search.noResults

search.searching

note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
published, and was probably never written at all. However, Wieland subsequently, despite the horrors of the French Revolution that he strongly rejected, discussed cosmopolitan topics in his writings.Why didWieland use a description of a non-existent or at least invisible Order as a framework for his ideas on cosmopolitanism? I suggest the following possible reasons. Within secret societies (such as freemasonry) during the 18th


century ideas on


human equality developed together with a principal need for universal solidarity, charity and welfare, dissemination of knowledge, and the introduction of sound principles of government. This general ideological framework comprised the often-cited “augmentation of felicity” or ‘pursuit of happiness” for mankind in the sense of the US constitution. Through a joint European sociability, a cosmopolitan community was created, yet open only for the initiated and practised only in privacy.Although many of the ideas and items of modern civic society were exercised in the framework of secret societies such as freemasonry (passports, membership records and payment of fees/taxes, democratic voting, etc., see Margaret C. Jacobs ground- breaking work on these topics), there was never a direct adoption of those principles in society as a whole. Wieland surely saw a need for that (he wanted the royal art to be extended to the field of governance) and thus he needed to attack the internal preoccupation of the Orders with themselves and their “private” matters. As a result, Wieland rejects the secrecy within the act of initiation: he states that cosmopolitan values should be accessible to all (aside from


the ignorant Abderites) and should be promoted in public. Another important aspect of the rejection of secrecy within initiatory societies is the habit of taking an oath, the content of which remains unknown totheoutsideworld,especiallygovernments. Secret societies and Orders were widely discussed in 18th


century European press.


The 1780s in particular containedmany features thatWieland could draw upon. Already the words secret and Order were constantly found in the press. One of the reasons was that a masonic system called the Strict Observance (SO) had spread throughout Europe between 1754 and 1782. The SO claimed that it had inherited the right to re-establish the defunct Order of the Knights Templar, and thus founded provinces and chapters in many European countries. Its Inner Circle of Knights counted 1,600 members, among them many prominent people from high nobility or royal families, well-known writers, academics and so on. The leader of the SO also claimed that he had received his instructions from a group of “secret superiors” – the names of whom he was unable to reveal. Within the framework of the SO some of the most Utopian and most irrational traits of enlightened culture can be found. Onthe one hand, the knights of the SO worked to realise certain groundbreaking innovations such as an all-European pension fund, financed by the contribution of its members and by investments in industrial production.


77


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116  |  Page 117  |  Page 118  |  Page 119  |  Page 120  |  Page 121  |  Page 122  |  Page 123  |  Page 124  |  Page 125  |  Page 126  |  Page 127  |  Page 128  |  Page 129  |  Page 130