio of suspicious activity detection that’s now analysed by AI as opposed to human oversight?


It's not so much that these matches are detected by AI and these matches are detected by humans. Te real reason that the technology is in place is for the AI component to support human analysis. We monitor hundreds of thousands of matches per year and the AI model is there to separate the wheat from the chaff as it were and identifies the small subset of potentially suspicious matches that require further human analysis. Our Universal Fraud Detection System


122


(UFDS), a system we built at Sportradar, processes data taken from a wide range of operators, from major to local operators. Te system ingests all the betting data, and the AI model is there to identify suspicious betting activities - be it pre-match markets with a large odds change, increased turnover on a certain betting market, or in live betting markets, increased turnover or odds deviation from expected levels. Te AI and alerting system are there to essentially flag out matches that require further human analysis.


Te AI model has been a terrific addition it's constantly learning, improving and ingesting data from multiple sources. It does things that humans can do at a much greater speed, but there is always going to be a need for human analysis. Strong betting doesn't always point to suspicious betting. Tere are various reasons for strong betting. For example, as we came out of the pandemic and live sports resumed there were situations where large swathes of players would be ruled out. Tere are other examples when a team has been spotted travelling to a match at the airport and several star players aren't travelling. Tat have even been situations where a team has started 10 players and been forced to play a second goalkeeper outfield. Tese are all instances that require human analysis to differentiate between what is legitimate betting and what is suspicious betting.


Does every global sports activity receive the same level of scrutiny, or is the computational power of the UFDS more targeted than that?


One of the greatest things about the machine learning model and the increased use of AI in our monitoring is the ability to monitor in a horses for courses manner. Each sport has its own betting dynamics.


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116  |  Page 117  |  Page 118  |  Page 119  |  Page 120  |  Page 121  |  Page 122  |  Page 123  |  Page 124  |  Page 125  |  Page 126  |  Page 127  |  Page 128  |  Page 129  |  Page 130  |  Page 131  |  Page 132  |  Page 133  |  Page 134  |  Page 135  |  Page 136  |  Page 137  |  Page 138  |  Page 139  |  Page 140  |  Page 141  |  Page 142  |  Page 143  |  Page 144  |  Page 145  |  Page 146  |  Page 147  |  Page 148  |  Page 149  |  Page 150  |  Page 151  |  Page 152  |  Page 153  |  Page 154  |  Page 155  |  Page 156  |  Page 157  |  Page 158  |  Page 159  |  Page 160  |  Page 161  |  Page 162  |  Page 163  |  Page 164  |  Page 165  |  Page 166  |  Page 167  |  Page 168  |  Page 169  |  Page 170  |  Page 171  |  Page 172  |  Page 173  |  Page 174  |  Page 175  |  Page 176  |  Page 177  |  Page 178  |  Page 179  |  Page 180  |  Page 181  |  Page 182  |  Page 183  |  Page 184  |  Page 185  |  Page 186  |  Page 187  |  Page 188  |  Page 189  |  Page 190  |  Page 191  |  Page 192  |  Page 193  |  Page 194  |  Page 195  |  Page 196  |  Page 197  |  Page 198  |  Page 199  |  Page 200  |  Page 201  |  Page 202  |  Page 203  |  Page 204  |  Page 205  |  Page 206  |  Page 207  |  Page 208  |  Page 209  |  Page 210  |  Page 211  |  Page 212  |  Page 213  |  Page 214  |  Page 215  |  Page 216  |  Page 217  |  Page 218  |  Page 219  |  Page 220  |  Page 221  |  Page 222  |  Page 223  |  Page 224  |  Page 225  |  Page 226  |  Page 227  |  Page 228  |  Page 229  |  Page 230  |  Page 231  |  Page 232  |  Page 233  |  Page 234  |  Page 235  |  Page 236  |  Page 237  |  Page 238  |  Page 239  |  Page 240  |  Page 241  |  Page 242  |  Page 243  |  Page 244  |  Page 245  |  Page 246  |  Page 247  |  Page 248  |  Page 249  |  Page 250  |  Page 251  |  Page 252