search.noResults

search.searching

dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
CASE STUDY F 3.3 Changing Migratory


Patterns in Ireland Troughout Irish history, migration trends have been greatly impacted on by the economic situation of the country. In times of economic growth, Ireland has experienced high levels of net immigration – along with high levels of net emigration during economic recession. Our migratory history dates back to the Great Famine (1845–9) in which over 1 million people died and 1 million people emigrated. Te Irish emigrated to countries such as the US, Canada, Britain and Australia, as these were English-speaking countries. Te majority of emigrants at this time came from the West of Ireland and other undeveloped rural areas. Tis emigration had a major impact on marriage and birth rates: they declined greatly, as the majority of emigrants were young females. Aſter the Famine, emigration continued. Tis, combined with older marriage ages and reduced birth rates, caused population decline.


Emigration: 1950s


Ireland experienced a deep economic recession throughout the 1950s, which led to roughly 408,000 people emigrating between 1951 and 1961. Te people who leſt during this period were economic migrants who leſt in search of work – particularly in Britain and the US, since both of those countries were experiencing economic booms at that time. By 1961, the Republic of Ireland’s population had fallen to 2.82 million from a high of 6.5 million in 1841. As it was mainly young people from rural Ireland who were leaving, these areas became severely depopulated and developed high dependency ratios.


: Fig. 3.6 Irish men and women emigrating from 1950s Ireland.


Immigration: 1960s and 1970s


Tis was a period of economic prosperity, as Ireland began to experience rapid economic development. As a result, Ireland experienced a reversal in migration patterns: emigration from Ireland decreased steadily, while immigration increased. Tis allowed Ireland to experience a slight net immigration for the first time in over 120 years as more job opportunities became available.


Over 58,000 people emigrated in 1958 alone: This was the worst year on record for emigration of Irish people.


During this time, the then Taoiseach – Sean Lemass – launched several programmes for economic expansion, as foreign direct investment and free trade were promoted through attractive grants, newly built industrial estates and financial incentives, e.g. tax-free exports. As a result of this, manufacturing jobs were created through large MNCs who were attracted to Ireland. Outward migration decreased as there were large employment increases throughout the country with over 300 foreign companies operating in Ireland by 1966.


74 ELECTIVE 5 PATTERNS AND PROCESSES IN THE HUMAN ENVIRONMENT


Note!


This question appears very frequently on both the Higher and Ordinary Level papers. More recent questions on the topic have asked students to begin discussing migratory patterns in Ireland from 1950 onwards.


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116  |  Page 117  |  Page 118  |  Page 119  |  Page 120  |  Page 121  |  Page 122  |  Page 123  |  Page 124  |  Page 125  |  Page 126  |  Page 127  |  Page 128  |  Page 129  |  Page 130  |  Page 131  |  Page 132  |  Page 133  |  Page 134  |  Page 135  |  Page 136  |  Page 137  |  Page 138  |  Page 139  |  Page 140  |  Page 141  |  Page 142  |  Page 143  |  Page 144  |  Page 145  |  Page 146  |  Page 147  |  Page 148  |  Page 149  |  Page 150  |  Page 151  |  Page 152  |  Page 153  |  Page 154  |  Page 155  |  Page 156  |  Page 157  |  Page 158  |  Page 159  |  Page 160  |  Page 161  |  Page 162  |  Page 163  |  Page 164  |  Page 165  |  Page 166  |  Page 167  |  Page 168  |  Page 169  |  Page 170  |  Page 171  |  Page 172  |  Page 173  |  Page 174  |  Page 175  |  Page 176  |  Page 177  |  Page 178  |  Page 179  |  Page 180  |  Page 181  |  Page 182  |  Page 183  |  Page 184  |  Page 185  |  Page 186  |  Page 187  |  Page 188  |  Page 189  |  Page 190  |  Page 191  |  Page 192  |  Page 193  |  Page 194