search.noResults

search.searching

saml.title
dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
Pulse


A revised Gambling Interstate Treaty will come into force in Germany in July making online gambling legal and regulated across the country’s 16 states for the first time. What similarities do the two markets share? Do you expect one to be more lucrative than the other?


Antoine: Tere are some differences in the regulation- the Dutch seeming to be the more reasonable of the two. Tere are learnings evident in the regulation inspired by how other jurisdictions have chosen to regulate.


Two big markets with customer bases that have a propensity to go online for entertainment, however, it is already clear during the transitional regime in Germany, that the current player restrictions have made it a challenging market for the operators who see long-term prospects for the German market and currently going for the licensed approach.


On the other hand, a good number of German players are likely to be moving to offshore sites or operators who are not abiding to these restrictions. It is also still uncertain on how the licensing process will process and how tax will be applied.


Te way forward for the Netherlands regarding the licensing requirements and the tax regime is better defined at this point. Tis can only help the Dutch market flourish sooner, especially for the operators who get a license earlier.


Blanka: Holland is not as large or as wealthy as Germany, which partially explains why the latter has attracted so much more attention. Nevertheless, with a population of nearly 20 million, the Netherlands will undoubtedly still be an important market for many.


We already know that Dutch players spend more on average than their German counterparts, and I predict that, with time, the Dutch market could be an even bigger revenue driver than its neighbour to the East.


Javier: Both markets are among the largest in Europe and have things in common, but players prefer different games in both countries. Although Germany is much larger than the Netherlands, the average spend per player is higher in the Netherlands than in Germany.


Alexia: I do not see too many similarities between these two markets. However, one defining parallel is the clear desire to regulate online gambling operations on their own terms and according to their respective vision of what responsible gambling and player protection should be.


Both markets will be lucrative but will be organised differently, with growth curves and the timing for consolidation varying widely.


In Germany, it's about accepting the opportunity P90 WIRE / PULSE / INSIGHT / REPORTS


of new terms - the ‘new normal’, if you will. Te long-anticipated opportunity there will not materialise in quite the fashion that the industry expected, however we must accept the situation for what it is, and I believe success can certainly be achieved there.


While Germany is a large country with huge potential, the severe nature of restrictions on operators impedes the creation of a functional market, commercially. It will likely pan out to see the larger, more robust operators enjoy an oligopoly - those who possess the strength and durability to withstand the impacts of regulatory constraints – as the bar is set to be very high for the foreseeable future.


Developing the regulated market in Germany will require perseverance from the authorised operators, as conditions are likely to get tougher before they get better. In the early days, post April 1, the marketing advantages available would be offset by the grey market competition and the regulated space would not deliver the expected return in some cases. Speed of enforcement among unauthorised operators will be key to consolidating the market for committed operators to start seeing success.


Te Netherlands on the other hand, is closer to the market entries the industry experienced in the first half of the last decade, even if the cool- off period conditions are impacting the timing of entry for some operators, the number of participants will be larger and overall, more diverse.


Tying B2B supplier’s activity to an operator’s licence could prove a pivotal point in managing the grey market and should see more players commit entirely to regulated operations sooner than they may have otherwise.


Tere are quick growth opportunities available in the Netherlands for operators who can meet and sustain the licence application conditions, and for suppliers, it also offers the opportunity to access new casinos that have not yet started operating online locally but possess strong brand recognition and loyalty.


Vladimir: Te current retail offering in the Netherlands, will continue to have an edge when the market regulates. But online has great potential too, given the size of the country, which is home to 17 million people. While not as big as Germany (population 83 million), expected player value is high and restrictions within the gaming offering in the Netherlands are not expected to be as strict as they are in Germany.


The way forward for the Netherlands regarding the licensing requirements and the tax regime is better defined at this point. This can only help the Dutch market flourish sooner, especially for the operators who get a license earlier.


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116  |  Page 117  |  Page 118  |  Page 119  |  Page 120  |  Page 121  |  Page 122  |  Page 123  |  Page 124  |  Page 125  |  Page 126  |  Page 127  |  Page 128  |  Page 129  |  Page 130  |  Page 131  |  Page 132  |  Page 133  |  Page 134