Investment in water and sanitation (SDG 6.a.1) Change in a positive direction
Amount of water- and sanitation-related official development assistance that is part of a government-coordinated spending plan.
Annual water sector ODA disbursement (thousands of constant 2016 US$), and water sector ODA as a percentage of total ODA
10000 9000 8000 7000 6000 5000 4000 3000 2000 1000
Years Water sector ODA disbursments
Water sector ODA as percentage of total ODA
Source: OECD 2016 Tier I; Custodian agency: World Health Organization (WHO), United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP) and Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)
Hundreds of billions of dollars still need to be raised to fund the implementation of SDG 6, which is expected to generate socioeconomic and health benefits that greatly exceed the cost of doing so. This calls for increased mobilisation of domestic funds and a significant scaling-up of external support to cover interim gaps where national capacity and resources are under development. Investments in the water sector need to be supported by sustainable business models and alternative financial mechanisms such as blended finance, loans, and revolving funds. Total water sector overseas development assistance (ODA) data show that disbursements increased from US$7.4 billion to US$9.0 billion between 2011 and 2016. Funding has increased across the sector since 2005, with aid for agricultural water resources nearly tripling. There is some evidence that ODA commitments to water and sanitation have declined since 2012, particularly in Sub-Saharan Africa, indicating uncertainty in future investments. Basic drinking water and sanitation systems accounted for nearly a quarter (22 percent) of total ODA disbursements in Sub-Saharan Africa. ODA for large drinking water and sanitation systems remained steady as a proportion of total ODA disbursements from 2011 to 2016, at approximately 40 percent.
56
5 6
4
0 1 2 3
Local water management (SDG 6.b.1) Too little data
Proportion of local administrative units with established and operational policies and procedures for participation of local communities in water and sanitation management.
Percentages of countries with low, moderate, high and no levels of participation by SDG region (rural drinking water supply)
Central Asia and Southern Asia Oceania*
Sub-Saharan Africa
Northern Africa and Western Asia Latin America and the Caribbean
Eastern Asia and South-eastern Asia Europe and Northern America
0 High 20 40 Moderate 60
Sewers - unsafe Low
80 100 None
Source: WHO 2018 Tier I; Custodian agency: World Health Organization (WHO), United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP) and Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)
Community participation is a key component of increasing sustainable WASH service provision, particularly in rural areas and for promoting IRWM. Achieving this can contribute towards increased partic¬ipation of women in political, economic and public life. It can also contribute towards ensuring conservation, restoration, and sustainable use of freshwater ecosystems and their services and ensuring responsive, inclusive, participatory, and representative decision-making at all levels. Over 75 percent of countries report having clearly defined policies and procedures in place for the participation of service users and communities in planning programmes for drinking water supply (urban: 79 percent, rural: 85 percent) and sanitation (urban: 79 percent, rural: 81 percent). Levels of participation remain comparatively low despite most countries reporting having clearly defined procedures for local participation. Less than 25 percent of countries report a high level of participation in any subsector. Levels of participation tend to be higher for drinking water supply (22 percent) and sanitation (21 percent) in rural areas compared to urban areas (13 percent and 9 percent, respectively). Rural drinking water supply tends to have the highest proportion of countries with defined procedures for participation, among the four subsectors, and urban sanitation has the lowest.
Measuring Progress Report 2019
Percentage
Constant 2015 USD (thousand)
2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36 |
Page 37 |
Page 38 |
Page 39 |
Page 40 |
Page 41 |
Page 42 |
Page 43 |
Page 44 |
Page 45 |
Page 46 |
Page 47 |
Page 48 |
Page 49 |
Page 50 |
Page 51 |
Page 52 |
Page 53 |
Page 54 |
Page 55 |
Page 56 |
Page 57 |
Page 58 |
Page 59 |
Page 60 |
Page 61 |
Page 62 |
Page 63 |
Page 64 |
Page 65 |
Page 66 |
Page 67 |
Page 68 |
Page 69 |
Page 70 |
Page 71 |
Page 72 |
Page 73 |
Page 74 |
Page 75 |
Page 76 |
Page 77 |
Page 78 |
Page 79 |
Page 80 |
Page 81 |
Page 82 |
Page 83 |
Page 84 |
Page 85 |
Page 86 |
Page 87 |
Page 88 |
Page 89 |
Page 90 |
Page 91 |
Page 92 |
Page 93 |
Page 94 |
Page 95 |
Page 96 |
Page 97 |
Page 98 |
Page 99 |
Page 100 |
Page 101 |
Page 102 |
Page 103 |
Page 104 |
Page 105 |
Page 106 |
Page 107 |
Page 108 |
Page 109 |
Page 110 |
Page 111 |
Page 112 |
Page 113 |
Page 114 |
Page 115 |
Page 116 |
Page 117 |
Page 118 |
Page 119 |
Page 120 |
Page 121 |
Page 122 |
Page 123 |
Page 124 |
Page 125 |
Page 126 |
Page 127 |
Page 128 |
Page 129 |
Page 130 |
Page 131 |
Page 132 |
Page 133 |
Page 134 |
Page 135 |
Page 136