search.noResults

search.searching

dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
42 HAIR CARE


storage optimisation. Thanks to its liquid form, the product is not only easy to handle, but is also able to decrease the need for heating while formulating hair conditioners or masks. While BTAC-based formulations need to be heated around 80°C, formulating with SF-EQ can be done at 65°C, hence contributing to energy savings. What is more, this sunflower oil- based esterquat is considered to be Derived Natural by ISO 16128 [Standard]. The Natural Origin Index for the product is 0.88. SF-EQ is a patent-pending technology due to its novel performance and composition.


A high-performance alternative, for demanding consumers While this esterquat was designed to meet as many sustainability criteria as possible, another crucial aspect to assess is the technical performance. A consumer may feel good about buying an SF-EQ-based conditioner, but if the effect of the product on the hair is not satisfactory, then SF-EQ would have little chance to make a sustainable impact on the long term. From a theoretical standpoint, as this


esterquat is derived from sunflower oil, its carbon chain distribution is supposed to be more optimal for hair applications than palm-based esterquats. That is thanks notably to the high amounts of the insaturated oleic acid (C18:1). This degree of unsaturation is believed to assist in coating and lubricating the hair for ease of combing. To verify this assumption and assess the


technical performance of SF-EQ, a variety of testing was performed. For the assessment of the detangling


BEFORE NO TREATMENT CONTROL (shampoo only) CETAC


BTAC SF-EQ


Figure 4: SEM Photography of comparative cationic-treated hair.


properties of this new esterquat, the Dia- Stron equipment was used. This instrument measures the force needed to pull a comb through a standardised tress of wet hair. The greater the force, the poorer the conditioning performance. Figure 2 shows the result of a wet


combability test. To simulate damaged hair, the tress tested was bleached Caucasian hair. The first bar corresponds to shampooed and rinsed hair, unconditioned. The second bar is the base conditioning formulation, without the cationic conditioning agent. Present in this base are fatty alcohols and cellulose thickening agents typically used in hair conditioners to provide viscosity and to stabilise the formulation. As expected for these two samples, combing forces are high, due to the absence of conditioning agents. When


AFTER TREATMENT BTAC


2% active conditioning agent is added to the base, the force needed to comb through hair is significantly reduced by all the cationic conditioning agents, showing easier detangling. However, CETAC and palm-based esterquats are not premium performers. Only the sunflower oil esterquat was able to equal the performance of the leading chemistry, BTAC. The same testing has been repeated


with dry combing evaluation and with Asian hair, and each produced similar results. Stepan also studied the deposition of


SF-EQ onto the hair fibre and assessed its substantive character. To do so, a modified Rubine test using the anionic Red 80 dye was performed. This anionic dye serves to reveal the presence of a cationic onto keratin, the main component of hair. Tresses


AFTER 2ND


STEPANQUAT Soleil


SHAMPOO


STEPANQUAT Soleil No build up effect


Figure 3:Modified Rubine Dye test: assessment of SF-EQ substantivity. PERSONAL CARE GLOBAL August 2020


AFTER TREATMENT


BEFORE TREATMENT


AFTER TREATMENT


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84