Forest GLOBAL GENDER AND ENVIRONMENT OUTLOOK Energy Chapter 2


tute for Environment and Development, London http://pubs. iied.org/pdfs/16530IIED.pdf


CBD (2011). Nagoya protocol on access to genetic resources and the fair and equitable sharing of benefits arising from their utilization to the convention on biological diversity Convention on Biological Diversity, Quebec https://www. cbd.int/abs/doc/protocol/nagoya-protocol-en.pdf


Chao, S. (2012). Forest Peoples: Numbers across the world. Forest Peoples Programme, Moreton-in-Marsh http://www. forestpeoples.org/sites/fpp/files/publication/2012/05/forest- peoples-numbers-across-world-final_0.pdf


CIFOR (2016). About CIFOR. Center for International Forestry Research http://www.cifor.org/about-cifor/


CITES (2016). African elephants in decline due to high levels of poaching (3 March 2016) https://cites.org/eng/news/pr/ african_elephants_still_in_decline_due_to_high_levels_of_ poaching_03032016


Coleman, E. and Mwangi, E. (2015). ‘Gender and local environmental governance’. XIV World Forestry Congress. Durban, 7-11 September 2015. http://foris. fao.org/wfc2015/api/file/5547556ee52d79267e89a589/ contents/20c78d11-4edc-453e-91ac-88867f394fb4.pdf


Coleman, E.A. and Mwangi, E. (2013). ‘Women’s participa- tion in forest management: A cross-country analysis’. Global Environmental Change 23(1), 193-205. doi: 10.1016/j. gloenvcha.2012.10.005 http://www.sciencedirect.com/ science/article/pii/S0959378012001185


Cordy, P., Veiga, M.M., Salih, I., Al-Saadi, S., Console, S., Garcia, O., Mesa, L.A., Velasquez-Lopez, P.C. and Roeser, M.C. (2011). ‘Mercury contamination from artisanal gold mining in Antioquia, Colombia: The world’s highest per capita mercury pollution’. Science of the Total Environment 410-411, 154-160. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2011.09.006 http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/ S0048969711010059


Cotula, L., Vermeulen, S., Leonard, R. and Keeley, J. (2009). Land grab or development opportunity? Agricultural invest- ment and international land deals in Africa. FAO, IIED and IFAD http://pubs.iied.org/pdfs/12561IIED.pdf


Dancer, H. and Tsikata, D. (2015). Commercial agriculture in sub-sahara agriculture with a gender perspective: Concepts, issues and methods, Land and Agricultural Com- merciali- sation in Africa (LACA) Working Paper 132. Future Agricul- tures Consortium Secretariat,University of Sussex, Brighton http://eprints.brighton.ac.uk/15017/


D’Cruze, N., Singh, B., Morrison, T., Schmidt-Burbach, J., Macdonald, D.W. and Mookerjee, A. (2015). ‘A star attraction: The illegal trade in Indian Star Tortoises’. Nature Conservation 13, 1-19. doi: 10.3897/natureconserva- tion.13.5625 http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/natureconserva- tion.13.5625


De Schutter, O. (2009). Large-scale land acquisitions and leases: A set of core principles and measures to address the human rights challenge. United Nations http://www2.ohchr. org/english/issues/food/docs/BriefingNotelandgrab.pdf


168


Deininger, K. and Byerlee, D. (2011). Rising global interest in farmland: Can it yield sustainable and equitable benefits? World Bank, Washington, D.C. http://siteresources.world- bank.org/DEC/Resources/Rising-Global-Interest-in-Farmland. pdf


Dhiaulhaq, A., Gritten, D., De Bruyn, T., Yasmi, Y., Zazali, A. and Silalahi, M. (2014). ‘Transforming conflict in plantations through mediation: Lessons and experiences from Sumat- era, Indonesia’. Forest Policy and Economics 41, 22-30. doi:


10.1016/j.forpol.2014.01.003 http://www.sciencedirect. com/science/article/pii/S1389934114000161


Djoudi, H. and Brockhaus, M. (2011). Is adaptation to climate change gender neutral?: Lessons from communities dependent on livestock and forests in northern Mali. Center for International Forestry Research (CIFOR), Bogor http:// www.cifor.org/nc/online-library/browse/view-publication/ publication/3524.html


Dolisca, F., McDaniel, J.M., Shannon, D.A. and Jolly, C.M. (2009). ‘A multilevel analysis of the determi- nants of forest conservation behavior among farmers in Haiti’. Society & Natural Resources 22(5), 433-447. doi: 10.1080/08941920802064448 http://www.tandfonline. com/doi/abs/10.1080/08941920802064448


EC (2007). Attitudes on issues Related to EU Energy Policy; Analytical Report. European Commission, Brussels http:// ec.europa.eu/public_opinion/flash/fl206a_en.pdf


Ewing, M. and Msangi, S. (2009). ‘Biofuels production in developing countries: assessing tradeoffs in welfare and food security’. Environmental Science & Policy 12(4), 520-528. doi: 10.1016/j.envsci.2008.10.002 http://www. sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1462901108001123


FAO (2008). Gender and equity issues in liquid biofuels production: Minimizing the risks to maximize the opportuni- ties. Rossi, A. and Lambrou, Y. (eds.). Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), Rome ftp://ftp. fao.org/docrep/fao/010/ai503e/ai503e00.pdf


FAO (2011). About non-wood forest products. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) Rome http://www.fao.org/forestry/nwfp/6388/en/


FAO (2014). State of the World’s Forests 2014. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), Rome http://www.fao.org/3/a-i3710e.pdf


FAO (n.d.). Numbers of forest ‘dependent’ people and types of forest relationships. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) Rome http://www.fao.org/docrep/ w7732e/w7732e04.htm


Fisher, R.J., Victor, M. and Kijtewachakul, N. (1997). People and forests in Asia and the Pacific: Situation and prospects. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations Rome http://www.fao.org/publications/card/en/c/7b209267- 98a2-5a08-ad1a-27030d602957/


FOEI (2009). Negative impacts of monoculture tree planta- tions on women. Friends of the Earth International (8 March 2009) http://www.foei.org/press/archive-by-subject/ food-sovereignty-press/negative-impacts-of-monoculture- tree-plantations-on-women


Forest Peoples Programme (2016). Free, prior and informed consent. Forest Peoples Programme http://www.forestpeo- ples.org/guiding-principles/free-prior-and-informed-consent- fpic


Forestry Nepal (2016). Forest user groups. Forestry Nepal http://www.forestrynepal.org/wiki/138


Giri, K. (2012). Gender in forest tenure: Prerequisite for sustainable forest management in Nepal. Rights and Resources Institute (RRI), Washington, D.C http://thered- ddesk.org/sites/default/files/resources/pdf/2012/gender_in_ forest_tenure_-_forest_management_nepal.pdf


Giri, K. and Darnhofer, I. (2010). ‘Outmigrating men: A window of opportunity for women’s participation in community forestry?’ Scandinavian journal of forest research 25, 55-61 https://www.researchgate.net/journal/0282- 7581_Scandinavian_Journal_of_Forest_Research


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116  |  Page 117  |  Page 118  |  Page 119  |  Page 120  |  Page 121  |  Page 122  |  Page 123  |  Page 124  |  Page 125  |  Page 126  |  Page 127  |  Page 128  |  Page 129  |  Page 130  |  Page 131  |  Page 132  |  Page 133  |  Page 134  |  Page 135  |  Page 136  |  Page 137  |  Page 138  |  Page 139  |  Page 140  |  Page 141  |  Page 142  |  Page 143  |  Page 144  |  Page 145  |  Page 146  |  Page 147  |  Page 148  |  Page 149  |  Page 150  |  Page 151  |  Page 152  |  Page 153  |  Page 154  |  Page 155  |  Page 156  |  Page 157  |  Page 158  |  Page 159  |  Page 160  |  Page 161  |  Page 162  |  Page 163  |  Page 164  |  Page 165  |  Page 166  |  Page 167  |  Page 168  |  Page 169  |  Page 170  |  Page 171  |  Page 172  |  Page 173  |  Page 174  |  Page 175  |  Page 176  |  Page 177  |  Page 178  |  Page 179  |  Page 180  |  Page 181  |  Page 182  |  Page 183  |  Page 184  |  Page 185  |  Page 186  |  Page 187  |  Page 188  |  Page 189  |  Page 190  |  Page 191  |  Page 192  |  Page 193  |  Page 194  |  Page 195  |  Page 196  |  Page 197  |  Page 198  |  Page 199  |  Page 200  |  Page 201  |  Page 202  |  Page 203  |  Page 204  |  Page 205  |  Page 206  |  Page 207  |  Page 208  |  Page 209  |  Page 210  |  Page 211  |  Page 212  |  Page 213  |  Page 214  |  Page 215  |  Page 216  |  Page 217  |  Page 218  |  Page 219  |  Page 220  |  Page 221  |  Page 222  |  Page 223  |  Page 224  |  Page 225  |  Page 226  |  Page 227  |  Page 228  |  Page 229  |  Page 230  |  Page 231  |  Page 232  |  Page 233  |  Page 234  |  Page 235  |  Page 236  |  Page 237  |  Page 238  |  Page 239  |  Page 240  |  Page 241  |  Page 242