search.noResults

search.searching

saml.title
dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
SCALP CARE 73


an alternative production strategy capable of generating complex recombinant proteins in a scalable and sustainable manner. In this approach, plants are engineered to


produce the desired protein directly within plant tissues. In the case of oleosome-fused proteins, the recombinant protein is expressed within developing oilseed cells where it becomes naturally incorporated into the oleosome structure. This method offers several advantages. First,


plant production systems eliminate the need for animal-derived cell cultures, reducing ethical and regulatory concerns associated with mammalian expression systems. Second, plant biofactories operate in


controlled greenhouse environments, allowing large-scale protein production with relatively low energy input and minimal environmental impact. Third, because the protein is produced already


fused to the oleosome structure, downstream processing requirements are simplified compared with conventional protein purification processes. The resulting ingredient is therefore both


biologically active and inherently stabilized through its association with the plant-derived oleosome particle.


Evaluation of the efficacy of cosmetic scalp treatments: randomized blind placebo- controlled study Materials and methods - study design A randomized single-blind clinical study was conducted to evaluate the efficacy of a cosmetic scalp treatment in improving hair density and scalp condition. Forty volunteers were enrolled in the study.


Twenty volunteers received the active formulation with 2% Oleosome-FGF2 (Serum A), while 20 volunteers received a placebo formulation (Serum B).


Figure 3: Before and after - Consumer from active treatment group


The treatment period lasted 84 days, during which participants applied the product twice daily directly to the scalp. Measurements were taken at baseline (T0), after 28 days (T28), after 56 days (T56), and after 84 days (T84). Volunteers were instructed not to use other scalp treatments during the study period.


Instrumentation Hair and scalp parameters were evaluated using validated dermo-cosmetic instrumentation: ■ C-CUBE Pixience digital phototrichogram system ■ Corneometer CM825 ■ Sebumeter SM815


Results Anagen/telogen ratio The active treatment significantly improved the


balance between anagen and telogen hair phases. Baseline anagen/telogen ratios were:


■ Serum A: 8.4 ■ Serum B: 8.3 Percentage changes for the active formulation were: ■ +14.0% after 28 days (statistically significant) ■ +15.4% after 56 days (statistically significant) ■ +17.0% after 84 days (statistically significant) In contrast, the placebo group showed smaller


changes, including +5.2% after 28 days and non- significant results at 56 and 84 days.


Hair density Hair density improved significantly in the active treatment group compared with placebo. Percentage changes for the active formulation


were: ■ +33.6% after 28 days (statistically significant) ■ +32.7% after 56 days (statistically significant)


T0 T84


www.personalcaremagazine.com


May 2026 PERSONAL CARE MAGAZINE


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100