This page contains a Flash digital edition of a book.
GRADUATE POLICIES


• The student has failed an elective course and the Chair approves the substitution of an alternate elective (providing the program has defined electives). The old grade can be removed from the GPA by changing to CK, ZK or FK.


In any other case, the approval for changing a grade may be done with the approval of the Provost. Documentation of the change shall be sent to the Graduate Academic Advisor and placed in the student’s file for historical record. Questions regarding financial aid and veterans benefits should be directed to the Financial Aid office.


GRADING GUIDELINES


The assignment of a letter grade for a course is an indication of the student’s overall success in achieving the learning outcomes for the course. The course letter grade may be viewed as a summary statement of the student’s achievement in individual assessments (assignments and activities). These assessments are intended to identify for students their strengths as well as those areas in need of improvement. Students work is assessed according to the guidelines below.


Course-level Grading Guidelines: A ………………….95 – 100% of the total possible points.


A- …………………90 – 94% of the total possible points. B+ ………………... 87 – 89% of the total possible points. B …………………..84 – 86% of the total possible points. B- ………………….80 – 83% of the total possible points. C …………………..70 – 79% of the total possible points. F ………………….<70% of the total possible points.


ASSESSMENT (ASSIGNMENTS & ACTIVITIES) GRADING GUIDELINES


Grade: A Guidelines: Superior Graduate Performance (exemplary work that greatly exceeds requirements)


Typical Factors All main points are clearly and precisely stated and contain a high degree of mature, creative and fully developed expression of ideas; no noticeable or distracting grammatical, typographical or spelling errors; completed work highly exceeds stated requirements; demonstrates superior level and type of expression; displays strong evidence of highly organized thought process.


Business Example Communicates the highest level of mastery. Project worthy of highlighting in your professional portfolio. Professor would be honored to recommend you to do this type of work for a high-quality organization. Members of the executive staff who review the project are highly interested in your work and may want to create (if one does not exist) an advanced position in their area for you on the spot.


Grade: A-


Guidelines: Excellent Graduate Performance (greatly exceeds requirements)


Typical Factors All main points are clearly and precisely stated and contain evidence of innovation and creativity; minor grammatical or spelling errors; assignment demonstrates well above average and appropriate level and type of expression.


Business Example Communicates a high level of competence. Project worthy of inclusion in your professional portfolio. Professor would write a positive recommendation to others on your behalf to do this type of work for a high-quality organization. Members of the executive staff who review the project become interested and would consider placing you on a fast track for an advanced position in their functional areas.


Grade: B+


Guidelines: Above Expected Graduate Performance (somewhat exceeds requirements)


Typical Factors All main points were covered and well supported; relatively few grammatical, typographical or spelling errors; finished assignment demonstrated above average and appropriate level and type of expression.


Business Example Communicates above average competence. Could be included in a professional portfolio. Work clarifies action taken on behalf of an employer’s request. Your immediate superior, upon reviewing the project, believes that you can rationally support your decisions and choices. Your supervisor may be interested not only in your work, but might consider creating a new, or expanding the current, position for you to specifically perform this or similar type of work.


Grade: B Guidelines: Expected Graduate Performance (meets all requirements)


Typical Factors All main points covered; relatively few noticeable and distracting grammatical, spelling and typographical errors; assignment demonstrated average and appropriate level and type of expression.


Business Example Communicates an average level of competence. Work may or may not qualify for inclusion in a professional portfolio highlighting your skills and abilities. Work provides specifically what was asked for. Your capabilities, as demonstrated by this work, will ensure a measure of confidence in your ability to meet the performance needs of the organization.


Franklin University Bulletin • www.franklin.edu


125


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116  |  Page 117  |  Page 118  |  Page 119  |  Page 120  |  Page 121  |  Page 122  |  Page 123  |  Page 124  |  Page 125  |  Page 126  |  Page 127  |  Page 128  |  Page 129  |  Page 130  |  Page 131  |  Page 132  |  Page 133  |  Page 134  |  Page 135  |  Page 136  |  Page 137  |  Page 138  |  Page 139  |  Page 140  |  Page 141  |  Page 142  |  Page 143  |  Page 144  |  Page 145  |  Page 146  |  Page 147  |  Page 148  |  Page 149  |  Page 150  |  Page 151  |  Page 152  |  Page 153  |  Page 154  |  Page 155  |  Page 156  |  Page 157  |  Page 158  |  Page 159  |  Page 160  |  Page 161  |  Page 162  |  Page 163  |  Page 164  |  Page 165  |  Page 166  |  Page 167  |  Page 168  |  Page 169  |  Page 170  |  Page 171  |  Page 172  |  Page 173  |  Page 174  |  Page 175  |  Page 176  |  Page 177  |  Page 178  |  Page 179  |  Page 180  |  Page 181  |  Page 182  |  Page 183  |  Page 184  |  Page 185  |  Page 186  |  Page 187  |  Page 188  |  Page 189  |  Page 190  |  Page 191  |  Page 192  |  Page 193  |  Page 194  |  Page 195  |  Page 196  |  Page 197  |  Page 198  |  Page 199  |  Page 200  |  Page 201  |  Page 202  |  Page 203  |  Page 204  |  Page 205  |  Page 206  |  Page 207  |  Page 208  |  Page 209  |  Page 210