search.noResults

search.searching

dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
Chapter 2 GLOBAL GENDER AND ENVIRONMENT OUTLOOK Introduction


Socially constructed gender roles create differences in the ways women and men behave in relation to the environment, and in the ways they are enabled to act (or prevented from acting) as agents of environmental change. Even relatively simple gender-based divisions of labour can affect how they experience the environment. If only men fish in the open sea and only women fish in coastal mangroves, they will inevitably have different sets of environmental knowledge and experiences. Or if most men drive to work in a car while most women use public transportation, they will see the environment and changes in it from different vantage points.


Their different environmental positioning may mean women and men have exposures to very different environmental problems and risks, and have very different ideas about the seriousness of environmental problems and appropriate interventions, adaptations and solutions. Further, because of the social construction of gender roles, they may have different – usually unequal – capacities and approaches with respect to environmental interpretation and change.


The GGEO methodology framework


At the heart of gender and environment analyses is curiosity about whether women and men (and girls and boys) experience “the environment” differently; how their needs, encounters, vulnerability, and resilience differ. This necessitates a basic curiosity about gender equality and inequality – how inequalities are created, perpetuated, and sometimes effectively challenged and changed.


The GGEO methodological model (Figure 2.1) shows the analytical flow among Drivers-Pressures-State- Effects/Impacts-Response/Policies, which are mediated through Knowledge/Perceptions including traditional and indigenous knowledge. These inform the Outlook on the transformative changes needed to achieve a sustainable and just future.


22


To emphasize its people-oriented character and address the key challenge of lack of gender-disaggregated information in many of the assessed areas, the GGEO methodology employs several analytical approaches:


Figure 2.1: GGEO methodological model DRIVERS


e.g., population dynamics, social norms; types of economic growth; unequal


distribution of resources


STATE AND TRENDS


of gender and environment linkages


KNOWLEDGE AND


PERCEPTION


OUTLOOK


RESPONSE AND POLICY


Innovation; social action; gender empowerment


IMPACTS AND EFFECTS Health;


ecosystem; economic loss; gender inequality


Source: Seager (2014)


• A human-centred analytical approach: It is essential for gendered environmental analysis to put people first, redefining environmental relationships through the lens of social relationships and in the context of human economic activities rather than defining the environment primarily in physical terms.


• Incorporating the social construction of knowledge: Shifting the boundaries of environmental assessment to include qualitative and quantitative information broadens the range of expertise on which we can draw. The need to include different “ways of knowing” has been acknowledged in previous Global Environment Outlooks (GEO), primarily through recognizing indigenous perspectives and traditional knowledge (UNEP 2012). Responses to environmental problems do not follow a straight line from facts about the environment. Among other social forces, perceptions intervene, and these are almost always gender-differentiated.


• “Lifting the roof off the household”: “Household”-based,


environmentally relevant


decisions and behaviours are negotiated, often unequally, between women and men inside households – on matters such as water use, the division of labour, energy-source choices, and financial allocations for agricultural adaptation. Intra-household dynamics are critically important in terms of the use, conservation and consumption of resources, as well as the ways women and men (may) act as agents of change. All environmentally consequential decisions made within households are filtered through gender norms and roles.


p


r


e


s


s


u


r


e


s


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116  |  Page 117  |  Page 118  |  Page 119  |  Page 120  |  Page 121  |  Page 122  |  Page 123  |  Page 124  |  Page 125  |  Page 126  |  Page 127  |  Page 128  |  Page 129  |  Page 130  |  Page 131  |  Page 132  |  Page 133  |  Page 134  |  Page 135  |  Page 136  |  Page 137  |  Page 138  |  Page 139  |  Page 140  |  Page 141  |  Page 142  |  Page 143  |  Page 144  |  Page 145  |  Page 146  |  Page 147  |  Page 148  |  Page 149  |  Page 150  |  Page 151  |  Page 152  |  Page 153  |  Page 154  |  Page 155  |  Page 156  |  Page 157  |  Page 158  |  Page 159  |  Page 160  |  Page 161  |  Page 162  |  Page 163  |  Page 164  |  Page 165  |  Page 166  |  Page 167  |  Page 168  |  Page 169  |  Page 170  |  Page 171  |  Page 172  |  Page 173  |  Page 174  |  Page 175  |  Page 176  |  Page 177  |  Page 178  |  Page 179  |  Page 180  |  Page 181  |  Page 182  |  Page 183  |  Page 184  |  Page 185  |  Page 186  |  Page 187  |  Page 188  |  Page 189  |  Page 190  |  Page 191  |  Page 192  |  Page 193  |  Page 194  |  Page 195  |  Page 196  |  Page 197  |  Page 198  |  Page 199  |  Page 200  |  Page 201  |  Page 202  |  Page 203  |  Page 204  |  Page 205  |  Page 206  |  Page 207  |  Page 208  |  Page 209  |  Page 210  |  Page 211  |  Page 212  |  Page 213  |  Page 214  |  Page 215  |  Page 216  |  Page 217  |  Page 218  |  Page 219  |  Page 220  |  Page 221  |  Page 222  |  Page 223  |  Page 224  |  Page 225  |  Page 226  |  Page 227  |  Page 228  |  Page 229  |  Page 230  |  Page 231  |  Page 232  |  Page 233  |  Page 234  |  Page 235  |  Page 236  |  Page 237  |  Page 238  |  Page 239  |  Page 240  |  Page 241  |  Page 242