This page contains a Flash digital edition of a book.
Supplementary Information


Matanza - Riachuelo basin – approximately 10 per cent of the country’s total population and over a quarter of the Greater Buenos Aires population – 1.2 million live below the poverty line and 500 000 live in villas, the Argentine term for slums. This has resulted in pollution due to lack of modern sanitation facilities (McKinney 2012).


PROGRESS MADE: In 2009, a comprehensive sanitation plan (PISA) was developed to respond to the sanitation issue. It was an integrated plan which considers:


• An institutional mechanism, a governance structure, developed in the form of the River Basin Authority to enhance coordination;





Integrated management where it promotes recovery and preservation of the quality of surface water and groundwater including a design for the watershed;


• Social and economic considerations within the environmental context – where spatial impact action towards balanced


growth, integrated, sustainable management was considered, including wastes disposal;


• Legal governance through which laws were developed to enforce compliance;


• Community engagement which mainstreams public participation in decision making


IMPACT: Progress is being made and pollution is being dealt with in a more comprehensive manner, with greater engagement and more effective management of both the water and sanitation in the basin.


MAJOR PRE-REQUISITE FOR SUCCESS: Strong partnership, an integrated approach and sound legal governance.


36. Increasing Food Security in Costa Rica’s Indigenous Populations


THE PROBLEM: According to the 2000 Costa Rica census, indigenous peoples make up 1.7 per cent (64000) of the population (INEC 2015). There are eight recognized indigenous groups: Huetar, Chorotega, Teribe, Brunka,


Guaymí, Bribri, Cabecar, and Maleku. They live in 24 reserves set into law in 1977. The government established these territories, where indigenous people already


inhabited


the land which is rich in forests, rivers, and animals, with potential for agriculture, hunting, fishing, and gathering plants for various uses, as well as clean water in rivers and streams (Chacón Castro 2002). Although tourism and export agriculture production are the top contributors to GDP in Costa Rica (CIA 2015), the main livelihood of the indigenous is semi-subsistence


coupled with some income-generating activities and food purchases).


Agricultural historically


agriculture (subsistence production interventions have


focused almost exclusively on traditional Latin American crops and practices (coffee, banana, sugar, rice, beans, and corn). The typical high-yielding varieties of these crops require more intensive production than native crops and do not necessarily yield well in the regions where indigenous people live. Not only are the rainfall, soil types, and overall climate in indigenous reservations quite different from the lowlands where the main cash crops are usually grown, but high-yielding varieties usually require intensive inputs that are not accessible to indigenous people. Points of sale of improved seed, fertilizers, and pesticides are often far away, and purchasing those items is beyond the means of the poorest farmers. Furthermore, there are legal barriers to credit in the reservations, as a centre for Indian rights explains: “Indigenous peoples in Costa Rica cannot obtain agricultural credit because the lands belong to the community and there is no legal formula for providing guarantees on communal properties” (Schulting 2007).


ACTION TAKEN: The Ministry of Agriculture agency in Limón and Buenos Aires, a neighbouring canton in southern Costa Rica with a high indigenous population, has outlined strategies to improve food security for the indigenous people. The plan cites an absence of agricultural projects as a cause of poverty, migration, and food insecurity. The agency proposes projects that include goat and cow production, vegetable gardens for home use, irrigation systems for dry seasons, and focusing on interventions for home production. The home production suggested, however, proposes adaptation of indigenous land so that mainstream crops can


211


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116  |  Page 117  |  Page 118  |  Page 119  |  Page 120  |  Page 121  |  Page 122  |  Page 123  |  Page 124  |  Page 125  |  Page 126  |  Page 127  |  Page 128  |  Page 129  |  Page 130  |  Page 131  |  Page 132  |  Page 133  |  Page 134  |  Page 135  |  Page 136  |  Page 137  |  Page 138  |  Page 139  |  Page 140  |  Page 141  |  Page 142  |  Page 143  |  Page 144  |  Page 145  |  Page 146  |  Page 147  |  Page 148  |  Page 149  |  Page 150  |  Page 151  |  Page 152  |  Page 153  |  Page 154  |  Page 155  |  Page 156  |  Page 157  |  Page 158  |  Page 159  |  Page 160  |  Page 161  |  Page 162  |  Page 163  |  Page 164  |  Page 165  |  Page 166  |  Page 167  |  Page 168  |  Page 169  |  Page 170  |  Page 171  |  Page 172  |  Page 173  |  Page 174  |  Page 175  |  Page 176  |  Page 177  |  Page 178  |  Page 179  |  Page 180  |  Page 181  |  Page 182  |  Page 183  |  Page 184  |  Page 185  |  Page 186  |  Page 187  |  Page 188  |  Page 189  |  Page 190  |  Page 191  |  Page 192  |  Page 193  |  Page 194  |  Page 195  |  Page 196  |  Page 197  |  Page 198  |  Page 199  |  Page 200  |  Page 201  |  Page 202  |  Page 203  |  Page 204  |  Page 205  |  Page 206  |  Page 207  |  Page 208  |  Page 209  |  Page 210  |  Page 211  |  Page 212  |  Page 213  |  Page 214  |  Page 215  |  Page 216  |  Page 217  |  Page 218  |  Page 219  |  Page 220  |  Page 221  |  Page 222  |  Page 223  |  Page 224  |  Page 225  |  Page 226  |  Page 227  |  Page 228  |  Page 229  |  Page 230  |  Page 231  |  Page 232  |  Page 233  |  Page 234  |  Page 235  |  Page 236  |  Page 237  |  Page 238  |  Page 239  |  Page 240  |  Page 241  |  Page 242  |  Page 243  |  Page 244  |  Page 245  |  Page 246  |  Page 247  |  Page 248  |  Page 249  |  Page 250  |  Page 251  |  Page 252  |  Page 253  |  Page 254  |  Page 255  |  Page 256  |  Page 257  |  Page 258  |  Page 259  |  Page 260  |  Page 261  |  Page 262  |  Page 263  |  Page 264