search.noResults

search.searching

saml.title
dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
76 SKIN CARE


5.0 4.5 4.0 3.5 3.0 2.5 2.0 1.5 1.0 0.5 0.0


4.5


1.5


D0


D28 2,5% AHE


Figure 12a: Preventive soothing efficacy of 2,5% AHE application for 28 days; decrease in global reactivity score of about 67% in 97% of subjects (p<0,001); (D0 – day before treatment onset, D28 2.5% AHE – day 28 of treatment with 2,5% Alpin Heilmoor Extract).


References 1 Gomes C, et al. Peloids and pelotherapy: Historical evolution, classification and glossary. Appl Clay Sci. 2013; 1;75–76:28–38.


2 Kumar V, et al. A keratin scaffold regulates epidermal barrier formation, mitochondrial lipid composition, and activity. J Cell Biol [Internet]. 2015; 7;211(5):1057–75.


3 Borg M, et al. The role of cytokines in skin aging. Climacteric. 2013;16(5):514–21.


4 Liguori I, et al. Oxidative stress, aging, and diseases. Clin Interv Aging [Internet]. 2018; 26;13:757–72.


5 Montuschi P, Barnes PJ, Roberts LJ 2nd. Isoprostanes: markers and mediators of oxidative stress. FASEB J Off Publ Fed Am Soc Exp Biol. 2004;18(15):1791–800.


6 Shim JH. Prostaglandin E2 Induces Skin Aging via E-Prostanoid 1 in Normal Human Dermal Fibroblasts. Int J Mol Sci [Internet]. 2019; 7;20(22):5555.


7 Peiris H, et al. RCAN1 regulates mitochondrial function and increases susceptibility to oxidative stress in mammalian cells. Oxid Med Cell Longev [Internet]. 2014;2014:520316.


8 Zhang S, Duan E. Fighting against Skin Aging: The Way from Bench to Bedside. Cell Transplant [Internet]. 2018;27(5):729–38.


9 Lohwasser C, Neureiter D, Weigle B, Kirchner T, Schuppan D. The receptor for advanced


Control ■ 2.5% AHE ■


90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0


83%


Figure 12b: Preventive Soothing Effect of 2.5% AHE; D0.


35.0 30.0 25.0 20.0 15.0 10.0 5.0 0.0


Figure 12c: Preventive Soothing Effect of 2.5% AHE; D28.


D0 ■ D28■ -33%


29.5 -28% -34% 20.4 17.1 14.7 11.3 7.4 4.0 Microcysts Global


inflammatory lesions


Papules 1.7 1.0 Pustules Global


inflammatory lesions


Figure 14a: Anti-acne efficacy of 1,5% AHE application for 28 days; statistically significant decrease in the number of microcysts, global inflammatory lesions, global non-inflammatory lesions, papules and total lesions (p<0.0001); (D0 – day before treatment onset, d28 – day 28 of treatment with 2.5%)


glycation end products is highly expressed in the skin and upregulated by advanced glycation end products and tumor necrosis factor-alpha. J Invest Dermatol. 2006;126(2):291–9.


10 Shen C-Y, Lu C-H, Wu C-H, Li K-J, Kuo Y-M, Hsieh S-C, Yu C-L. The Development of Maillard Reaction, and Advanced Glycation End Product (AGE)-Receptor for AGE (RAGE) Signaling Inhibitors as Novel Therapeutic Strategies for Patients with AGERelated Diseases [Internet]. 2020 Nov 27;25(23): 5591.


11 Li L, Hartley R, Reiss B, Sun Y, Pu J, Wu D, et al. E-cadherin plays an essential role in collective directional migration of large epithelial sheets. Cell Mol Life Sci; 2012;69(16):2779–89.


12 Shin J-W, Kwon S-H, Choi J-Y, Na J-I, Huh C-H, Choi H-R, et al. Molecular Mechanisms of Dermal Aging and Antiaging Approaches. Int J Mol Sci. 2019;20(9).


13 Dréno B. What is new in the pathophysiology of acne, an overview. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2017;31 Suppl 5:8–12.


Total lesions -46% -42% -44% 9.0 5.0 19.7


50%


48% 30%


30 sec


3 min


Figure 13: Immediate soothing effect induced by 2,5% AHE; statistically significant decrease in the mean of intensity of stinging score after 30sec (p<0,001) and 3min (p<0,001) in 55% and 70% of subjects, respectively.


PERSONAL CARE April 2021


Figure 14b: Anti-Acne efficacy of 1.5% AHE; D0.


Figure 14c: Anti-Acne efficacy of 1.5% AHE; D28. www.personalcaremagazine.com


% of stinging intensity in mean


Average global reactivity score


mean of lesions


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90