search.noResults

search.searching

saml.title
dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
SKIN MICROBIOME 67 TNF-α (pg/mL)


10 8 6 4 2 0


CTR- CTR+ -32.6% * 1%


EquiBiotics LA + SLS


Figure 1: Anti-inflammatory activity: TNF-α expression in ex vivo test, ***p-value<0.001; **p-value<0.01; *p-value<0.05


an impaired barrier function of stratum corneum in sensitive skin facilitates to the penetration of irritants, resulting in marked cutaneous responses to otherwise harmless stimuli.11 It is precisely in this delicate circumstance


that Roelmi HPC introduces its own postbiotic cosmetic active ingredient. Ex vivo study on reconstructed human


epidermis EpiDerm™ with ELISA method, has demonstrated its efficacy in reducing inflammation, particularly crucial for reactive skin. Following inflammation induced by irritant


agent SLS, there was a notable decrease of 32.6% in TNF-α levels compared to the CTRL+ after 24 hours (Figure 1). The choice of this specific factor is due to its


nature. Tumour Necrosis Factor-alpha (TNF-α) is a protein, classified as a cytokine, that acts as a signaling molecule in the immune system. It plays a crucial role in regulating various biological processes, including inflammation, cell proliferation, and cell death (apoptosis). Although essential for a healthy immune


response, its excessive or chronic production is linked to numerous inflammatory and autoimmune diseases. Its expression is therefore directly related to the product’s anti-inflammatory activity. A second ex vivo study on reconstructed


human epidermis EpiDerm with TEWL method demonstrates is capability to prevent water loss, thus reducing the risk of dryness (after 24 hours),


50 40 30 20 10 0


CTR- CTR+ TEWL -15.9% *


1%


EquiBiotics LA + SLS


Figure 2: Integrity of the epithelial barrier: TEWL in ex vivo test, ***p-value<0.001; **p-value<0.01; *p-value<0.05


another very common fact in sensitive skin. To complete the tests on the anti-inflammatory


activity, a metagenomic analysis of the 16S rRNA gene was carried out always on reconstructed human epidermis EpiDerm. It was observed to effectively restore equilibrium after an oxidative stress induced by 30 µl H2


O2 . The results show a decrease of


Staphylococcus aureus and an increase in Lactobacillus abundance (Figure 3). The increased microbiological biodiversity


observed after applying the product is primarily due to the increase in Lactobacillus spp., an endogenous inhabitant of healthy skin. Therefore, L. acidophilus PBS067 preserves the overall structure of the skin microbiome, but some notable changes in the abundance of less common members have been observed. Paracoccus is recognized as a skin


symbiotic bacterium, representing the phylum Pseudomonas, while Acinetobacter species have demonstrated a protective effect against inflammation in the skin ecosystem. 1% of this specific postbiotic therefore appears to rebalance their abundances to values closer to baseline.


In vivo tests Baby skin is extremely delicate and sensitive. The dermis and epidermis of newborns are structurally and functionally immature compared to that of adults. All newborn skin is approximately 40-60% thinner than that of adults. The same is true for the


epidermis, which is approximately 20% thinner. Another important difference concerns


collagen fibres, which are also smaller than those of adults. However, the dermal-epidermal junction (DER) is similarly less mature. The anchoring structures between the dermis and epidermis, such as anchoring fibrils, are reduced, with large spaces between the connection points. These structural immaturities contribute to


poor barrier function, making newborns more susceptible to increased transepidermal water loss (TEWL) and a greater risk of irritation. A clinical trial on 22 children between


the ages of 3 and 36 months (Figure 4) has been performed. Treatment and evaluation were directed and supported by an expert dermatologist over a period of zero, three and seven days. The tested formula incorporates 1% of


postbiotics and was evaluated on skin erythema. The results at T7 demonstrated a significant action p-value<0.001, allowing a reduction in the score scale from approximately 2.5, therefore moderate, to approximately 1.5, therefore mild. The erythema was reduced in 77.3% of subjects after seven days. To support these data, a photographic


evaluation (Figure 5) with a digital reflex was carried out on the same subjects at T0, T3, and T7. The images reported below clearly show a reduction in redness on the cheeks of the children photographed already at T3. To complete the test, a parental questionnaire


Microbiome composition at T48h - C - vs. C+ vs. EquiBiotics LA


CTR+ CTR-


0% 10% 20% 30%


■ Cutibacterium ■ Unclassified_Actinobacteria ■ Unclassified_ Betaproteobacteria ■ Straphylococcus


40% 50%


■ Corynebacterium ■ Sphingomonas ■ Pseudomonas ■ Unclassified_Caryophanales


Figure 3: Rebalance of skin microbiota: Microbiome composition at T48h C- vs. C+ vs. Equibiotics LA www.personalcaremagazine.com March 2026 PERSONAL CARE MAGAZINE 60% 70% 80%


■ Micrococcus ■ Unclassified_Neisse ■ Moraxella ■ Lactobacillus


TBF-α pg/mL


TEWL (Ω)


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104