This page contains a Flash digital edition of a book.
Chapter 1: Regional Priorities and Drivers of Change


will require priority action. For many countries, especially the SIDS, environment negotiations are conducted by environment ministries which may be poorly coordinated with the ministries in charge of foreign affairs, finance and development planning which in turn may not be receptive


to commitments made by environment


ministries at negotiating tables; there remain deficiencies in the legal authority and institutional capacity needed for implementation and enforcement. These often result from the lack of or outdated regulatory legislative frameworks, as well as legislative uncertainties (UNEP 2012).


There remains the need for information at all levels for sound policy making. This was recognised in Agenda 21 chapter 40 and has been reiterated in subsequent international agreements on sustainable development. It is now especially the case with the adoption of the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development which calls for a ‘data revolution’ going forward. It has been acknowledged that considerable data already exist, in public and private sectors, in universities, think-tanks and community groups. The perpetual challenge remains in developing improved mechanisms for coordination among environmental, demographic, social and developmental data and information activities. It also remains a challenge that within the environment sector itself information is often scattered and disaggregated. This impacts monitoring, data collection, and assessment, which affect accountability, and result in insufficient review mechanisms that could create incentives for performance and early action.


Mechanisms for effective participation by all the relevant stakeholders in policy development and decision making, especially by the marginalised, socially excluded and disadvantaged groups, are still more an exception than the rule. If this is rectified it could strengthen environmental management.


Environmental governance is also negatively affected by corruption, and the cost of corruption or mismanagement of public resources can be very high. Transparency International estimates that damage from corruption normally ranges


from 10 to 25 per cent of the contract value worldwide. The impact of corruption can be significant considering that public procurement transactions represent up to 20 per cent of GDP in LAC (OECD/IDB 2014).


1.3 Drivers of Environmental Change


The overarching economic trends discussed below demonstrate the dependency that LAC countries’ economies have on natural resources. On the other hand, the global financial crisis has been a critical driving factor in the region in that reduced financial flows have the potential to impact how the region responds to environmental degradation as well as reducing the total amount of financial resources available to environmental programming.


1.3.1 Economic trends


The export industries in LAC are based mainly on the use of the region´s natural resources (UNCOMTRADE 2015). Exports of goods and services have changed their relative importance over recent decades in the region: for example two decades ago in the Caribbean such exports accounted for 60 per cent; in 2013 they were around 40 per cent. Such exports have increased slightly in Mesoamerica and South America, currently around 40 per cent and 30 per cent respectively, compared to 37 per cent and 24 per cent in 1990 (Figure 1.3.1).


In the Caribbean, tourism, which is dependent on natural resources and, as described in Chapter 2, can have a direct impact on them, is a key source of foreign exchange earnings, together with financial services. In 2013, international tourism receipts were 45 per cent of total exports from the region, more than twice the amount earned by Mesoamerica and 9 times greater than South America (WTO 2015). In some countries, the dependency ratio is even greater. For example, the earnings from tourism were more than 80 per cent of total services exports in the Bahamas and Saint Lucia, and more than 70 per cent in Aruba, the Dominican Republic, Grenada and Jamaica (IDB 2016).


19


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116  |  Page 117  |  Page 118  |  Page 119  |  Page 120  |  Page 121  |  Page 122  |  Page 123  |  Page 124  |  Page 125  |  Page 126  |  Page 127  |  Page 128  |  Page 129  |  Page 130  |  Page 131  |  Page 132  |  Page 133  |  Page 134  |  Page 135  |  Page 136  |  Page 137  |  Page 138  |  Page 139  |  Page 140  |  Page 141  |  Page 142  |  Page 143  |  Page 144  |  Page 145  |  Page 146  |  Page 147  |  Page 148  |  Page 149  |  Page 150  |  Page 151  |  Page 152  |  Page 153  |  Page 154  |  Page 155  |  Page 156  |  Page 157  |  Page 158  |  Page 159  |  Page 160  |  Page 161  |  Page 162  |  Page 163  |  Page 164  |  Page 165  |  Page 166  |  Page 167  |  Page 168  |  Page 169  |  Page 170  |  Page 171  |  Page 172  |  Page 173  |  Page 174  |  Page 175  |  Page 176  |  Page 177  |  Page 178  |  Page 179  |  Page 180  |  Page 181  |  Page 182  |  Page 183  |  Page 184  |  Page 185  |  Page 186  |  Page 187  |  Page 188  |  Page 189  |  Page 190  |  Page 191  |  Page 192  |  Page 193  |  Page 194  |  Page 195  |  Page 196  |  Page 197  |  Page 198  |  Page 199  |  Page 200  |  Page 201  |  Page 202  |  Page 203  |  Page 204  |  Page 205  |  Page 206  |  Page 207  |  Page 208  |  Page 209  |  Page 210  |  Page 211  |  Page 212  |  Page 213  |  Page 214  |  Page 215  |  Page 216  |  Page 217  |  Page 218  |  Page 219  |  Page 220  |  Page 221  |  Page 222  |  Page 223  |  Page 224  |  Page 225  |  Page 226  |  Page 227  |  Page 228  |  Page 229  |  Page 230  |  Page 231  |  Page 232  |  Page 233  |  Page 234  |  Page 235  |  Page 236  |  Page 237  |  Page 238  |  Page 239  |  Page 240  |  Page 241  |  Page 242  |  Page 243  |  Page 244  |  Page 245  |  Page 246  |  Page 247  |  Page 248  |  Page 249  |  Page 250  |  Page 251  |  Page 252  |  Page 253  |  Page 254  |  Page 255  |  Page 256  |  Page 257  |  Page 258  |  Page 259  |  Page 260  |  Page 261  |  Page 262  |  Page 263  |  Page 264