nation level. Conclusions Besides conceptual and methodological issues of the globalization
process, this study shows that at least for the moment, the regional image has a less important correlation with the ethnic structure. It is clear that more de- tailed studies are to come at county level and even local level. Our analysis was only general, but it is certain that one of the testing hypotheses ways is the direct questioning of the investors. They must be used as witnesses in defining the role of regional images for the making decisions process. In such a context it is possible to better show, for given time intervals, the role of the ethnic structure in attracting investors. It remains to demonstrate how strong a factor is the ethnic diversity in creating a positive image, later to bean attractive factor for locating globaliza- tion.
Anyway, it is sure that the entrepreneurial attitude seems to be higher
in a multiethnic space than in an homogenous one, and the statistics prove it. On the other hand, it is not as clear for the volume and structure of foreign investments, at least for Romania. It is probable that the lack of an answer is due to the low foreign investments in Romania, during the post-totalitarian period. A volume of foreign direct investment of around 10 billion Euros in 15 years is not sufficient by far to draw a clear conclusion.
Bibliography
Cretan R., Guran-Nica L., Platon D. and Turnock D. (2005), Foreign Di- rect Investment and Social Risk in Romania: Progress in Less-Favoured Ar- eas. In: D. Turnock (ed.): Foreign Direct Investment and Regional Develop- ment in East Central Europe and the Former Soviet Union, Ashgate, Alde- shot, 305-348. Fagan R. (1997), Local food/global food: globalization and local restruc-
turing. In: R.Lee and J. Wills (eds), Geographies of Economics, Arnold, Lon- don, 197-208. Heller W., Ianoş I. (2004), Spatial Pattern of Economy and Migration in
Post-Socialist Romania, Europa Regional, 1, 4-12. Ianoş I. (2006), Socio-economic Effects of the Regional Development on National Minorities. Banat Province as Case Study, Wiener Osteuropa Studien, 21, p.80-98. Ianoş I., Heller W. (2007), Minorities and image of local/regional in the context of globalization. Romania as case study, Globalisierung, Sudosteuropa Studien 74, p.53-70.
in 57
Ethnizität in der
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36 |
Page 37 |
Page 38 |
Page 39 |
Page 40 |
Page 41 |
Page 42 |
Page 43 |
Page 44 |
Page 45 |
Page 46 |
Page 47 |
Page 48 |
Page 49 |
Page 50 |
Page 51 |
Page 52 |
Page 53 |
Page 54 |
Page 55 |
Page 56 |
Page 57 |
Page 58 |
Page 59 |
Page 60 |
Page 61 |
Page 62 |
Page 63 |
Page 64 |
Page 65 |
Page 66 |
Page 67 |
Page 68 |
Page 69 |
Page 70 |
Page 71 |
Page 72 |
Page 73 |
Page 74 |
Page 75 |
Page 76 |
Page 77 |
Page 78 |
Page 79 |
Page 80 |
Page 81 |
Page 82 |
Page 83 |
Page 84 |
Page 85 |
Page 86 |
Page 87 |
Page 88 |
Page 89 |
Page 90 |
Page 91 |
Page 92 |
Page 93 |
Page 94 |
Page 95 |
Page 96 |
Page 97 |
Page 98 |
Page 99 |
Page 100 |
Page 101 |
Page 102 |
Page 103 |
Page 104 |
Page 105 |
Page 106 |
Page 107 |
Page 108 |
Page 109 |
Page 110 |
Page 111 |
Page 112 |
Page 113 |
Page 114 |
Page 115 |
Page 116 |
Page 117 |
Page 118 |
Page 119 |
Page 120 |
Page 121 |
Page 122 |
Page 123 |
Page 124 |
Page 125 |
Page 126 |
Page 127 |
Page 128 |
Page 129 |
Page 130 |
Page 131 |
Page 132 |
Page 133 |
Page 134 |
Page 135 |
Page 136 |
Page 137 |
Page 138 |
Page 139 |
Page 140 |
Page 141 |
Page 142 |
Page 143 |
Page 144 |
Page 145 |
Page 146 |
Page 147 |
Page 148 |
Page 149 |
Page 150 |
Page 151 |
Page 152 |
Page 153 |
Page 154 |
Page 155 |
Page 156 |
Page 157 |
Page 158 |
Page 159 |
Page 160 |
Page 161