This page contains a Flash digital edition of a book.
gineco
ro
tehnici chirurgicale
if from the first postoperatory week.
The early diagnostic allow an efficient
treatment before the local inflammation
appear. Sadly, the diagnosis is late in the
majority of cases, so the procedure need
to be postponed for at least 3 months.
5. Urinary retention is usually transient
and give up after urethral cateterization,
sometimes being necessary to use “a
demeur” catheterization for a couple of
days. A urethral catheter is normally used
from the beginning in the procedures for
urogenital prolapse.
6. Hemorrhage. An early abundant
hemorrhage indicates a wrong
dissection layer; the lack of visibility
could lead to the interception of the
bladder. A sudden bleeding at the level
of the vaginal fornix is a sign in case of
uterine artery interception. Commonly,
the cauterization must be avoided in
order to reduce the death of the tissues
and to prevent vesicovaginal fistulae.
7. Dispareuny. Dispareuny appears
after an excessive tightening of the
vagina – a reason to avoid direct suture
Figure 17. Urethral lesions
on elevators muscles and appear of
vicious scars.
this artery is sectioned and ligaturated occurs, the rectum must be double 8. Recurrent rectocel, vaginal stenosis
during peritonization. The clinic layered sutured with vycril. The lesions and vault prolapse are considered rare
response of the interceptention of the of the bowel and of the rectum are rare complications if the diagnosis and
ureters is represented by anuria, fever, when uterus is well isolated and when surgical indications were correctly
side pain and ileus there are no intraperitoneal adhesions. applied.
3. Anal lesions – can be avoided using 4. Rectovaginal and uretrovaginal
a carefully dissection and by underlining fistulae are considered rare incidents Photos - courtesy Urology
the prerectal fascia. When those lesions but there is a possibility to manifest even Clinic Oradea
Bibliografie
1. Olsen A.L., Smith V.J., Bergstrom J.O., Colling J.C., Clark A.L. 8. Colombo M., Zoretta G., Vitabello D., Milani R. The Burch
- Epidemiology of surgically managed pelvic organ pro- colposuspension for women with and without detrusor ac-
lapse and urinary incontinence. Obstet Gynecol. 1997 Apr; tivity – Br. J. Obs. Gynecology 1966; 103:355-60
89(4):501-6. 9. Razapour M., Ulmsten V. Tension free vaginal tape (TVT) in
2. Clark A.L., Gregory T., Smith V.J., Edwards Epidemiologic women with mixed urinary incontinence – long term fallou
evaluation of reoperation for surgically treated pelvic organ up – Int. Urogynecol J 2001 (Supl 2):515 – 8.
prolapse and urinary incontinence. RAm J Obstet Gynecol. 10. Spinosa J.P., Dubuis P.Y., Riederer B. Chirurgie de
2003 Nov ; 189(5):1261-7. l`incontinence urinaire a l`effort feminine par voie tran-
3. Bumbu G. Screening - Incontinenţă. Tulburări urinare. Pro- sobturatrice: dehors – dedans ou dedans – dehors? Etude
laps.Revista Romana de Uroginecologie; 1/2006. anatomique comparative –– Departement de Gynecologie
4. Carley M.E., Turner R.J., Scott D.E., Alexander J.M. Obstet- et Obstetrique, Hospitaux Universitaires de Genive, Su-
ric history in women with surgically corrected adult urinary isse.
incontinence or pelvic organ prolapse. J Am Assoc Gynecol 11. Fischer A., Fink T., Zachmann S., Eickenbusch U. Com-
Laparosc. 1999 Feb; 6(1):85-9. parison of retropubic and autside-in transobturator sling
5. Muire T.W., Tulikanges Pk., Fidela Paroiso M., Walters M.D. systems for the cure of female genuine stress urinary in-
The relationship of tension free vaginal tape insertion and continence – Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics,
the vascular anatomy, Obst-Gynecology 2003; 101:933-6 Hessen, Germany, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecol-
6. Jensen J.K., Nielsen F.R., Ostergard D.R. The role of patient ogy, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dal-
history in the diagnosis of uirinary incontinence. Obst. Gy- las 75235-9032, USA.
necol. 1994; 83:904-910 12. Costantini Elisabeta, Mearini L., Bini V., Zucchi A.Y., Mea-
7. Diokno A.C., Wells T.G., Brink C.A. Urinary incontinence in rini E., Porena M. Uterus Preservation in Surgical Correc-
eldery woman: Urodynamic evaluation. J. An Geriatr. Soc.; tion of Urogenital Prolapse – Department of Urology, Uni-
1987; 35:940-946 versity of Perugia, Italy.
pag. 54 Vol. 4, Nr. 1 /februarie 2008
Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68
Produced with Yudu - www.yudu.com