research review Powerful QCLs stretch to shorter wavelengths
Strain-balanced QCLs deliver continuous-wave output powers in excess of 500 mW at wavelengths as short as 3.4 µm
ENGINEERS AT Northwestern University, Illinois, have extended the spectral coverage of powerful quantum cascade lasers (QCLs) to shorter wavelengths.
Prior to their efforts, the shortest wavelength continuous-wave QCL, which was reported by Corning in late 2011, delivered a room- temperature output of 40 mW at 3.55 µm. This bar has now been raised with a pair of highly strain-balanced, InP-based AlInAs/GaInAs QCLs that emit 504 mW at 3.39 µm and 576 mW at 3.56 µm when driven in continuous-wave (CW) mode at room-temperature.
These powerful emitters can be used for remote sensing and jamming. In the former application, QCLs can unveil the presence of many hydrocarbons, which have strong absorption in the 3.3 µm to 3.6 µm range due to stretching modes of the carbon- hydrogen bonds. These organic materials include nerve agents such as cyclosarin, soman and tabun gas, and some explosives.
“For jamming applications, the 3.0 – 3.5 µm range is used by missile seekers to look for hot metal objects,” explains Manijeh Razeghi, head of the group at Northwestern University. “A laser in this wavelength range can be used to ‘dazzle’ the missile seeker so that it cannot acquire a target.”
Another class of laser that emits around 3 µm is the interband cascade laser. However, the performance of this class of device tends to vary far more with changes in temperature than a QCL. Historically, shorter wavelength QCLs have lagged behind their longer wavelength cousins in temperature insensitivity, but lasers from Northwestern have significantly closed this gap.
“We believe our success is partly due to the use of better electron confinement and a three-well active region,” reveals Razeghi.
The QCL community has made pulsed- mode QCLs operating at room-temperature from three different types of material system: InAs/AlSb/InAs, GaInAs/AlAs(Sb)/InP and GaInAs/AlInAs/InP. Razeghi and her co- workers use latter of these because its yields the best material quality, and it is best suited to commercial device manufacture. “A large infrastructure exists that is dedicated to the
44
www.compoundsemiconductor.net July 2012 Manijeh Razeghi’s group produces powerful QCLs on InP
growth of antimony-free InP-based compounds,” says Razeghi, who adds that antimony-containing systems would require significant ‘retooling’ and process development. The QCLs that she and her co- workers fabricate span an emission range from 3 µm to the terahertz range.
When GaInAs/AlInAs structures are lattice- matched to InP, the quantum-well depth is just 505-520 meV, which in insufficient for electron confinement for making QCLs operate below 6 µm. It is possible to increase the depth of the well a great deal by switching from GaInAs to InAs and replacing AlInAs with AlAs. However, this alternative material system is not lattice-matched to InP, preventing the growth of high-quality films that are a pre-requisite for making devices.
“To grow a device with a deep quantum well, good interfaces and without dislocations, the compressive strain of the InAs-rich material must be balanced – on the scale of one cascade stage – with the tensile strain of the AlAs-rich layer,” explains Razeghi. Those strain-balanced layers have a depth of about 1 eV. “This allows us to reach much shorter emission wavelengths with good electron confinement.”
Using this approach led to the construction of a 3.39 µm, double-channel ridge- waveguide QCL with an 8.6 µm width and 5 mm laser cavity. Driven with 500 ns pulses at a 100 kHz repetition rate, this laser
produces 1.1 W at room temperature. Switch to CW operation and output falls to 504 mW, 403 mW and 88 mW at 15 °C, 25 °C and 55 °C, respectively. The QCL’s 3.56 µm cousin has a 10.5 µm-wide ridge, and produces 1.66 W when driven in pulsed mode. In CW operation, output falls to 576 mW, 437 mW and 45 mW at 15 °C, 25 °C and 55 °C, respectively.
QCL performance can be improved with a buried heterostructure geometry that trims ridge widths and optical losses, while increasing thermal conductance. Performance then improves on several fronts: Threshold current falls; slope efficiency rises, resulting in higher output power; and internal temperature increases are smaller at all drive currents. The two major benefits that result from all these gains are an increase in the power saturation current density and a threshold current that is low, even at high temperatures. “This leads naturally to a higher operation temperature for CW operation,” remarks Razeghi.
Along with her co-workers, she is trying to improve material homogeneity, which will lead to better QCL performance. “We are systematically trying to identify the source of inhomogeneity. This includes investigations of reactor hardware limitations, growth conditions and interface effects.”
N. Bandyopadhyay et al. Appl. Phys. Lett. 100 212104 (2012)
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36 |
Page 37 |
Page 38 |
Page 39 |
Page 40 |
Page 41 |
Page 42 |
Page 43 |
Page 44 |
Page 45 |
Page 46 |
Page 47 |
Page 48 |
Page 49 |
Page 50 |
Page 51 |
Page 52 |
Page 53 |
Page 54 |
Page 55 |
Page 56 |
Page 57 |
Page 58 |
Page 59 |
Page 60 |
Page 61 |
Page 62 |
Page 63 |
Page 64 |
Page 65 |
Page 66 |
Page 67 |
Page 68 |
Page 69 |
Page 70 |
Page 71 |
Page 72 |
Page 73 |
Page 74 |
Page 75 |
Page 76 |
Page 77 |
Page 78 |
Page 79 |
Page 80 |
Page 81 |
Page 82 |
Page 83 |
Page 84 |
Page 85 |
Page 86 |
Page 87 |
Page 88 |
Page 89 |
Page 90 |
Page 91 |
Page 92 |
Page 93 |
Page 94 |
Page 95 |
Page 96 |
Page 97 |
Page 98 |
Page 99 |
Page 100 |
Page 101 |
Page 102 |
Page 103 |
Page 104 |
Page 105 |
Page 106 |
Page 107 |
Page 108 |
Page 109 |
Page 110 |
Page 111 |
Page 112 |
Page 113 |
Page 114 |
Page 115 |
Page 116 |
Page 117 |
Page 118 |
Page 119 |
Page 120 |
Page 121 |
Page 122 |
Page 123 |
Page 124 |
Page 125 |
Page 126 |
Page 127 |
Page 128 |
Page 129 |
Page 130 |
Page 131 |
Page 132 |
Page 133 |
Page 134 |
Page 135 |
Page 136 |
Page 137 |
Page 138 |
Page 139 |
Page 140 |
Page 141 |
Page 142 |
Page 143 |
Page 144 |
Page 145 |
Page 146 |
Page 147 |
Page 148 |
Page 149 |
Page 150 |
Page 151 |
Page 152 |
Page 153 |
Page 154 |
Page 155 |
Page 156 |
Page 157 |
Page 158 |
Page 159 |
Page 160 |
Page 161 |
Page 162 |
Page 163 |
Page 164 |
Page 165 |
Page 166 |
Page 167 |
Page 168 |
Page 169 |
Page 170 |
Page 171 |
Page 172 |
Page 173 |
Page 174 |
Page 175 |
Page 176 |
Page 177 |
Page 178 |
Page 179 |
Page 180 |
Page 181 |
Page 182 |
Page 183 |
Page 184 |
Page 185 |
Page 186