Forest GLOBAL GENDER AND ENVIRONMENT OUTLOOK Energy Chapter 2
study. Centro de Estudios e Investigacion de Derecho Rural y Reforma Agrara de la Universidad Catolica de Asuncion
http://globalforestcoalition.org/wp-content/ uploads/2014/05/paraguay_case_study_final-compressed-1. pdf
Mahanty, S. and McDermott, C. (2013). ‘How does ‘Free, Prior and Informed Consent’(FPIC) impact social equity?- Lessons from mining and forestry and their implications for REDD+’. Land Use Policy 35, 406-416. doi: 10.1016/j. landusepol.2013.06.014
http://www.sciencedirect.com/ science/article/pii/S0264837713001294
Marcoes, L., Fauzi-Rachman, N., Sirimorok, N. and Toumbourou, T. (2015). Achieving gender justice in Indone- sia’s forests and land governance sector: How civil society organisations can respond to mining and plantation industry impacts. The Asia Foundation Jakarta https://asiafoundation. org/resources/pdfs/IDGenderJusticeForestry.pdf
Margono, B.A., Potapov, P.V., Turubanova, S., Stolle, F. and Hansen, M.C. (2014). ‘Primary forest loss in Indonesia over 2000-2012’. Nature Climate Change 4, 730-735. doi: 10.1038/nclimate2277
http://www.nature.com/nclimate/ journal/v4/n8/full/
nclimate2277.html
Marshall, E., Schreckenberg, K. and Newton, A.C. (2006). Commercialization of Non-Timber Forest Products: Factors Influencing Success. Lessons Learned from Mexico and Bolivia and Policy Implications for Decision-Makers. United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP) World Conserva- tion Monitoring Centre (WCMC) Cambridge http://www.
odi.org/sites/odi.org.uk/files/odi-assets/publications-opin- ion-files/3769.pdf
Maryudi, A. and Krott, M. (2012). ‘Poverty alleviation efforts through a community forestry program in Java, Indonesia’. Journal of Sustainable Development 5(2), 43-53 http://www.
ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/jsd/article/view/13801
Mhinda, A. (2016). “Can mining dig rural women out of poverty in Ghana?” (blog), International Institute for Envi- ronment and Development, London, 8 March, www.iied. org/can-mining-dig-rural-women-out-poverty-ghana
Mohanty, R. (2004). ‘Institutional dynamics and participa- tory spaces: The making and unmaking of participation in local forest management in India’. IDS Bulletin 35(2), 26-32. doi: 10.1111/j.1759-5436.2004.tb00118.x
http://dx.doi. org/10.1111/j.1759-5436.2004.tb00118.x
Mulyoutami, E., Martini, E., Khususiyah, N. and Suyanto, I. (2013). Gender, livelihood and land in South and Southeast Sulawesi. ICRAF Working paper no. 158. World Agroforestry Centre, Bogor
http://www.worldagroforestry.org/downloads/ Publications/PDFS/WP12057.pdf
Mutter, R.M. and Overbeek, W. (2011). The great lie: Monoculture trees as forests. United Nations Research Institute for Social Development http://www.unrisd. org/80256B3C005BE6B5/search/531DAFFB8B319F- 69C125792E00499ED1?OpenDocument
Mwangi, E., Meinzen-Dick, R. and Sun, Y. (2011). Gender and sustainable forest management in East Africa and Latin
America.Center for International Forestry Research (CIFOR), Bogor.
http://www.cifor.org/nc/online-library/browse/ view-publication/publication/
3343.html
170
Natural Justice Videos (2016). Rooibos robbery: A story of bioprospecting in South Africa Natural Justice Videos’s channel,
http://naturaljustice.org/video/rooibos-robbery-a- story-of-bioprospecting-in-south-africa/
Nightingale, A. (2003). ‘A feminist in the forest: Situated knowledges and mixing methods in natural resource
management’. ACME: An International E-Journal for Critical Geographies 2(1), 77-91
http://ojs.unbc.ca/index.php/acme/ article/view/709/572
Niraj, S.K. (2009). Sustainable development, poaching, and illegal wildlife trade in India. Doctor of philosophy with a major in renewable natural resources studies, The Univer- sity of Arizona
http://arizona.openrepository.com/arizona/ bitstream/10150/194196/1/azu_etd_10375_sip1_m.pdf
Odeny, M. (2013). ‘Improving access to land and strength- ening women’s land rights in Africa’. Annual World Bank Conference on Land and Poverty. Washington, D.C., 8-11 April 2013. World Bank 22
http://web.law.columbia.edu/ sites/default/files/microsites/gender-sexuality/odeny_improv- ing_access_to_land_in_africa.pdf
Odusola, A.F. (2014). Land Grab in Africa: A Review of Emerging Issues and Implications for Policy Options. Working Paper Number 124. International Policy Centre for Inclusive Growth, UNDP, New York
www.ipc-undp.org/pub/ IPCWorkingPaper124
OECD (2014). DAC network on governance. GIZ and BMZ combating poaching and the illegal wildlife trade in Africa and Asia for the anti-corruption task team. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, Paris http://
www.oecd.org/officialdocuments/publicdisplaydocumentpd- f/?cote=DCD/DAC/GOVNET(2014)10&docLanguage=En
O’Faircheallaigh, C. (2013). ‘Community development agreements in the mining industry: An emerging global phenomenon’. Community Development 44(2), 222-238. doi: 10.1080/15575330.2012.705872 http://www.tandfon-
line.com/doi/abs/10.1080/15575330.2012.705872
Onta, N. (2012). “When pigs fly: why is including women in managing forests still so unusual?” (blog), International Institute for Environment and Development, London, 24 September,
www.iied.org/when-pigs-fly-why-including- women-managing-forests-still-so-unusual
OSISA (2015). Farming, mining and caring for the land: Why a critical feminist gender discourse on rights and resources is more important now than ever before. Open Society Initiative for Southern Africa
http://www.osisa.org/buwa/ economic-justice/regional/farming-mining-and-caring-land- why-critical-feminist-gender-discourse
Overbeek, W., Kroger, M. and Gerber, J.-F. (2012). An overview of industrial tree plantation conflicts in the global South. Conflicts, trends, and resistance struggles. Lohmann, L. (ed.). Environmental Justice Organisations, Liabilities and Trade (EJOLT)Report No. 3 , Brussels
http://wrm.org.uy/ wp-content/uploads/2013/01/EJOLTplantations.pdf
Pandit, R. and Bevilacqua, E. (2010). ‘Social heterogeneity and community forestry processes: Reflections from forest users of Dhading District, Nepal’. Small-scale Forestry 10(1), 97-113. doi: 10.1007/s11842-010-9136-9
http://dx.doi. org/10.1007/s11842-010-9136-9
Perch, L. and Byrd, R. (2015). Gender in the CSA discourse: Making the case for gender-smartness Rio+ World Centre for Sustainable Development, Rio de Janeiro https://rioplus-
centre.files.wordpress.com/2015/01/wp3_gender-in-the-csa- discourse_final-3.pdf
Rajaee, M., Obiri, S., Green, A., Long, A., Cobbina, S.J., Nartey, V., Buck, D., Antwi, E. and Basu, N. (2015). ‘Integrated assessment of artisanal and small-scale gold mining in ghana - part 2: Natural sciences review’. Interna- tional Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 12(8), 8971-9011. doi: 10.3390/ijerph120808971 http://
www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/12/8/8971
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36 |
Page 37 |
Page 38 |
Page 39 |
Page 40 |
Page 41 |
Page 42 |
Page 43 |
Page 44 |
Page 45 |
Page 46 |
Page 47 |
Page 48 |
Page 49 |
Page 50 |
Page 51 |
Page 52 |
Page 53 |
Page 54 |
Page 55 |
Page 56 |
Page 57 |
Page 58 |
Page 59 |
Page 60 |
Page 61 |
Page 62 |
Page 63 |
Page 64 |
Page 65 |
Page 66 |
Page 67 |
Page 68 |
Page 69 |
Page 70 |
Page 71 |
Page 72 |
Page 73 |
Page 74 |
Page 75 |
Page 76 |
Page 77 |
Page 78 |
Page 79 |
Page 80 |
Page 81 |
Page 82 |
Page 83 |
Page 84 |
Page 85 |
Page 86 |
Page 87 |
Page 88 |
Page 89 |
Page 90 |
Page 91 |
Page 92 |
Page 93 |
Page 94 |
Page 95 |
Page 96 |
Page 97 |
Page 98 |
Page 99 |
Page 100 |
Page 101 |
Page 102 |
Page 103 |
Page 104 |
Page 105 |
Page 106 |
Page 107 |
Page 108 |
Page 109 |
Page 110 |
Page 111 |
Page 112 |
Page 113 |
Page 114 |
Page 115 |
Page 116 |
Page 117 |
Page 118 |
Page 119 |
Page 120 |
Page 121 |
Page 122 |
Page 123 |
Page 124 |
Page 125 |
Page 126 |
Page 127 |
Page 128 |
Page 129 |
Page 130 |
Page 131 |
Page 132 |
Page 133 |
Page 134 |
Page 135 |
Page 136 |
Page 137 |
Page 138 |
Page 139 |
Page 140 |
Page 141 |
Page 142 |
Page 143 |
Page 144 |
Page 145 |
Page 146 |
Page 147 |
Page 148 |
Page 149 |
Page 150 |
Page 151 |
Page 152 |
Page 153 |
Page 154 |
Page 155 |
Page 156 |
Page 157 |
Page 158 |
Page 159 |
Page 160 |
Page 161 |
Page 162 |
Page 163 |
Page 164 |
Page 165 |
Page 166 |
Page 167 |
Page 168 |
Page 169 |
Page 170 |
Page 171 |
Page 172 |
Page 173 |
Page 174 |
Page 175 |
Page 176 |
Page 177 |
Page 178 |
Page 179 |
Page 180 |
Page 181 |
Page 182 |
Page 183 |
Page 184 |
Page 185 |
Page 186 |
Page 187 |
Page 188 |
Page 189 |
Page 190 |
Page 191 |
Page 192 |
Page 193 |
Page 194 |
Page 195 |
Page 196 |
Page 197 |
Page 198 |
Page 199 |
Page 200 |
Page 201 |
Page 202 |
Page 203 |
Page 204 |
Page 205 |
Page 206 |
Page 207 |
Page 208 |
Page 209 |
Page 210 |
Page 211 |
Page 212 |
Page 213 |
Page 214 |
Page 215 |
Page 216 |
Page 217 |
Page 218 |
Page 219 |
Page 220 |
Page 221 |
Page 222 |
Page 223 |
Page 224 |
Page 225 |
Page 226 |
Page 227 |
Page 228 |
Page 229 |
Page 230 |
Page 231 |
Page 232 |
Page 233 |
Page 234 |
Page 235 |
Page 236 |
Page 237 |
Page 238 |
Page 239 |
Page 240 |
Page 241 |
Page 242
