search.noResults

search.searching

dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
2.4 SUSTAINABLE CONSUMPTION AND PRODUCTION


amounts of e-waste processed result in adverse health and environmental impacts, including contaminated soil and surface water (Tsydenova and Bengtsson 2011; Frazzoli et al. 2010; Zhao et al. 2010; Wang et al. 2009). Recyclers’ reported health problems include diseases and problems related to the skin, stomach, respiratory tract and other organs (Nordbrand 2009). Workers suffer high incidences of birth defects, infant mortality, tuberculosis, blood diseases, anomalies in the immune system, malfunctioning of the kidneys and respiratory system, lung cancer, underdevelopment of the brain in children, and damage to the nervous and blood systems (Prakash and Manhart 2010). Through air sampling in Taizhou, a giant e-waste dismantling complex employing over 60,000 people in Zhejiang, China, researchers linked uncontrolled handling and processing of e-waste to adverse human health effects including inflammatory responses, DNA damage and cardiovascular disease (IOP 2011). In Accra, Ghana, increased levels of polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) and polybrominated diphenyl ethers (PBDEs) in breast milk samples were linked to informal e-waste recycling activities (Asante et al. 2011).


Overall, of particular concern is the exposure of children and pregnant women to lead, mercury, cadmium and other heavy metals, as even relatively low exposure levels can cause serious and, in some cases, irreversible neurological damage (Lundgren 2012; WHO 2010). However, there is not even a reliable profile of workers in the global e-waste industry; anecdotal evidence indicates high involvement of women and children, but the nature of the e-waste varies considerably from place to place.


Transformational change – moving forward


Sustainable consumption and production decouples economic growth from environmental degradation (UNEP 2012a). To achieve a sustainable future, (gender- equitable) improvements to quality of life need to be made without increasing environmental degradation or compromising progress towards gender equality. This is a major challenge, but there are promising signs: governments are committed to achieve the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs); at the Paris climate change talks they agreed on a long-term goal to keep the average global temperature increase well below 2°C compared with pre-industrial levels, and to aim to


limit the increase to 1.5°C; and everywhere citizens are organizing to create sustainable change in local communities and in their personal lives.


Consistently and across national assessments,


research findings point to gender differences – often significant ones – in social and economic development, consumption patterns, access to (and use of) knowledge, approaches to environmental issues, ecological footprints, environmental management, and use of, access to and control of resources (ILO 2015; UN Women 2013). These differences suggest women could be the more engaged demographic group for bringing sustainability forward:


• A European Union survey asked if people were willing to pay more for less polluting transportation: 43% of men and 39% of women said they were not prepared to do so; 48% of women and 42% of men were willing to pay up to 10% more (Eurobarometer 2007);


• A cross-ethnic survey of Asian and Caucasian Americans found that gender is relevant to environmental attitudes and behaviour: women expressed more


concern about environmental


problems than men because of their potential impacts on others, the biosphere and themselves (Burn et al. 2012);


• A meta-analysis of research on gender and


environmental attitudes in 14 countries found that women consistently reported stronger pro- environmental behaviour and attitudes (Zelezny et al. 2000);


• Studies in Germany have shown that women are more likely to be conscious of and act on sustainable consumption than men (Costa Pinto et al. 2014);


• A preliminary study in the United Arab Emirates recently found that women are more focused than men on purchasing and consuming products which are environmentally friendly and more aware of conserving energy and other natural resources (Kahn and Triverdi 2015).


Findings such as these point to the need to engage women as well as men in planning for a sustainable future and indicate that women are well-positioned to


119


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116  |  Page 117  |  Page 118  |  Page 119  |  Page 120  |  Page 121  |  Page 122  |  Page 123  |  Page 124  |  Page 125  |  Page 126  |  Page 127  |  Page 128  |  Page 129  |  Page 130  |  Page 131  |  Page 132  |  Page 133  |  Page 134  |  Page 135  |  Page 136  |  Page 137  |  Page 138  |  Page 139  |  Page 140  |  Page 141  |  Page 142  |  Page 143  |  Page 144  |  Page 145  |  Page 146  |  Page 147  |  Page 148  |  Page 149  |  Page 150  |  Page 151  |  Page 152  |  Page 153  |  Page 154  |  Page 155  |  Page 156  |  Page 157  |  Page 158  |  Page 159  |  Page 160  |  Page 161  |  Page 162  |  Page 163  |  Page 164  |  Page 165  |  Page 166  |  Page 167  |  Page 168  |  Page 169  |  Page 170  |  Page 171  |  Page 172  |  Page 173  |  Page 174  |  Page 175  |  Page 176  |  Page 177  |  Page 178  |  Page 179  |  Page 180  |  Page 181  |  Page 182  |  Page 183  |  Page 184  |  Page 185  |  Page 186  |  Page 187  |  Page 188  |  Page 189  |  Page 190  |  Page 191  |  Page 192  |  Page 193  |  Page 194  |  Page 195  |  Page 196  |  Page 197  |  Page 198  |  Page 199  |  Page 200  |  Page 201  |  Page 202  |  Page 203  |  Page 204  |  Page 205  |  Page 206  |  Page 207  |  Page 208  |  Page 209  |  Page 210  |  Page 211  |  Page 212  |  Page 213  |  Page 214  |  Page 215  |  Page 216  |  Page 217  |  Page 218  |  Page 219  |  Page 220  |  Page 221  |  Page 222  |  Page 223  |  Page 224  |  Page 225  |  Page 226  |  Page 227  |  Page 228  |  Page 229  |  Page 230  |  Page 231  |  Page 232  |  Page 233  |  Page 234  |  Page 235  |  Page 236  |  Page 237  |  Page 238  |  Page 239  |  Page 240  |  Page 241  |  Page 242