search.noResults

search.searching

dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
terraced housing. These residents are better off than those who live in zone of transition. Population densities are high in zone three, with many of the people here working in zone two.


l


Zone Four: This is a middle-class residential zone comprising detached or semi-detached houses with their own gardens. The residents here are middle to higher class.


l


Zone Five: This zone is a commuter zone made up of towns and villages on the outskirts of the city. These are high-class residential areas, with many of the residents of this zone travelling to the CBD for work.


Limitations of Burgess’s Model l


The Burgess model is old and outdated and is not relevant to many of today’s cities. It was based on the cities of 1920s America, where many migrants had settled in the poorer inner city areas. This had led to social stratification, whereby people with similar incomes settled in the same areas, therefore dividing the city according to class.


l


Furthermore, an increase in car ownership, along with advances in transport mean that many people now live outside of the city and then commute to work. This way of living was not considered when Burgess developed this theory.


l


Burgess failed to take into account the impact that physical landscape has on urban development. In real life, rivers, hills and valleys all affect the development of land.


l


Industrial estates, business parks and shopping centres did not exist when Burgess developed his model, but have since become important features of modern urban development.


l


The wealth of urban dwellers does not always increase with distance from city centres. Redevelopment can mean that inner city areas are renovated into expensive apartments, while low-income local authority housing estates can be found on the urban fringes of cities.


Theory 2: Sector Model ; Fig. 5.10 Sector model


Homer Hoyt developed this model in 1939 after studying rents paid for housing by people in many cities. He believed that, by mapping rent values, a pattern of different types of land use could be seen in urban areas. Hoyt’s model was based on Burgess’s model; however, Hoyt also took into account the impact of transport links of land use. Hoyt’s theory shows that cities develop along major transport routes that extend out from the city, such as roads, railway lines and canals. As a result of this, Hoyt’s model shows that towns have grown in sectors or wedges that radiate out from the CBD, with each sector reflecting a different zone of land use and income. As with Burgess’s theory, income and status divided the society of cities at the time, meaning people of different


Central Business District Wholesale light manufacturing Low-class residential Medium-class residential High-class residential


140 ELECTIVE 5 PATTERNS AND PROCESSES IN THE HUMAN ENVIRONMENT


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116  |  Page 117  |  Page 118  |  Page 119  |  Page 120  |  Page 121  |  Page 122  |  Page 123  |  Page 124  |  Page 125  |  Page 126  |  Page 127  |  Page 128  |  Page 129  |  Page 130  |  Page 131  |  Page 132  |  Page 133  |  Page 134  |  Page 135  |  Page 136  |  Page 137  |  Page 138  |  Page 139  |  Page 140  |  Page 141  |  Page 142  |  Page 143  |  Page 144  |  Page 145  |  Page 146  |  Page 147  |  Page 148  |  Page 149  |  Page 150  |  Page 151  |  Page 152  |  Page 153  |  Page 154  |  Page 155  |  Page 156  |  Page 157  |  Page 158  |  Page 159  |  Page 160  |  Page 161  |  Page 162  |  Page 163  |  Page 164  |  Page 165  |  Page 166  |  Page 167  |  Page 168  |  Page 169  |  Page 170  |  Page 171  |  Page 172  |  Page 173  |  Page 174  |  Page 175  |  Page 176  |  Page 177  |  Page 178  |  Page 179  |  Page 180  |  Page 181  |  Page 182  |  Page 183  |  Page 184  |  Page 185  |  Page 186  |  Page 187  |  Page 188  |  Page 189  |  Page 190  |  Page 191  |  Page 192  |  Page 193  |  Page 194