search.noResults

search.searching

saml.title
dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
16 ANALYSIS


Consumers and evolving sustainability concept


Claire Rance – The Pull Agency, UK


New data has revealed that almost three- quarters of UK consumers (71%) do not think brands and retailers are doing enough to make their beauty and personal care* purchases more sustainable. They also identified plastic waste as the main culprit – around half (46%) see it as the biggest sustainability challenge facing the industry.


What do consumers want to see? When asked what solution they most want to see, one in five consumers (19%) would like less packaging in their beauty and personal care products, while 17% would like more products with natural ingredients and 15% want in-store refill stations so they can re-use existing containers (rising to 18% among Generation Z). The other areas of interest are sustainable packaging (12%) and in-store recycling bins (11%).


The research also found that nine out of ten


shoppers (88%; rising to 93% of Generation Z) look for sustainability credentials in their beauty and personal care purchases and a third (32%) have deliberately chosen a sustainable brand in the past, up to 35% of Generation Z. However, 70% do not find brands’ current


sustainability claims helpful when it comes to choosing one product over another. Almost all of those surveyed (94%) think brands need to be more transparent about their sustainability credentials.


PERSONAL CARE September 2021


Who is influencing the conversation? At the same time, the data noted that brands that people know and trust are the biggest influence on whether or not people buy sustainable beauty products (23%), ahead of family and friends (22%), skincare/beauty professionals (16%) and influencers and bloggers (9%). Household-name broadcasters like Sir David Attenborough and activists like Greta Thunberg are barely an influence at all (3% and 2%, respectively). The survey of 2,000 UK consumers (93%


female) of all age groups was commissioned by The Pull Agency, a creative agency specialising in health and beauty brands. It noted that the UK’s three favourite sustainable brands in that sector are The Body Shop, Lush and Simple – but also that nine out of ten consumers (87%) have never heard of the concept of the ‘circular economy’.


Evolving sustainability concepts In recent years we have seen the evolution of sustainability move into a mission to create a


closed loop solution - the circular economy. This circular economy is an alternative to a traditional linear economy (make, use, dispose) in which we keep resources in use for as long as possible, extract the maximum value from them whilst in use, then recover and regenerate products and materials at the end of each service life. This is particularly important to the health & beauty industry due to the volume of hard-to-recycle materials used (think cosmetics compacts or face wipes) and single use plastics. One such company making this idea a


reality is TerraCycle. In their quest to make sustainability accessible, they created Loop, a never-before seen venture to combat single-use waste. They have teamed up with big businesses like Procter & Gamble and Tesco, so for the first time ever, consumers can receive their favourite products from trusted brands in durable, reusable packaging. With this


circular, durable system, actionable online, Loop


creates the first closed-loop retail shopping model.


www.personalcaremagazine.com


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92