search.noResults

search.searching

saml.title
dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
SKIN MICROBIOME


71


Figure 1: Image of Labskin-S construct in culture


of an adult acne sufferer (a 26 year-old black female volunteer). A validated sampling method was used whereby a sterile stainless-steel ring was place against the cheek and 1mL of GS25 buffer (PH neutral saline solution with 0.1% mild detergent) added to the ring. The skin was gently agitated with a sterile


Perspex wand and the GS25 buffer containing the microbiome sample recovered to a sterile tube for transport. The microbiome sample was transferred to the York laboratories were the microbiome sample was recovered and transferred onto the


surface of Labskin-S constructs. The whole microbiome was cultured but


specific investigation was placed on Cutibacteria spp. As the bacteria responsible for an acne presentation when out of balance with the other constituents of the skin microbiome.


Experimental protocol Labskin-S constructs, consisting of a 1.1cm 2 surface area, were cultured to maturation with a 12-day air-liquid-interface to provide a dry top surface for microbiome and product


Colonise Labskin with Microbiome sample Uncolonised Labskin Negative Labskin Positive Labskin Test Item Labskin


Figure 2: Photograph of cheek area of the volunteer providing the skin microbiome sample


applications. Each Labskin-S construct was colonized with an equal amount of microbiome sample, except for the uncolonized controls. All incubations were performed at 37°C/ 5% CO2


.


The microbiome sample was allowed to establish on the surface of Labskin-S for 48 hours prior to application of the products. An uncolonized control (no microbiome) was used. A negative sample of Dulbecco’s phosphate buffered saline was used as this would have no impact on the Cutibacteria present in the microbiome sample. A known over-the-counter anti-acne


product containing 5% benzoyl peroxide was used as the positive control. Finally, the product that the volunteer was using to treat her acne used. This contained 2% succinic acid, 2% colloidal sulphur and 1% salicylic acid. The Labskin-S was incubated for a further 48 hours post application of the treatment groups.


Assessment Visual The constructs were imaged by light photography at each of the protocol stages.


Apply dPBS


Apply Positive control


Apply Test Item


Microbiology Selective agar media for Cutibacteria spp. was used to perform microbiology enumeration. Eight-millimetre punch biopsies were used to take full thickness samples though the Labskin-S constructs. The microbiome sample was recovered using GS25 buffer and serial dilutions plated out onto selective agar.11


Sampling for:


Sampling for: IL-1α


Microbial enumeration Histology IL-1α


Figure 3: Protocol overview showing the timeline of the experimental procedure www.personalcaremagazine.com


Immunological The culture media from each construct well was assessed for the presence of Il-1α using a commercially available ELISA kit (RnD Systems). Il-1a is a pro-inflammatory cytokine and is used as a key marker for irritation in the skin. Keratinocyte cells are able to release


November 2025 PERSONAL CARE


Incubate for˜72h


Incubate for 48h


Incubate for 48h


Incubate for 48h


Incubate for 48h


Incubate for 48h


Incubate for 48h


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107