This page contains a Flash digital edition of a book.
Page 4


www.us- tech.com


Tech-Op-ed September, 2016


SOUNDING OFF By Walter Salm


Editor Emeritus


So It’s Ugly, Big Deal U


gly as sin — that was my first impression of the Fairchild-Republic A-10 Thunderbolt II, also lovingly known as “Warthog” because it really is ug- ly and has a lot of metal “warts” on its skin. I first saw the Warthog in


the boneyard at Tucson’s Davis-Monthan AFB. In the boneyard. Turns out these few retired aircraft are kept there for spare parts, since Tucson is the home base for these aircraft when they’re not deployed, and they stopped man- ufacturing the A-10 in 1984. I am happy to report that the A-10 is still alive and well in all its ugliness, and in its latest assignment, is blasting away at ISIS po- sitions in Iraq. My wife and I would drive through the Tucson boneyard every time we went into town on our weekly shopping expedition, since Kolb Avenue runs right through the middle of the Air Force base and was the shortest route from I-10 to CostCo and Trader Joe’s. The Warthog is uniquely qualified for its new assignment in spite of re-


peated efforts by USAF brass to be rid of the plane. The Air Force chiefs nev- er quite accepted the A-10; it’s slow and ugly and lacks the glamour of the zip- py new ultra-fast and ultra-expensive F-35s that in spite of their glitz, can’t provide much in the way of close support for grunts on the ground — certain- ly not the way the A-10 can. Recently, an Air Force four-star appeared before Congress and tried to kill the Warthog’s annual operating budget of $300 mil- lion. This money, if freed up, might pay for as many as 3 new F-35s. Wow. First manufactured in 1976, the A-10 rolled off the assembly lines with


a delivered price tag of $18.8 million — a lot cheaper than the F-35’s current cost of $98 million or more. Some F-35 versions are expected to cost as much as $116 million, and we’re not even sure how well they will perform. The A-10’s principal armament is its 30 mm Gatling cannon, which fires


large depleted uranium armor-piercing rounds, at a rate of 3,900 rounds per minute. It makes a sound like a big zipper being unzipped. The Gatling gun itself is about the size of a Volkswagon Beetle, and the plane was designed and built around the gun, which protrudes from the nose. The plane also has 11 hard points that can mount bombs, racks of rockets and missiles. The A-10 gives the military a lot of bang for the buck, and I’m awfully


glad they still have a whole bunch of them in operation. The Warthog’s first combat appearance was in 1991 in the Gulf War. Its


fearsome firepower accounted for the destruction of over 900 tanks, 2,000 oth- er military vehicles, and 1,200 artillery pieces. It also saw service in the Balkans and Afghanistan. This is intentionally not a fast flying plane; its cruising speed is about


350 mph, and it is designed to “loaf” over battlefields, remaining available to be called in by ground troops to take out difficult enemy targets, a task at which it excels. The aircraft carries an exceptional amount of armor, which provides lots


of protection for Air Force pilots, and along with redundant control systems has contributed to bringing pilots back alive in badly shot-up planes. USAF pilots love the plane; USAF generals hate it. They believe the Air Force’s pri- mary mission is to provide high-flying speed and glitz and to carry nuclear bombs. Yet the A-10 is incredibly well-suited to fight the kinds of wars we are now involved in. Fortunately, Congress has provided repeated renewals for the A-10,


with upgrades for its electronics and engines, and the plane is now expected to be around at least until 2029. That’s the earliest that the USAF believes it can have a suitable replacement ready to go into service, probably at a very high cost per plane. The generals still labor under the delusion that the $100 million super-fast F-35 can provide good ground support. It can’t, but it’s doubtful that they’ll ever admit it. In the meantime, the ugly, wonderful Warthog continues to do a job that can be done by no other military aircraft. It’s incredibly effective at its job, and it brings the pilots back alive every time, while continuing to work at bargain prices. r


PUBLISHER’S NOTE


By Jacob Fattal Publisher


lower, sparking some concern that the economy is stalling. Does this present an opportunity for Japan? That nation’s government is showing a renewed in- terest in manufacturing, trying to find ways to fill the gaping holes that were left when large consumer electronics companies abandoned Japan during the last decade for fairer shores, including China. Now, with multi-billion dollar government support, the country is hoping


Lessons from the Far East L


to develop its first domestic aircraft in over 40 years. Mitsubishi, which made aircraft during World War II, has targeted the mid-size passenger jet market with its heavily subsidized offering, the Mitsubishi Regional Jet. The Japan- ese government is reported to be footing about a third of the $1.5 billion cost of its development. After suffering a ban on the building of aircraft after WWII, followed by


Mitsubishi’s failures in the 1950s and 1960s to develop commercial aircraft, the company is trying again — this time with the entire nation’s support. While some analysts are dismissing the company’s goal of 5,000 planes deliv- ered over the next 20 years as unrealistic, if the airplane is a success, we may witness the birth of a new industry for Japan. As U.S.Tech heads to Rosemont, Illinois, for SMTA International, we can


learn much from the tenacity of the East as it applies to our country’s own lost manufacturing. Chicagoland is fighting its own battle to modernize, with old fac- tories and production facilities being updated to create some of the world’s most advanced high-tech products. In its worldwide travels, U.S.Tech has a unique perspective on the state of global manufacturing. To keep up with our travels, our new editorial and trade show calendar appears on page 112 of this issue. While we can point to any number of reasons for China’s recent slow-


down, it’s important to take a lesson from Japan’s renewed determination. Reshoring is foremost in our minds and hearts these days, and it’s important to push for more manufacturing, research, and the development of incredible new technologies here at home. American knowhow is far from dead, but it requires constant nurturing. r


ast year, China experienced its lowest percentage of growth in 25 years, dipping just below 7 percent. Since that figure was announced earlier this year, the government has set its target growth rate for 2016 even


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116