search.noResults

search.searching

note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
and dialectical view of secrecy. To him secrecy is not just another cultural or political expression, but is deeply rooted in the history and the prehistory of mankind, as, in his own words, “einen Gegenstand des grauen Alterthums”. Moreover, in the letters against Nicolai he often expresses rather favorable


inclination to the idea of selecting a group of men, “die Vornehmsten, Brauchbarsten, Ersten”, and organizing them in a society: 9 Ich will es glauben, dass in einem so großen Orden, wo viele wackre Glieder waren, vielleicht auch aufgeklärte Glieder gewesen: es kann beinahe nicht anders seyn, als dass ihre Bekanntschaft mit den Saracenen, vielleicht auch in einigen Ländern Europens mit den Albigensern, Stedingern, und wie die Ketzer weiter genannt wurden, die Begriffe mancher Ritter geläutert und über den Pöbel der herrschenden Kirche erhoben habe. Verschiedene Lebensweise, Reisen, Kenntnis anderer Länder und Partheien, geben inbesonderheit tapfern Leuten eine Art Unpartheilichkeit und allgemeiner Uebersicht, die eingeschlossene Mönche und disputierende Gelehrte wohl nicht haben konnten 10. This is indeed a very interesting passage, especially the final reference to the ideals


of Unpartheilichkeit und allgemeiner Uebersicht. At the end of his fierce attack on Nicolai’s book Herder ends up formulating an almost utopian ideal – of a kind of men who through their experience with other peoples and other cultures has developed a generality of knowledge and an openness of mind that not only sets them apart from the mob – “den Pöbel der Kirche” – but even from the scholars and monks studying, collecting their knowledge behind closed doors. And this – we should add – is also a function of secrecy. According to the argument I am making here this is what really interests Herder in Freemasonry and in the secret societies: the opportunity to create, to build – in the


full German sense of bilden – groups, societies of men who are not “eingeschlossen” – locked up – like monks, in their religious, cultural and national contexts, but who are fundamentally open-minded, liberal and cosmopolitan. The function of secrecy then, is to free these people from the political and religious forces controlling them, from their duties and allegiances to the state and the church. Hence, this protective function, this “schützende Funktion”, to use Koselleck’s term, is to Herder not an end in itself, but a means of creating the space necessary to bring about a reorientation, from the small world of the monastry or the principality, to the bigger world of the nation, the continent, the globe. However, in his own time, not least in Nicolai’s book on the Templars, Herder can observe how the function of secrecy has become an end in itself, how function becomes content, how members of Masonic lodges become more interested in the rituals and the levels of initiations than in educating themselves and others in open- mindedness and cosmopolitanism. This could – in my opinion – partly explain Herder’s ambivalent attitude towards Freemasonry. Furthermore, in more or less all his relevant texts Herder faces the question if the strategies of secrecy are not outdated, “unzeitgemäß”, if we have not reached a level of Enlightenment when their “protective function” is in fact not needed anymore. Obviously, the strategies of secrecy are not in accordance with the fundamental ideals of Enlightenment. Hence, Herder is constantly


9 15, s. 100 10 s. 110


54


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116  |  Page 117  |  Page 118  |  Page 119  |  Page 120  |  Page 121  |  Page 122  |  Page 123  |  Page 124  |  Page 125  |  Page 126  |  Page 127  |  Page 128  |  Page 129  |  Page 130