search.noResults

search.searching

saml.title
dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
ANTI-AGEING


61


Making sense of senses for anti-ageing cosmetics


Céline Laperdrix, Gabrielle Moro, Pierre-Yves Morvan, Romuald Vallee – Codif Technologie Naturelle


By law, a cosmetic product is described as a substance or mixture applied on skin with a view, exclusively or mainly, to clean, to perfume, to modify appearance, to protect. It is very well understood that active ingredients give efficacy while other formulation compounds are responsible for sensations in application. In recent times, consumer expect both


pleasure in application of formulas and high efficacy in treatment of skin disorders. More and more, cosmetic developments are not exclusively guided by notions of rational effectiveness but also by notions of sensoriality.


The sensorial properties of a cosmetic


product are studied using internationally recognized discriminating or descriptive methods.1,2


Yet focusing on high value cosmetic


products, some manufacturers have forgotten that the skin is both a living organ and also a powerful communication tool using all senses. Skin is a sensory organ and skin concerns all senses: sight, sound, smell, taste and touch. Skin has to be considered as a detector for all senses and perceptions. Therefore, all senses have to be considered in cosmetic development. To illustrate this purpose, this article will describe the results of Codif’s research concerning an active ingredient obtained from upcycled pomace of apple (Marie Menard variety): Regetaste. This is the first demonstration example of efficiency upgraded by consideration of all human senses.


Activating the bitter taste receptors of the skin, it induces many processes linked to keratinocyte differentiation, even until desquamation achievement, and it reduces epidermal senescence. In vivo, protection, radiance and smoothness are measured; seen, heard and touched.


Activation of skin taste receptors for skin regeneration The best way to activate TAS2R receptors has been elucidated using artificial intelligence tools. Molecular docking reveals the high potential of one polyphenol to activate bitterness receptors. Knowing that bitter apples traditionally


Placebo ■ 1% Regetaste ■ 2% Regetaste ■ ***


12 5.3


6.3 *


7.1 *


7.5 *


ABSTRACT


While the demand of consumers for proof behind claims is higher than ever, cutting edge methods are emerging with smart instrumental approach; opening the way to new skincare claims considering holistically all senses. Thanks to tribology, we are now able to study the benefits of anti-ageing strategy on the texture of the skin through its vibrations and the ‘song’ it emits. This new approach reminds us how the skin is both a living organ and also a sensorial communication powerful tool.


used in Brittany for cider production are rich in polyphenols, we have orientated our development on the pomace of Marie Menard apple, which presents the best balance of polyphenols and acidity. With an upcycling approach, the pomace


of Marie Menard apple is dried and used for water-soluble extraction. The final extract, characterized by a richness in polyphenols and also the presence of malic acid is finally increasing the synthesis of TAS2R4 and TAS2R5 receptors in keratinocytes by 42% and 11% respectively. More interestingly, it significantly increases


1 D4 www.personalcaremagazine.com D7 Figure 1: In vivo evaluation of the integrity of the barrier function (*p<0.05; ***p<0.001 Student test)


the activation of these receptors (GPCR protein). It induces intracellular calcium release in a dose-dependant manner up to +532% (p<0.001 Student test). As described in literature, this huge


activation of bitterness receptors is directly January 2024 PERSONAL CARE


% variation versus D0


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80