search.noResults

search.searching

dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
BUYER’S GUIDE


By CATHERINE CHETWYND


It’s not easy being green


How do buyers ensure TMCs and suppliers are running sustainability programmes?


T 1


OM STONE HAS RUN INDEPENDENT TRAVEL CONSULTANCY Sirius Management since 2003, after a career of global travel procurement roles at Smith Kline Beecham, Seagram’s and Universal Music. “For many companies, sustainability and corporate social responsibility


[CSR] come far down the priority list after disaster recovery and crisis management, particularly in these straitened economic times,” says Stone. “Some organisations take it seriously because of their shareholders or the sector they are in, but they tend to be in the minority. Otherwise, it tends to be a tick-box exercise. In my experience, enquiries into airline and hotel policies can be less deep than into TMCs, but I have yet to see a supplier selected on the basis of a sustainability programme; hotels are chosen on location and price, and airlines on available seats on a route and price.”


BUYERS CAN GET CARBON EMISSIONS reports from a TMC but they have to know what to do with


them and to check whether suppliers offset emissions. Regarding TMCs and airlines, I’ve faced this dilemma with a couple of organisations that want to reduce their carbon footprint and want to save money, but there is a conflict of interest when companies are flying people via interme- diate points. It is more cost effective to fly London to Singapore via Dubai than it is to fly direct, but most carbon emissions are generated on take-off and landing, so if you fly via Dubai, you are taking off and landing twice. The reality is that carbon emissions are less important than saving £1,000 on a long-haul trip. Any company that encourages travellers to go via inter- mediate points has to accept that compro- mises their green credentials.


2


THERE ARE WAYS AROUND THIS. One company I worked with takes sustainability serious-


ly to the point that its airline programme is not based on long-haul travel but


34 BBT May/June 2018


regional travel. It has established hubs in the Middle East, Southeast Asia, Europe and North America and flies on a region- al basis, so that top city pairs are within each region. For the same reason, it is also zealous about use of Skype. A lot of com- panies encourage that but few promote it not just as an alternative but as the first port of call. Certainly, it saves money but that is a beneficial knock-on effect after reducing its carbon footprint. With air- lines, rather than simply trying to cut the number of miles needed to comply, a buyer’s primary concern in the RFP should be which carrier is more advanced with biofuel research and who has more envi- ronmentally friendly jets.


3


WITH THE CLIENT’S TMC BID, the response to the CSR question was taken seriously, although I don’t think their


ultimate decision was predicated on it. Instead of the obligatory one question that ticks the box, there were several searching questions on sustainability, CSR and a number of other areas that required de- tailed answers. These included policy and commitment to CSR, and how this


cascades to the supply chain, how the TMC manages its own suppliers, what targets exist for CO2 emission reduction and how these are measured, method of offset and how the TMC provides assis- tance in CO2 measurement and reporting.


4


A BUYER CHECKING ON CSR POLICY and sustain- ability of suppliers should get answers relatively easily and


some of that information would be avail- able through the TMC. Any buyer who has a relationship or potential relation- ship with airline suppliers of any note should be able to get their position on sustainability easily – but how that trans- lates into something meaningful is a grey area. If I were a travel manager in an or- ganisation that was taking this seriously, there would be an internal (or perhaps external) department focusing on sustain- ability and CSR, and I would involve them in testing claims made by suppliers.


5


LOOK AT THE BIG HITTERS such as airline emissions and car rental. If your company is going to


select suppliers on how they rank in sustainability, pose searching questions that probe the supplier’s commitment to sustainability into an RFP. Test suppliers’ claims, possibly by taking up references that are specific to sustainability; this probably belongs in the remit of a sustain- ability expert. And ask for regular reports on how a supplier’s sustainability pro- gramme is performing so that you can monitor their performance. If I were a travel buyer in an organisation


that was really serious about sustainability, I would want the sustainability expert in the company to be involved in my selection process as a criterion examiner. Most travel people understand what sustainability is, but when you get into the finer details, an expert needs to be involved.


BUYINGBUSINESSTRAVEL.COM


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116  |  Page 117  |  Page 118  |  Page 119  |  Page 120  |  Page 121  |  Page 122  |  Page 123  |  Page 124  |  Page 125  |  Page 126  |  Page 127  |  Page 128  |  Page 129  |  Page 130  |  Page 131  |  Page 132  |  Page 133  |  Page 134  |  Page 135  |  Page 136  |  Page 137  |  Page 138  |  Page 139  |  Page 140  |  Page 141  |  Page 142  |  Page 143  |  Page 144  |  Page 145  |  Page 146  |  Page 147  |  Page 148  |  Page 149  |  Page 150  |  Page 151  |  Page 152