search.noResults

search.searching

dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
Page 68


www.us- tech.com Production


Engineering Reliability Means Credibility


By Andy Naisbitt, Operations Director, Gen3 Systems G


en3 has been engineering and refining the CM series contaminometer for more than 40 years. Like all measurement systems, the difficulty lies in what is being measured. For example, light is measured by how


many candles produce a certain level of luminosity. But, what if the measure- ment must identify a potential impact on a process or product reliability? In the car industry, metal cannot be painted when the surface dew point


is closer than 5.4°F (3°C) to the ambient air temperature. This measurement is critical to the process finish, as the paint will not adhere well, due to an in- visible layer of moisture on the surface. The measurement is performed with a dew point meter that ensures the metal surfaces are 5.4°F (3°C) above the dew point prior to painting. The GEN3 CM series contaminometer measures the conductivity for an


equivalent weight of salt within a square centimeter of the circuit board to measure the effectiveness of a cleaning process for removing ionic contamina- tion from a PCB.


Why Measure? The closer the pitch of devices in today’s manufacturing — 0.012 in. (0.3


mm) or less — increases the electric field (E = V/d), which makes the electro- chemical corrosion cell potential more likely during local condensation in humid environments. The average size of dew droplet formation on surfaces at different tem-


peratures varies from 20 to 50 µm at about 50 percent relative humidity (RH) to large droplets of water at over 60 percent RH. Add in the natural capillary action under low-profile components with standoff heights of 25 µm and water bridge shorts become a reality. One table salt crystal weighs about 60 µg. This one tiny crystal, spread


thinly enough across a small PCB surface would be enough to fail early stan- dards, such as MIL-P-28809 — greater than 1.56 µg/cm2 or greater than 6.45 µg/in.2. Even invisible amounts of salt (or salt equivalent) left on the board can


present conditions suitable for electrochemical corrosion. Although we under- stand that the salt we are measuring may not be sodium chloride (baseline value), there are various known conversion factors that allow us to convert the baseline values for common PCB assembly contaminants. If there is a reading measurement of 1 µg NaCl/cm2 (salt), but we believe the contaminant to be carbonic acid residue, the equivalent for carbonic acid


would be 0.16 µg H2CO3/cm2, showing that a smaller amount of carbonic acid is more corrosive. Measurements need to be accurate and repeatable. We have the baseline


(salt), but how do we measure accurately with such small trace amounts and do it repeatedly to achieve a Gage R&R of less than 10? A method to achieve this should include: l


Variables with tight controls to measure such minute quantities. l Calibrated solution.


small changes in solution temperature. l


dissolve key components. l


l Temperature compensation, due to the sensitivity of the measurement to Flow rate as fast as practical, but not so fast that it generates turbulence.


February, 2020


l Measurement time of less than three minutes, as longer dwell times can Measurement accuracy of 0.005 µg NaCl/cm2, which is required to achieve


six sigma accuracy and repeatability. The issue with such sensitive measurements is that variables, such as


subtle changes in solution temperature, have an impact on the result. Expo- sure to air, even in the small cavity between the lid and solution can impact final readings. Even more so, high turbulence is experienced, which traps air


in the solution and rapidly dissolves CO2. The solution sounds simple — run the test as fast as possible. However,


run it too fast and bubbles are generated. This impacts the readings as the measurement cell is then measuring air (the bubbles) and not solution con- ductivity. Running it too slow results in extended time in the tank and water absorption into the laminate is enhanced by residues on its surface. Recent studies have shown that solder mask enhances the moisture up-


take of the laminate by four times. This correlates to a study by the European Space Agency, which found that extended exposure in an IPA/DI water solu- tion led to leaching the bromide flame retardant out of the laminate through the solder mask onto the board surface, severely degrading the material prop- erties of the PCB. The analysis of solution with trace levels of ionic matter requires the pre-


cision of a solid gold conductivity measurement cell, within a solid-state meas- uring cell, and connected to a ballistic amplifier. This and a powerful pump allows smooth flow throughout the operation, resulting in a six sigma repeat-


able measurement accuracy down to ±0.005 µg/cm2. Contact: Gen3 Systems, Ltd., Unit B2, Armstrong Mall, Southwood


Business Park, Hampshire, GU14 ONR, UK % +44-125-252-1500 E-mail: sales@gen3systems.com Web: www.gen3systems.com r


See at IPC APEX, Booth 1520


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116  |  Page 117  |  Page 118  |  Page 119  |  Page 120  |  Page 121  |  Page 122  |  Page 123  |  Page 124  |  Page 125  |  Page 126  |  Page 127  |  Page 128  |  Page 129  |  Page 130  |  Page 131  |  Page 132  |  Page 133  |  Page 134  |  Page 135  |  Page 136  |  Page 137  |  Page 138  |  Page 139  |  Page 140  |  Page 141  |  Page 142  |  Page 143  |  Page 144