search.noResults

search.searching

dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
Funding for capacity building (SDG 17.9.1) Change in a positive direction


Dollar value of financial and technical assistance (including through North-South, South-South and triangular cooperation) committed to developing countries.


12000.00 14000.00 16000.00


10000.00


2000.00 4000.00 6000.00 8000.00


0.00 Years Africa


Central America Southern Europe Asia


Western Asia Latin America and the Caribbean Sub-Saharan Africa Southern Asia


Source: UNSD 2016 Tier I; Custodian agency: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)


Sub-Saharan Africa was the biggest recipient of the net ODA in 2016, accounting for more than 28 percent of ODA receipts. Total ODA specifically allotted for capacity-building and national planning amounted to $20.4 billion, of which Latin America and the Caribbean received $5.1 billion, Sub-Saharan Africa received $4.6 billion, and Southern Asia received $3.8 billion. The three main sectors assisted were the environment, energy, and public administration, which received a combined $10.2 billion (ECOSOC 2018). However, the share of ODA allocated for statistical capacity-building remains low, despite growing demands. This amount represents approximately only 0.3 percent of the total ODA, a percentage far less than what is necessary for countries in developing regions to implement and monitor their development agendas (UN 2018c); and more specifically to overcome the challenges faced in the implementation and monitoring of the environmental dimension of the SDGs. Continued and increased technical and financial support is needed to ensure implementation of effective and targeted capacity-building in developing countries to support national plans to achieve all the SDGs.


Mechanisms for enhancing policy coherence (SDG 17.14.1) No data available


Number of countries with mechanisms in place to enhance policy coherence of sustainable development.


Korea, Republic of Japan


Luxembourg Czech Republic United States Switzerland Slovakia Poland Greece


United Kingdom Portugal


New Zealand Australia Canada Germany Belgium Austria Spain Ireland Italy


Hungary


Netherlands France


Denmark Sweden Norway Finland


0 Aid Finance 1 2


Technology Environment


3 4


Trade Security


Source: UNCTAD 2015 Tier III; Custodian agency: United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP)


Enhancing policy coherence for sustainable development is important for achieving sustainable development in its three dimensions (economic, social and environmental) in a balanced and integrated manner; for ensuring coherence between policies at various levels of government; for ensuring that policies in different sectors are mutually supportive and do not work against each other; and for addressing the impacts of domestic policy internationally. Even though no comparable data on existing mechanisms are available today, many countries already have a wide variety of mechanisms in place that enhance policy coherence for sustainable development. Examples of existing mechanisms include inter-ministerial coordination mechanisms, strategies on policy coherence for sustainable development, a commissioner for future generations, mechanisms allowing participation of relevant stakeholders, etc. Currently, the developed methodology consists of a framework for a composite indicator combining several sub-indicators including explanatory guidance notes per sub-indicator. This approach addresses the complexity and variety of mechanisms that exist in the countries.


104 Measuring Progress Report 2019 5 6 Migration 7


2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016


millions of 2016 United States dollars


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116  |  Page 117  |  Page 118  |  Page 119  |  Page 120  |  Page 121  |  Page 122  |  Page 123  |  Page 124  |  Page 125  |  Page 126  |  Page 127  |  Page 128  |  Page 129  |  Page 130  |  Page 131  |  Page 132  |  Page 133  |  Page 134  |  Page 135  |  Page 136