Engineering Speed
How NeverEnding Is Rewriting the Rules of iGaming Integration
Legacy iGaming infrastructure still slows integration timelines with outdated documentation, layered architectures and compliance friction. NeverEnding’s CTO,
Oleksandr Zaburannyi, explains why the real bottleneck isn’t talent - it’s systems - and how a clean-slate architecture built around MVP deployment, latency control and ownership is redefining integration speed in 2026.
In this conversation with Oleksandr Zaburannyi, NeverEnding’s CTO explains where integrations most often break down, why latency is still underestimated, and how a clean-slate architecture built around MVP deployment and ownership enables five-day integrations without sacrificing control.
Oleksandr, what are the biggest technical bottlenecks slowing integrations in 2026?
Te actual problem is a gap between well-written technical documentation and how the system works in reality.
Integration engineers often spend significant time building integrations based on the provided technical documentation and covering every possible edge case with tests, only to discover that the system doesn’t behave as described due to inaccurate or outdated docs. As a result, they end up reworking or rewriting the integration entirely.
In practice, this often translates into two weeks of development, one week waiting for access to a test environment, and up to another week for fixes. Only after that can partner testing begin, which may take an undefined amount of time. If both sides operate in sprint cycles, the overall timeline extends even further.
NeverEnding talks about five-day integrations and same-day 86
decisions. What makes that technically possible? To make that possible, three principles have to be in place:
1. MVP first - We deliver a workable integration as quickly as possible so we can begin testing with the partner early. We still use automated testing and careful manual testing, but full validation happens once we confirm the real API behaviour. Tis reduces unnecessary rework.
2. Continuous flow, not sprint dependency - Our integration team takes a Kanban approach rather than fixed sprint cycles. Tis allows us to adjust priorities in real time and keep integrations moving without waiting for the next sprint cycle.
3. Technical evolution - Delivering an MVP quickly would be impossible without a system designed for speed and flexibility. We’ve built a platform that enables integrations with minimal code and effort, but we continue to refine it and are now testing AI-driven approaches to make the process even more efficient. I believe integrations should take hours, not days, and we’re actively working toward that goal.
Did you intentionally build a clean-slate architecture? Yes. Each regulation requires its own technical solution, and
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36 |
Page 37 |
Page 38 |
Page 39 |
Page 40 |
Page 41 |
Page 42 |
Page 43 |
Page 44 |
Page 45 |
Page 46 |
Page 47 |
Page 48 |
Page 49 |
Page 50 |
Page 51 |
Page 52 |
Page 53 |
Page 54 |
Page 55 |
Page 56 |
Page 57 |
Page 58 |
Page 59 |
Page 60 |
Page 61 |
Page 62 |
Page 63 |
Page 64 |
Page 65 |
Page 66 |
Page 67 |
Page 68 |
Page 69 |
Page 70 |
Page 71 |
Page 72 |
Page 73 |
Page 74 |
Page 75 |
Page 76 |
Page 77 |
Page 78 |
Page 79 |
Page 80 |
Page 81 |
Page 82 |
Page 83 |
Page 84 |
Page 85 |
Page 86 |
Page 87 |
Page 88 |
Page 89 |
Page 90 |
Page 91 |
Page 92 |
Page 93 |
Page 94 |
Page 95 |
Page 96 |
Page 97 |
Page 98 |
Page 99 |
Page 100 |
Page 101 |
Page 102 |
Page 103 |
Page 104 |
Page 105 |
Page 106 |
Page 107 |
Page 108 |
Page 109 |
Page 110 |
Page 111 |
Page 112 |
Page 113 |
Page 114 |
Page 115 |
Page 116 |
Page 117 |
Page 118 |
Page 119 |
Page 120 |
Page 121 |
Page 122 |
Page 123 |
Page 124 |
Page 125 |
Page 126 |
Page 127 |
Page 128 |
Page 129 |
Page 130 |
Page 131 |
Page 132 |
Page 133 |
Page 134 |
Page 135 |
Page 136 |
Page 137 |
Page 138 |
Page 139 |
Page 140 |
Page 141 |
Page 142 |
Page 143 |
Page 144 |
Page 145 |
Page 146 |
Page 147 |
Page 148 |
Page 149 |
Page 150 |
Page 151 |
Page 152 |
Page 153 |
Page 154 |
Page 155 |
Page 156 |
Page 157 |
Page 158 |
Page 159 |
Page 160 |
Page 161 |
Page 162 |
Page 163 |
Page 164 |
Page 165 |
Page 166 |
Page 167 |
Page 168 |
Page 169 |
Page 170 |
Page 171 |
Page 172 |
Page 173 |
Page 174 |
Page 175 |
Page 176 |
Page 177 |
Page 178 |
Page 179 |
Page 180 |
Page 181 |
Page 182
