search.noResults

search.searching

dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
Water stress (SDG 6.4.2) Too little data


Level of water stress: freshwater withdrawal as a proportion of available freshwater resources. Levels of water stress by country (%) (2000–2015)


Water resource management (SDG 6.5.1) Too little data


Degree of integrated water resources management implementation (0-100). Country implementation of integrated water resources management


Source: FAO and International Water Management Institute (IWMI) 2015 Tier I; Custodian agency: Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO)


The world’s average water stress level stands at almost 13 percent with more than 2 billion people living in countries experiencing high levels of water stress. There are significant differences in water stress among countries and world regions that are hidden in global or regional aggregated assessments. Sub- Saharan Africa has a low level of water stress (3 percent), a figure that is not representative of the higher water stress levels found in the southern parts. For instance, South Africa has an average water stress level of 43 percent. Similarly, water stress values at the national level can conceal differences between wet and dry areas within a country. Estimates for the level of water stress are available for 171 countries and for all SDG regions. 32 countries experience water stress between 25 and 70 percent and 22 countries are above 70 percent. 11 countries are above 100 percent including Libya, Saudi Arabia, United Arab Emirates, Jordan, and Kuwait, where the demand for freshwater is largely being met by desalination. An analysis of trends in water stress for the past 20 years (1996–2016) shows that water stress levels have increased in most countries in the world. The likely causes are increased economic activities, growing populations, and improved ways to measure water usage, along with the effects of climatic changes.


54


Source: UN Water and UNEP 2018 Tier I; Custodian agency: United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP)


Eighty per cent of countries have laid the foundations for IWRM, but implementation needs to be accelerated to realise the 2030 Agenda. Integrated approaches help to coordinate sustainable development and water management for the full spectrum of users: residents in urban and rural areas, agriculture, industries, energy, and natural ecosystems. So far, 172 countries have reported on the global baseline for indicator 6.5.1, covering 30 aspects of water management, including policies and plans, institutions and stakeholder engagement, management instruments, and financing. The overall scores are categorised into six categories: 20 per cent of countries have started developing elements of IWRM (“very low” and “low” implementation), 40 per cent have institutionalised most elements of IWRM (“medium-low”), 20 per cent are generally implementing most elements of IWRM in long-term programmes (“medium-high”), and 20 per cent are generally achieving policy objectives (“very high” and “high” implementation). The 60 per cent of countries in the very low, low and medium-low categories are unlikely to meet the global target unless implementation is accelerated. Collective action that builds on the multi-stakeholder monitoring and reporting processes is needed to set national targets to accelerate water resources development and management in a sustainable and equitable way.


Measuring Progress Report 2019


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116  |  Page 117  |  Page 118  |  Page 119  |  Page 120  |  Page 121  |  Page 122  |  Page 123  |  Page 124  |  Page 125  |  Page 126  |  Page 127  |  Page 128  |  Page 129  |  Page 130  |  Page 131  |  Page 132  |  Page 133  |  Page 134  |  Page 135  |  Page 136