search.noResults

search.searching

saml.title
dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
96 FORMULATING


showing positive responses for surface roughness metrics (Spa and Spq).


Firmness and viscoelasticity Cutometer measurements demonstrated a tangible improvement in the skin’s biomechanical properties. At Day 84, the parameter Uf (final distension) decreased significantly by 11% (p<0.05). A decrease in Uf indicates that the skin


has become more resistant to mechanical deformation, an indication for improved firmness. Concurrently, the ratio Uv/Ue (viscoelasticity rate) increased significantly by 25% (p<0.05), suggesting a restoration of the skin’s elastic component and a reduction of cutaneous laxity (Figure 2).


Complexion radiance and homogeneity The analysis of skin colour parameters provided insight into the product’s ability to enhance radiance. After just 14 days, there was a statistically significant increase in skin lightness (L*) (+0.84%) and the individual whitening angle (IWA°) (+0.63%), alongside a decrease in skin pigmentation degree (ITA°). This suggests a rapid onset of the ‘brightening’ effect and luminosity (Figure 3,4). By Day 84, a significant decrease in the b*


parameter (yellowness) was observed (-3.85%). Reducing the yellow component of the skin contributes significantly to the perception of a fresher, less dull complexion (Figure 3). Interestingly, the study noted a significant


decrease in contrast gloss (Gc) at both D14 (-2.75%) and D84 (-2.34%). This indicates a mattifying effect, where the visibility of oily shine is reduced, contributing to a more even and refined skin appearance. The instrumental data was corroborated by


high subject satisfaction. At the conclusion of the study (D84), 91% of subjects stated they would use the product again. The product was judged as ‘Good to Very Good’ for cosmetic acceptability and anti-ageing efficacy by 100% of the panel. Specifically, 88% of subjects agreed that their


skin looked smoother, and 81% agreed their skin looked more radiant.


Conclusion The stabilization of high-potency retinol represents a significant challenge in cosmetic formulation, one that liquid vehicles struggle to address effectively. Lyophilization technology offers a scientifically robust solution. By locking the active ingredient within a vitrified, solid-state matrix of mannitol, degradation pathways are thermodynamically arrested. The ‘Lyophilized Bead’ format not only ensures


the stability of the active until the moment of use but also enables the creation of preservative-free formulations that align with modern consumer expectations. The clinical data presented for Retin+ beads


validates this approach: the preservation of retinol potency translated directly into measurable clinical benefits, including significant skin smoothing, firming, and radiance enhancement over a 12-week period.


PERSONAL CARE MAGAZINE March 2026 Day 0 Mean ■ Day 14 Mean ■ Day 84 Mean ■


90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0


vs D0:


D14: +4.81% (S) D84: +4.75% (S)


70.09 vs D0:


D14: +0.63% (S) D84: +0.61% (S)


70.53 70.52


33.45


35.06


35.04


Pigmentation Angle (ITA)


Whiteness (IWA Newtone) Figure 3: Pigmentation angle (ITA) and individual whitening angle (IWA) at D0, D14 and D84 Day 0 Mean ■ Day 14 Mean ■ Day 84 Mean ■


80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0


vs D0:


D14: +0.84% (S) D84: +0.52% (NS)


61.48 62.00 61.80 vs D0:


D14: -0.87% (NS) D84: +0.55% (S)


vs D0:


D14: -1.76% (NS) D84: -3.85% (S)


13.66


13.54


13.73


16.35


16.06


15.72


Luminosity (L*)


Redness (a*) Figure 4: Luminosity, redness and yellowness at D0, D14 and D84


References 1. Joshi S, Jindal P, Gautam S et al. Mini review on the lyophilization: a basic requirement for formulation development and stability modifier. Assay Drug Dev Technol. 2025;23(4):180-94


2. Samyuktha A, Ramesh, Chandra Y, Penabaka V. A review of lyophilization. GSC Biol Pharm Sci. 2025;30(2):7-21.


3. Taldaev A, Pankov DI, Terekhov RP, Zhevlakova AK, Selivanova IA. Modification of the physicochemical properties of active pharmaceutical ingredients via lyophilization. Pharmaceutics. 2023;15(11):2607


4. Baheti A, Lokesh K, Bansal A. Excipients used in lyophilization of small molecules. J Excip Food Chem. 2010;1


PCM


5. Nowak D, Jakubczyk E. The freeze-drying of foods: the characteristic of the process course and the effect of its parameters on the physical properties of food materials. Foods. 2020; Oct


18;9(10):1488


6. Karel M, Fennema OR, Lund DB. Principles of food science: part II, physical principles of food preservation. New York: Marcel Dekker, Inc.; 1975


7. Yi Z, Yang M, Liu B. Stabilization of labile active ingredients in an oil-water emulsion cosmetics by freeze-drying. Cryoletters. 2023;44:76-9


8. Maggadani BP, Rahmayati R, Rukmana TI, Mulyadi CA. Retinol stability in anti-aging face serum post-opening period. Int J Appl Pharm. 2024


9. Chmykh YG, Nadeau JL. Characterization of retinol stabilized in phosphatidyl-choline vesicles with and without antioxidants. ACS Omega. 2020; Jul 10;5(29):18367-75


10. Luo WC, Beringhs A, Kim R, Zhang W, Patel S, Bogner R et al. Impact of formulation on the quality and stability of freeze-dried nanoparticles. Eur J Pharm Biopharm. 2021;169


www.personalcaremagazine.com


Yellowness (b*)


Mean Value


Mean Value


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104