tribution of the index of the demographic attractiveness were to be found in 1990 – 2005, as numerous characteristics and consequences.
The severe decrease of the rural- urban flow between 1990 – 1991 and its constant position at superior values of the urban – rural flow between 1990 – 1996. Between 1996 – 2005, the residence movements from rural to urban areas were numerous.
The intensity of the migratory flows and the residence movement was bal- anced; after 1991, the effects were the increase in the number of peo- ple rejected from the urban area, from the labour market and who re- turned in the districts near the cities.
The residence movements of the population were determined by the so- cial rejection known as a consequence of the disorders and the eco- nomic and social insufficiencies which led
to dismissals, unemploy-
ment and early retirement. Firstly, the social rejection based on unem- ployment was stronger in the north – eastern, south-eastern and south- western developing regions. The best examples to illustrate where it could be found are Covasna, Buzau, Salaj, Tulcea, Brasov, Caras- Severin, Suceava. On the other hand, the lowest values that could be found were in Bistrita – Nasaud, Satu Mare, Arad, Brasov, Giurgiu, Alba and Bucharest. Secondly, the social exclusion, because of the dismissal, made its presence more obvious in getting down the values of the migratory total and the index of the demographic attractiveness in Dobrogea, Oltenia, Banat, Muntenia- especially in the following dis- tricts, like Bistrita-Nasaud, Harghita, Bacau, Giurgiu, Dambovita, Ca- larasi, Alba, Arad, Valcea – had lower values below the average.
The long distance migration from 1990 – 1991 was replaced by the short distance mobility, starting from 1992 when the migration between the districts developed, especially after 1995.
The areas that could include a greater number of residents in terms of demographic attractiveness have included Bucharest and some dis- tricts , as it follows: Timis, Arad, Cluj, Prahova, Dambovita, Valcea, Ar- ges, Constanta, Satu Mare, Mures. The migratory rate of the residence movements for people aged between 20 -24 years old and 25 – 29 years old, has the highest value, whereas the level of residence changes has decreased constantly for 35 year old people; obviously the figures decrease for 60-year old people.
The facts that caused a more obvious migration between 1990 – 1991 were based on the economic decline in addition to the personal reason which had been determined by variations of marriage rates. The main geographic areas (between 1990 – 2005) which received the newcomers were Bucharest and districts like Ilfov, Constanta, Arad. On the other side, the districts
people left were Vaslui, Hunedoara, Teleorman, Maramures, Botosani, Bistrita-Nasaud, Olt. 117
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36 |
Page 37 |
Page 38 |
Page 39 |
Page 40 |
Page 41 |
Page 42 |
Page 43 |
Page 44 |
Page 45 |
Page 46 |
Page 47 |
Page 48 |
Page 49 |
Page 50 |
Page 51 |
Page 52 |
Page 53 |
Page 54 |
Page 55 |
Page 56 |
Page 57 |
Page 58 |
Page 59 |
Page 60 |
Page 61 |
Page 62 |
Page 63 |
Page 64 |
Page 65 |
Page 66 |
Page 67 |
Page 68 |
Page 69 |
Page 70 |
Page 71 |
Page 72 |
Page 73 |
Page 74 |
Page 75 |
Page 76 |
Page 77 |
Page 78 |
Page 79 |
Page 80 |
Page 81 |
Page 82 |
Page 83 |
Page 84 |
Page 85 |
Page 86 |
Page 87 |
Page 88 |
Page 89 |
Page 90 |
Page 91 |
Page 92 |
Page 93 |
Page 94 |
Page 95 |
Page 96 |
Page 97 |
Page 98 |
Page 99 |
Page 100 |
Page 101 |
Page 102 |
Page 103 |
Page 104 |
Page 105 |
Page 106 |
Page 107 |
Page 108 |
Page 109 |
Page 110 |
Page 111 |
Page 112 |
Page 113 |
Page 114 |
Page 115 |
Page 116 |
Page 117 |
Page 118 |
Page 119 |
Page 120 |
Page 121 |
Page 122 |
Page 123 |
Page 124 |
Page 125 |
Page 126 |
Page 127 |
Page 128 |
Page 129 |
Page 130 |
Page 131 |
Page 132 |
Page 133 |
Page 134 |
Page 135 |
Page 136 |
Page 137 |
Page 138 |
Page 139 |
Page 140 |
Page 141 |
Page 142 |
Page 143 |
Page 144 |
Page 145 |
Page 146 |
Page 147 |
Page 148 |
Page 149 |
Page 150 |
Page 151 |
Page 152 |
Page 153 |
Page 154 |
Page 155 |
Page 156 |
Page 157 |
Page 158 |
Page 159 |
Page 160 |
Page 161