search.noResults

search.searching

dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
INSIGHT - CASHLESS GAMING Te three steps to Cashless


Step 1. Carded Cashless Customer uses physical player card account. Deposits and withdrawals limited to age and slot machines Step 2. Cardless Cashless Customer uses either physical player card or virtual player card with EZ Pay cashless wagering account via Cardless Connect. Deposits and withdrawals limited to cage and slot machine. Step 3. IGTPay Full service cashless wagering. The cashless wagering account can be directly funded (deposits and withdrawals) using a bank, credit/debit card, and/or eWallet via IGTPay.


towards at least phase 1-2, if not all the way to phase 3. There is such a broad consumer base of players that we’re not going to see immediate universal adoption, be that through a desire for anonymity, or reluctance to adopt new technology. There will, of course, be consumers that see the value of cashless, create a demand and choose between Casino A or Casino B, depending upon the provision of cashless.


In regards to the efficiency of cashless; I don’t think operators will enjoy the full benefits until the majority of players have migrated to cashless play, which will take time as those legacy forms of payment will remain viable options in the gaming environment.


Could you describe the current landscape; from the current position of the operators (1), the regulations in place and forthcoming (2) , any compliance issues (3) and the acceptance of players (4).


Firstly, everything has to be considered in the context of the pandemic. Covid-19 is a disruption point for this technology in the gaming industry. We saw progressive operators moving towards cashless gaming, but what we’re seeing now is a gigantic pull from the industry that didn’t exist pre-Covid- 19. I don’t think there’s going to be blanket adoption, but while many of the Las Vegas Strip properties are looking to move immediately to step three as it makes the most sense for their consumers, some of the regional players want to go step-by-step as


part of a process towards external funds.


Depending on the operator, their consumer base and their market, there are varying degrees of willingness along the path from step one to step three. The install base of IGT’s cashless solutions across the globe, shows Carded Cashless is commonplace in APAC countries. We have a lot of APAC customers already at stage one with loyalty cards connected to an account, which has been a solution in the market for many years. Culturally, we know that APAC customers are prepared to accept cashless step one.


In the US, to date, MotorCity adopted Carded Cashless technology several years ago. However, we haven’t seen the same degree of penetration as in APAC. Moving to Cardless Cashless, we see installations , California with tribal gaming operatorsthat are progressive and forward-leaning from a technology perspective, and both installed in 2019. The third step, IGTPay, which is external funds pay, has seen lottery customers and digital customers, such as Penn National, and most recently Svenska Spel in Sweden, which has 4,000-plus VLTs, make the move to VGM and mobile full cashless with external funds transfer.


In answer to the second point regarding regulators, we have had multiple conversations with the Nevada Gaming Control Board (NGCB), in which we see a similar level of excitement and enthusiasm towards cashless that’s comparable to the


operators. The Emergency Directive issued by the Governor of Nevada in response to the pandemic, specifically addressed retail stores (not casinos) and the encouragement of card payments to effectively go cashless. We are now seeing that while the original intent was solely for retailers, we are seeing the same push and enthusiasm from casino operators, with regulators wanting to be forward-looking and progressive too. I think that Nevada is seeking to be pioneering in this respect. We also work with the American Gaming Association (AGA), which has identified a number of potential states in the US that are looking to be the leaders in this space.


Looking specifically at Nevada, all three of the steps - 1. carded, 2. cardless and 3. external funds transfer - are legal, compliant and allowed within current regulations. There has been trailblazing in Nevada that has propelled the step change to a cashless as both wagering accounts and funds transfer exist in both the regulations and the law. What we’re now compelled to prove is the technology in field trials, but we’re no longer forced to advocate for new regulations, as the regulators have already provided the framework.


In terms of compliance, your third point, lottery markets are worthy of a distinction unto themselves, because within these markets the lottery is effectively the regulator. They rely on external testing bodies, but in terms of oversight and regulation, this comes from the lottery itself. And, as per tradition, Northern European lotteries continue to be forward- looking and several steps ahead of the industry.


NEWSWIRE / INTERACTIVE / MARKET DATA P49


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116  |  Page 117  |  Page 118  |  Page 119  |  Page 120  |  Page 121  |  Page 122  |  Page 123  |  Page 124  |  Page 125  |  Page 126  |  Page 127  |  Page 128  |  Page 129  |  Page 130  |  Page 131  |  Page 132  |  Page 133  |  Page 134  |  Page 135  |  Page 136  |  Page 137  |  Page 138  |  Page 139  |  Page 140  |  Page 141  |  Page 142  |  Page 143  |  Page 144  |  Page 145  |  Page 146  |  Page 147  |  Page 148  |  Page 149  |  Page 150  |  Page 151  |  Page 152  |  Page 153  |  Page 154  |  Page 155  |  Page 156  |  Page 157  |  Page 158  |  Page 159  |  Page 160  |  Page 161  |  Page 162  |  Page 163  |  Page 164  |  Page 165  |  Page 166  |  Page 167  |  Page 168  |  Page 169  |  Page 170  |  Page 171  |  Page 172  |  Page 173  |  Page 174  |  Page 175  |  Page 176