search.noResults

search.searching

dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
HAIR CARE 55


illustrated by SEM images of the single hair fiber treated with polymeric solutions (Fig 5). 2 wt. % active polymer aqueous solution was sprayed on a hair fiber which was knotted after drying to induce mechanical strain. Polyurethane-34 forms a smooth


continuous film that withstands mechanical strain without breaking or flaking.


High humidity resistance Consumers expect hair styling product efficacy to be expressed in long lasting style retention even under challenging conditions. Typically, the High Humidity Curl Retention (HHCR) method is used to characterize styling polymer performance. Figure 6 shows HHCR results of conventional polymers versus Polyurethane-34. The comparison can also be viewed as performance versus biodegradability. The test was performed with polymeric


(2 wt. % active) aqueous solutions on undamaged Caucasian hair tresses (5 tresses per polymer). Approximately 0.02 g of solution was applied per 1g of hair. Hair tresses were subject to harsh conditions: 90% relative humidity at 30°C for 6 hours. Curl retention curves show that Polyurethane-34 outperformed PVP K90 and VP/VA copolymers in humidity resistance. When biodegradability comes into focus, Polyurethane-34 takes preference over acrylate copolymer even if their humidity resistance profile closely matches one another. When acrylate copolymer was tested along with Polyurethane-34 by OECD 301 B and 302 methods respectively, acrylate copolymer


Acrylate Copolymer Polyurethane-34


Figure 5: SEM images of the hair fiber coated with the polymeric film.


100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0


0 50 100 150


n Polyurethane-34, 60% degradation in 28 days n Acrylate copolymer, no degradation in 28 days n PVP k-90, persistant according literature n VP/VA copolymer, no biodegradation data available


200 Time (min) Figure 6: High humidity curl retention vs biodegradation.


250


300


350


400


May 2020


PERSONAL CARE NORTH AMERICA


Curl Retention %


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96