search.noResults

search.searching

saml.title
dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
88 SKIN CARE


Day


Post-application repair


TEWL & erythema Assessment


Figure 11: Repair action - clinical protocol


chemical stress with SLS significantly reduced the extent of skin barrier damage. This supports the therapeutic action of the lipophilic active in promoting skin barrier function, even after a single application. The lipophilic active significantly


accelerates the barrier function recovery when applied after stress (a reduction in TEWL of -15.1%, -28.6%, -32.2% and -37.4% after 30 minutes, one hour, two hours and 24 hours from patch removal, respectively). The placebo did not show any difference compared to untreated skin (Figure 12). The measurement of skin erythema also


demonstrated the therapeutic effectiveness of the lipophilic active formulation. Untreated skin still showed clinical signs of skin irritation after 24 hours from SLS exposure. Post-SLS exposure application of the lipophilic active formulation hastened the recovery of skin homeostasis (a reduction in erythema -6.6%, -6.4%, - 8.4% and -10.1% after 30 minutes, one hour, two hours and 24 hours from patch removal, respectively) more than the application of the placebo (Figure 13). The lipophilic active helps to repair the skin from chemically induced erythema, showing a soothing effect after a single application.


Conclusion Public awareness of the importance of hand sanitisation during the current pandemic event


Product applied after SLS exposure -Post-treatment -One single application


0 -5


-10 -15


-20 -25 -30 -35 -40


is likely to have a far-reaching effect on hygiene habits across the globe. New norms of hygiene, such as the routine use of hand sanitisers and frequent handwashing, will continue beyond the COVID-19 era. It is essential to find solutions for cleaning and sanitising the skin while maintaining its main function as a barrier to external agents, including pathogens. Chemical agents contained in hand


sanitisers and personal cleansing products can affect the top layers of the stratum corneum, disrupting the lipid matrix of the skin barrier and causing excessive TEWL. They can also penetrate deeper into the skin, interacting with living cells and initiating an inflammatory reaction, ultimately leading to skin erythema. The lipophilic active has shown a way to


counteract these negative effects, thanks to the synergistic effect of its main components, Echium plantagineum seed oil, Cninidium monnieri fruit extract and Rosmarinus officinalis leaf extract. This combination plays a key role in the restoration of the skin lipid matrix and in anti-inflammatory processes, preventing and repairing skin barrier damages, improving skin hydration levels and decreasing irritation and skin sensitivity (Figure 14). In a ‘new normal’ skincare scenario, where non-irritating products are in high demand, the lipophilic active can offer several functional solutions. It can be added directly to hygiene products, such as alcohol-based hand sanitisers and personal cleansing products, or it can be used in moisturising treatments with both protective and therapeutic functions against chemical stress.


Untreated skin ■ Lipophilic active ■ Placebo ■


Product applied after SLS exposure -Post-treatment -One single application


6 4 2 0


-2 -4 -6 -8


30’ 1h 2h 24h 30’ 1h 2h 24h 30’ Time after SLS-patch removal Figure 12: Variation in TEWL in the repairing protocol. PERSONAL CARE November 2021 1h 2h 24h


-10 -12


30’ 1h 2h 24h 30’ 1h 2h 24h 30’ Time after SLS-patch removal Figure 13: Variation in skin erythema in the repairing protocol www.personalcaremagazine.com 1h 2h 24h The use of an alcohol-based hand sanitiser


containing 1% lipophilic active was successful in preventing the damage caused by ethanol. An improvement in the skin barrier function was observed after its first application, accompanied by an immediate increase in skin moisturisation, which persisted through time. The clinical action of the lipophilic active also


extends to its ability to reduce the aggressiveness of surfactant agents. It acts as a protective ‘mask’, if applied before stress, preventing damage to the barrier function and skin sensitivity, and also as a ‘destroyer’ of chemical agents, if applied after the stress, accelerating skin barrier repair and reducing skin irritation.


References 1. Beiu C, Mihai M, Popa L, Cima L, Popescu M.N. Frequent hand washing for COVID-19 prevention can cause hand dermatitis: Management tips. Cureus. 2020;12(4):e7506. doi: 10.7759/cureus.7506


2. Berardi A, Perinelli D.R, Merchant H.A, Bisharat L, Basheti I.A, Bonacucina G, Cespi M, Palmieri GF. Hand sanitisers amid COVID-19: A critical review of alcohol-based products on the market and formulation approaches to respond to increasing demand. Int. J. Pharm. 2020;584:119431. doi: 10.1016/j. ijpharm.2020.119431


3. Golin AP, Choi D, Ghahary A. Hand sanitisers: A review of ingredients, mechanisms of action, modes of delivery, and efficacy against coronaviruses. Am. J. Infect. Control.


Untreated skin ■ Lipophilic active ■ Placebo ■ Baseline


0 1


10


11


2% SLS Product application -One single application 12


-After chemical stress 13


30’ 1h 2h 24h Effect of post-treatment


PC


% variation in TEWL repairing effect


% variation in TEWL repairing effect


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104