search.noResults

search.searching

saml.title
dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
74 SCALP CARE Average % change in hair shaft thickness (µm) Placebo ■ Active treatment ■ T28 VS T0 -0.90% 5.00% T56 VS T0 -1.70% 8.20% -1.60% T84 VS T0 -2.50 -0.00 2.50 5.00 Mean % Variation Figure 4: Hair shaft thickness


■ +33.5% after 84 days (statistically significant) In contrast, the placebo group was non- significant at each time point.


Hair shaft thickness Hair shaft thickness improved significantly after 84 days of treatment. Percentage changes for the active formulation were: ■ +5% after 28 days (statistically significant) ■ +8.2% after 56 days (statistically significant) ■ +10.6% after 84 days (statistically significant) In contrast, the placebo group was non- significant at each time point.


Scalp hydration Scalp hydration improved substantially in the active treatment group. Percentage changes for the active formulation


were: ■ +17.5% after 28 days (statistically significant) ■ +19.1% after 56 days (statistically significant) ■ +22.2% after 84 days (statistically significant) In contrast, the placebo group was non- significant at each time point.


Sebum level Sebum level was impacted substantially in the active treatment group. Percentage changes for the active formulation


were: ■ -15.4% after 28 days ■ -29.2% after 56 days (statistically significant) ■ -30.2% after 84 days (statistically significant) In contrast, the placebo group was non- significant at each time point.


Discussion The results of this study demonstrate that a topical cosmetic treatment containing biomimetic fibroblast growth factor-2 delivered via plant- derived oleosome carriers can influence multiple biological processes associated with scalp ageing. Statistically significant improvements were


PERSONAL CARE MAGAZINE May 2026


observed across several parameters related to both follicular activity and scalp condition. The most notable improvements included


enhancements in hair cycle balance, hair density, hair shaft thickness, scalp hydration, and sebum regulation. Together, these parameters reflect the biological activity of hair follicles as well as the quality of the scalp microenvironment that supports hair growth. One of the most important findings was


the increase in the anagen/telogen ratio. This parameter reflects the proportion of follicles actively engaged in the growth phase of the hair cycle. Under healthy conditions, the majority of follicles remain in the anagen phase. However, ageing, environmental stress, and inflammatory processes can shift follicles prematurely into the telogen phase, leading to increased shedding and reduced hair density. The increase in the anagen/telogen ratio observed in the active treatment group suggests stimulation of follicular activity and a shift toward the growth phase. Improvements in hair density further support


this observation. Hair density represents the number of actively producing follicles within a defined scalp area and is commonly used as an indicator of follicular productivity. The increases observed during the study indicate that the formulation may help support active follicle function and improve overall hair coverage. Increases in hair shaft thickness were also


observed. Hair fibre diameter contributes significantly to the visual perception of hair volume, and even modest increases in shaft thickness can translate into noticeable improvements in hair fullness. Beyond follicular activity, improvements in


scalp hydration and sebum balance suggest beneficial effects on the scalp environment. Adequate hydration supports barrier integrity and optimal skin physiology, while balanced sebum levels help maintain lipid protection at the


skin surface. Together, these factors contribute to creating a favourable microenvironment for follicular function. An important aspect of these findings is the


combination of biological signaling with delivery technology. Growth factors such as FGF-2 are inherently sensitive proteins that can rapidly lose activity in conventional cosmetic formulations. The oleosome delivery system provides a


protective lipid microenvironment that helps preserve protein structure while maintaining compatibility with the skin barrier. By coupling this delivery system with plant biofactory production, it becomes possible to manufacture stabilized biomimetic proteins that retain biological activity in topical formulations. Overall, the results suggest that combining


biologically active proteins with plant-derived lipid delivery structures may represent a promising new strategy for addressing multiple biological drivers of scalp ageing through cosmetic treatments.


Conclusion This randomized clinical study demonstrates that a cosmetic scalp treatment containing biomimetic fibroblast growth factor-2 delivered through plant- derived oleosome carriers can significantly improve several biological parameters associated with scalp ageing. The formulation produced measurable improvements in hair cycle dynamics, hair density, hair shaft thickness, and scalp hydration while contributing to a more balanced scalp environment. These findings suggest that combining


biologically active proteins with lipid-based delivery structures may offer a new approach to cosmetic hair care by addressing multiple biological drivers of scalp ageing simultaneously. Biomimetic growth factor technologies


produced through plant biofactories therefore represent a promising emerging category of cosmetic ingredients capable of supporting scalp health and improving the appearance of hair density and quality.


7.50 10.60% 10.00


www.personalcaremagazine.com PCM


Time Points (Days)


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100