This page contains a Flash digital edition of a book.
Chapter 2: State and Trends


ecosystems in LAC provides critical services to support economic development and ensure a good quality of life. Approximately one quarter of the tropical forests in the world are found in LAC, and they contribute significantly to the regulation of global climate by providing services such as carbon sequestration and climate regulation. The region also provides large areas of arable land that support agriculture to meet both regional and global food demands. The ecosystems of the region provide opportunities for other important economic and social activities such as tourism and fisheries; and watersheds continue to play an important role in providing water and energy (derived from hydroelectric means). Biodiversity is of critical importance to the many local and indigenous communities found throughout LAC, providing a source of livelihoods and in many cases, shaping their cultures and identity.


There is a need for the region to identify its most urgent data requirements and to make the most effective use of regional and international collaboration opportunities such as those offered by the Intergovernmental Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services (IPBES). Fostering greater public- private partnerships can also serve as a useful approach to support research agendas.


Mainstreaming biodiversity and ecosystem services into sectoral and cross-sectoral strategies, plans and programmes must become a top priority for the region. The recently adopted SDGs offer an opportunity to reconsider approaches and strategies; and these efforts can be supported by the wise application of important policy tools such as valuation, natural capital accounting and strategic environmental assessments.


2.5.2 Pressures Land use change


Land-use change, including degradation and fragmentation of natural habitats, remains the most important threat to biodiversity in the region (See Section 2.4). The conversion of


natural habitats to agriculture and pastureland is considered the most important land use threat to biodiversity in LAC; and the areas facing highest threat include the Atlantic coastal forests and savannah ecosystems (Magrin et al. 2014). Expansions of certain crops such as sugar cane, soybean and coffee plantations, as well as the rearing of livestock, are some of the agricultural activities that are of greatest concern. It has been reported that the rate of loss of natural ecosystems on account of agriculture has slowed in the past decade, but the total area being converted every year in LAC remains high, and is expected to continue this way given the current patterns of land use (Aguiar et al. 1996).


Particular concern for biodiversity also arises because of the patterns of urbanization seen in the region. In 2015, about 80 per cent of LAC’s population lived in urban areas, which is the highest apportionment seen in the world (UNECLAC 2015b). The majority of LAC´s urban agglomerations with more than 1 million people are in South America (43), followed by Mesoamerica (19) and the Caribbean (4) (UNDESA 2014); and many of these are sprawling over biodiversity hotspots.


Megacities in the Atlantic Forest eco-region in Brazil (for example, Sao Paulo and Rio de Janeiro), those in coastal Mesoamerica e.g. San Jose and Mexico City (CBD 2012), and urban areas in the Mediterranean-like ecosystems in Chile are growing within areas considered important for biodiversity (Miloslavich et al. 2010). To illustrate this point, light pollution in LAC (Figure 2.5.1) could serve as a useful indirect indicator of the pressure that urbanization exerts on natural environments within biodiversity hotspots.


In addition to the infringement on biodiversity hotspots, the growth of human settlements, tourism services and associated infrastructure in the region also continues to drive the transformation of coastal and marine ecosystems. Population growth in coastal areas has been rapid in LAC; between 1945 and 2014, the population in coastal cities with more than 100 000 inhabitants increased by 778 per cent (de Andres and Barragan 2015) (Table 2.5.1). In 2014, 420 cities with more than 100 000 inhabitants were settled within 100 kilometres of the coastline, some of them in marine and


103


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116  |  Page 117  |  Page 118  |  Page 119  |  Page 120  |  Page 121  |  Page 122  |  Page 123  |  Page 124  |  Page 125  |  Page 126  |  Page 127  |  Page 128  |  Page 129  |  Page 130  |  Page 131  |  Page 132  |  Page 133  |  Page 134  |  Page 135  |  Page 136  |  Page 137  |  Page 138  |  Page 139  |  Page 140  |  Page 141  |  Page 142  |  Page 143  |  Page 144  |  Page 145  |  Page 146  |  Page 147  |  Page 148  |  Page 149  |  Page 150  |  Page 151  |  Page 152  |  Page 153  |  Page 154  |  Page 155  |  Page 156  |  Page 157  |  Page 158  |  Page 159  |  Page 160  |  Page 161  |  Page 162  |  Page 163  |  Page 164  |  Page 165  |  Page 166  |  Page 167  |  Page 168  |  Page 169  |  Page 170  |  Page 171  |  Page 172  |  Page 173  |  Page 174  |  Page 175  |  Page 176  |  Page 177  |  Page 178  |  Page 179  |  Page 180  |  Page 181  |  Page 182  |  Page 183  |  Page 184  |  Page 185  |  Page 186  |  Page 187  |  Page 188  |  Page 189  |  Page 190  |  Page 191  |  Page 192  |  Page 193  |  Page 194  |  Page 195  |  Page 196  |  Page 197  |  Page 198  |  Page 199  |  Page 200  |  Page 201  |  Page 202  |  Page 203  |  Page 204  |  Page 205  |  Page 206  |  Page 207  |  Page 208  |  Page 209  |  Page 210  |  Page 211  |  Page 212  |  Page 213  |  Page 214  |  Page 215  |  Page 216  |  Page 217  |  Page 218  |  Page 219  |  Page 220  |  Page 221  |  Page 222  |  Page 223  |  Page 224  |  Page 225  |  Page 226  |  Page 227  |  Page 228  |  Page 229  |  Page 230  |  Page 231  |  Page 232  |  Page 233  |  Page 234  |  Page 235  |  Page 236  |  Page 237  |  Page 238  |  Page 239  |  Page 240  |  Page 241  |  Page 242  |  Page 243  |  Page 244  |  Page 245  |  Page 246  |  Page 247  |  Page 248  |  Page 249  |  Page 250  |  Page 251  |  Page 252  |  Page 253  |  Page 254  |  Page 255  |  Page 256  |  Page 257  |  Page 258  |  Page 259  |  Page 260  |  Page 261  |  Page 262  |  Page 263  |  Page 264