This page contains a Flash digital edition of a book.
TECHNOLOGY LEDs


Figure 4. Unlike a conventional green LED, cranking up the current does not lead to a shift in emission wavelength


Increasing dimensions We are not the pioneers of cubic GaN, and our contribution to this field is to increase the size of this material. We are following in the footsteps of the likes of the groups of Donat As at the University of Paderborn, and Tom Foxon and Sergei Novikov at the University of Nottingham – teams that produced cubic GaN layers and devices, starting mainly with 3C-SiC and GaAs cubic substrates.


Attributes of cubic GaN


One of the great strengths of the cubic phase of GaN is that it has no internal electric fields in the typical growth direction, and thus no quantum confined Stark effect. The benefits of this are twofold: bands no longer move with increasing current, so the emission wavelength is fixed; and the overlap of electrons and holes in the quantum wells increases, so these carriers are more likely to recombine radiatively. Removal of the electric fields also opens up the possibility to turn to wider quantum wells that enable efficient radiative recombination while lowering Auger recombination rates.


Another great virtue of cubic GaN is its bandgap: At 3.2 eV, it is 0.2 eV lower than that of the hexagonal phase. This difference means that cubic GaN has almost a 30 nm head start prior to growth for making long-wavelength emitters, which is a great benefit when aiming for green LEDs.


What’s more, cubic GaN theoretically has better transport properties than the hexagonal variant due to higher crystal symmetry. Holes are a necessary player in producing light from LEDs, but p-type hexagonal GaN is notorious for its low concentration of holes and their poor mobility. Since holes do not move around as freely as electrons, most of the emission from an LED comes from the last quantum well − the one closest to the p-side. Better hole mobility would increase its population in many quantum wells, culminating in more light from the device. At low hole concentrations, hole mobility in cubic GaN has been reported at 350 cm2 less than 200 cm2


V-1 V-1


Figure 5. In a hexagonal InGaN quantum well (left), electron and hole wave- functions are spatially separated due to internal polarization fields. In a cubic InGaN quantum well of the same Indium composition (right), carriers overlap and the emitted photon is of longer wavelength


56 www.compoundsemiconductor.net January / February 2014 s-1 s-1 compared to in hexagonal GaN.


The MBE growth technique that both of these groups have used is highly versatile, but limited to growth rates of the order of 100 nm/hr. This means that the deposition of an LED structure can take 10 hours or more, an impractically long time for LED manufacture, which is better served by MOCVD. Groups led by Heber Vilchis from Cinvestav and Shigefusa Chichibu from the University of Tsukuba have shown that this deposition technology can form cubic GaN on GaAs and 3C-SiC, respectively, but crystal size is small and phase purity poor. We are now addressing these shortcomings with an approach that offers production scalability, and begins with the most common form of silicon. By using this form, silicon (001), we have the potential to reach wafer sizes of 300 mm.


To address the well-known mismatch problem, we do not directly deposit a film of cubic GaN on a flat silicon wafer, but instead initiate growth in narrow stripes, which can eventually coalesce (see Figure 1). By employing a micro-patterned substrate, we can ‘trick’ GaN into forming the cubic phase in micro-stripes created from two separate hexagonal crystals.


One of the biggest challenges that we face is that the cubic phase of GaN is metastable – from a thermodynamic perspective, it would rather be hexagonal. However, the energy difference between the two phases is only 10 meV/atom, and if this wide bandgap material forms the cubic phase, it will probably stay that way. The challenge is to get the atoms into the cubic configuration for long enough to repeat the pattern. The difference between these polytypes is merely one of stacking: in the hexagon phase the layers alternate ABABAB, whereas in the cubic phase, every third layer is the same, so the pattern is ABCABC.


Our starting point is a micro-patterned silicon (001) substrate, which is prepared by our collaborator, the group of Steven Brueck at the University of New Mexico. This team uses interference pattern lithography to define long stripes parallel to the (110) direction. These stripes are then etched into the silicon to produce an array of V-shaped grooves with (111)-type sidewalls running the length of the substrate. The grooves have an 800 nm opening and are spaced at a 4 µm pitch.


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116  |  Page 117  |  Page 118  |  Page 119  |  Page 120  |  Page 121  |  Page 122  |  Page 123  |  Page 124  |  Page 125  |  Page 126  |  Page 127  |  Page 128  |  Page 129  |  Page 130  |  Page 131  |  Page 132  |  Page 133  |  Page 134  |  Page 135  |  Page 136  |  Page 137  |  Page 138  |  Page 139  |  Page 140  |  Page 141  |  Page 142  |  Page 143  |  Page 144  |  Page 145  |  Page 146  |  Page 147  |  Page 148  |  Page 149  |  Page 150  |  Page 151  |  Page 152  |  Page 153  |  Page 154  |  Page 155  |  Page 156  |  Page 157  |  Page 158  |  Page 159  |  Page 160  |  Page 161  |  Page 162  |  Page 163  |  Page 164  |  Page 165  |  Page 166  |  Page 167  |  Page 168  |  Page 169