search.noResults

search.searching

saml.title
dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
Many founders focus on selling a vision rather than


providing a structured, data-backed presentation. A strong pitch should have no more than 10 slides, covering key aspects like business model, traction, financials, and


investment strategy. VLADIMIR MALAKCHI CEO and Managing Partner Xanada Investments


It’s open to Pre-Seed, Seed, and Series A start-ups, whether they’re entering the market or scaling an existing product. Te $50,000 equity investment is just one part of the opportunity - the real value comes from direct investor mentorship, industry connections, and marketing and PR support, all designed to accelerate market positioning and drive future funding opportunities. To further support the winners, the contest also includes a comprehensive prize package from partners and judges, $10,000 in AWS credits to offset bills, exclusive savings, and discounts available through the global network of AWS partners.


A pitch contest only matters if it leads to something bigger. Tis one is built to do exactly that - giving founders access to the right capital, strategic partners, and the network they need to grow fast and sustain that growth long-term.


What are the most common mistakes start-ups made in the last competition that stopped them from moving forward?


Tere are a few recurring issues that consistently prevent start-ups from moving forward. Te reality is the same mistakes we saw in the last competition and across many applications keep showing up. One of the biggest issues is poor pitch preparation - only 30 per cent of start-ups present a pitch that truly reflects their business. Many founders focus on selling a vision rather than providing a structured, data-backed presentation. A strong pitch should have no more than 10 slides, covering key aspects like business model, traction, financials, and investment strategy.


Another common mistake is focusing too much on the product while neglecting business fundamentals. Investors need to see a clear revenue model, scalability strategy, and market validation - without these, even the most innovative idea won’t secure funding. Financial clarity is another weak spot. Many start-ups submit unrealistic projections, vague budgets, or incomplete financial documentation.


Investors want to understand how funds will be used and what the expected ROI is. If founders can’t confidently present their numbers,


46


it’s a major red flag. Lastly, underestimating competition and market challenges often holds start-ups back. Some founders fail to demonstrate a deep understanding of their industry or how they’ll differentiate. Investors need to see a well-thought-out competitive strategy and market positioning to consider a start-up investable. Success comes down to execution, preparation, and clear business strategy - start-ups that get this right stand the best chance of moving forward.


What advice would you give to start-ups who want to stand out during the finalist selection process?


Over the years, I’ve seen countless start-ups pitch for investment, and one thing is clear: the ones that stand out are the ones that come prepared, self-aware, and ready to execute.


My biggest piece of advice? Be brutally honest about your business. Many founders get caught up in the excitement of their idea but fail to analyse their weaknesses and challenges critically. Investors don’t expect perfection, but they do expect you to understand your risks and have a plan to mitigate them. If your start-up has gaps - whether in market validation, financial strategy, or execution - acknowledge them and show how you’re actively working to solve them.


Your pitch is your first real test. It’s not just about presenting a product; it’s about demonstrating that you have a business worth investing in. Founders who succeed are the ones who can clearly explain their market positioning, revenue model, competitive edge, and growth potential - all while keeping it structured, concise, and engaging. If you can’t explain how your business will generate returns in a few minutes, you’re not ready for investment.


Finally, be strategic about the narrative you build. Investors don’t just look at numbers - they look at people. Show that you and your team have the resilience, adaptability, and execution skills to scale a business, not just launch a product. At the end of the day, funding follows those who not only have a strong idea but prove they have what it takes to turn that idea into a successful company.


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116  |  Page 117  |  Page 118  |  Page 119  |  Page 120  |  Page 121  |  Page 122  |  Page 123  |  Page 124  |  Page 125  |  Page 126  |  Page 127  |  Page 128  |  Page 129  |  Page 130  |  Page 131  |  Page 132  |  Page 133  |  Page 134  |  Page 135  |  Page 136  |  Page 137  |  Page 138  |  Page 139  |  Page 140  |  Page 141  |  Page 142  |  Page 143  |  Page 144  |  Page 145  |  Page 146  |  Page 147  |  Page 148  |  Page 149  |  Page 150  |  Page 151  |  Page 152  |  Page 153  |  Page 154  |  Page 155  |  Page 156  |  Page 157  |  Page 158  |  Page 159  |  Page 160  |  Page 161  |  Page 162  |  Page 163  |  Page 164  |  Page 165  |  Page 166  |  Page 167  |  Page 168  |  Page 169  |  Page 170  |  Page 171  |  Page 172  |  Page 173  |  Page 174  |  Page 175  |  Page 176  |  Page 177  |  Page 178  |  Page 179  |  Page 180  |  Page 181  |  Page 182  |  Page 183  |  Page 184  |  Page 185  |  Page 186  |  Page 187  |  Page 188