This page contains a Flash digital edition of a book.
Page 82


www.us-tech.com


March, 2014 Advanced Drop-Jet Fluxing for Selective Soldering By Alan Cable, President, ACE Production Technologies, Inc., Spokane Valley, WA


solids-content fluxes, and water-soluble, alcohol- based, or rosin-based fluxes. Just as the choice between various lead-free solder alloys is often made according to the service-life requirements of a given end product, selection of a particular type of liquid flux is typically based on the end-user application. Electronics contract manufacturers (CMs) often have little control over the flux chem- istry to be used and therefore must be equipped to work with virtually any type of liquid flux. No-clean fluxes are increasingly used with


M


selective soldering equipment since the residues left after the solder operation are generally non-


any different flux chemistries are available when implementing selective soldering technology, including low pH fluxes, high-


conductive and noncorrosive, although they can leave a visible white residue. However, for many end-user applications no-clean fluxes require post- soldering cleaning to ensure that any residues are completely removed and will not adversely affect the electrical performance of a printed-circuit- board (PCB) assembly. Many no-clean fluxes contain active ingredi-


An advanced drop-jet flux dispenser is integrated side-by-side with a standard aerosol spray head.


ents such as mild organic acids that remain active from the time of application to a PCB until they are consumed by a reaction or volatized by heat. Most active ingredients within no-clean fluxes are burned off by direct contact with molten solder. Because of this, direct contact with the solder noz- zle of a selective soldering solder system is essen- tial to mitigate no-clean flux residues. Proper ther- mal processing is essential to ensure the level of any remaining flux residues is within acceptable limits or post-soldering cleaning will be required. Regardless of the type of selec-


tive soldering equipment used, three types of selective flux applica- tors are available: spray, ultrasonic, and drop-jet fluxers. The spray and ultrasonic fluxers apply atomized flux to a specific area. They are capable of high-speed flux deposi- tion, but apply a wide spray pattern which requires post-solder cleaning to remove flux residue outside the intended selective solder path. When using no-clean fluxes with selective soldering systems, the pre- ferred method for applying liquid flux is to use a drop-jet fluxer rather than an atomizing-type aerosol spray head or an ultrasonic spray fluxer. The drop-jet flux applicator applies small droplets of flux that remain within the path of the solder nozzle so that the no-clean residues are consumed by direct contact with the molten solder. This complete consumption of


no-clean flux residues when using selective soldering and a drop-jet flux applicator is a distinct advan- tage of selective soldering over wave soldering using aperture wave pal- lets since no-clean flux residues can- not become entrapped underneath wave pallets. While a drop-jet fluxer is more precise than the other types of fluxers, the choice of a drop-jet, aerosol, or ultrasonic flux applicator for selective soldering depends on the circumstances surrounding a particular soldering application.


Drop-Jet Technology Drop-jet technology provides


®


complete control of droplet size and low consumption of the liquid media being applied. Most commercial drop-jet spray fluxers are essential- ly exchangeable dispensing valves originally designed for a wide range of applications, including automo- tive, electronics, medical, and solar panel manufacturing. These com- mercial drop-jet spray fluxers were originally developed for industrial coding and marking applications using mainly inks, primers, and ink-based dyes. Adapting them as liquid flux applicators for selective soldering has been problematic at best since many liquid fluxes are more thixotropic than marking inks. To overcome the limitations of


available commercial drop-jet spray fluxers, an advanced drop-jet flux dispenser has been developed where all engineering, design, and fabrica- tion was under the direct control of


See at APEX, Booth 1027 Continued on next page


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116