search.noResults

search.searching

saml.title
dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
66 EMULSIONS


butter has a higher likelihood of crystallizing than shea olein.


Visual inspection and pH The pH remained between 5.2 and 5.3 throughout the study, with no visual changes observed. The emulsions were stable under the tested conditions.


X-ray


XRD identified crystallization. Formulation A, with only Lipex SheaLiquid TR, showed no crystal peaks at any storage temperature (Figure 1). Therefore, the identified peaks are attributed to the addition of Lipex 102, which increased crystallinity. In the short-spacing for all emulsions,


including Formulation A, a broad area was observed, representing the emulsifier system to the greatest extent.15


In this study, a liquid


polyglucoside ester was used. A crystalline glucoside ester would have produced distinct peaks along with an amorphous area.16 Both WAXS (short space) and SAXS (long


space) characterized crystallization. Long space responses showed distinct peaks for triple chain (3L) and double chain (2L) packing, while short space peaks were weaker. Formulation B showed no crystallization


at 25°C. At 20°C, crystallization appeared after three months in the long spacing area (d-spacing of 44 Å), indicating double packing. The short spacing peak was too weak to determine the polymorphic form. At 20°C, formulations C and D showed


crystallization peaks after one week, with d-spacings of 3.9, 4.2, 34, 45, and 69 Å, indicating triple chain SOS in the beta prime phase.17 Tristearin in the beta phase crystallizes in double chain packing with a chain length of 45 Å.18


At


25°C, formulation C showed crystallization after one month (d-spacing of 45 Å) (Figure 2). Formulation D, with the highest Lipex 102,


showed double chain packing at 45 Å after one week, growing throughout the period. The 3-L packing appeared after three months.


Formulation A


■ 3 Months at 25°C


■ 3 Months at 20°C


■ Time Zero 0.100 1.000 10.000 Formulation B


■ 3 Months at 25°C


■ 3 Months at 20°C


■ Time Zero 0.100 1.000 10.000 100.000µm 0.1


Figure 4: Droplet size distribution. X-axis Droplet size (µm). Day 0 in the bottom and 3 months storage at 20 and 25 °C respectively at the top


PERSONAL CARE November 2025 1 10 100 100.000µm 0.1 1 10 100 Formulation C at 25°C


■ Months 3 ■ Months 1 ■ Week 1 ■ Day 1 ■ Time Zero


0.1 1 10 100 100.00 10.00 1.00 100.00 10.00 1.00


Figure 2: XRD for formulations C and D. Merged SAXS/WAXS diagrams where the x-axis represents the d-spacing for formulations C and D at 20 and 25°C. Day 0 in the bottom and 3 months storage at 20°C at the top. The X-axis shows distance in Angstrom


Formulation A■ Formulation B ■ Formulation C ■ Formulation D ■


18 16 14 12 10 8 6 4 2 0


-2 0.1 1 10 100 µm Figure 3: Particle size distribution. X-axis Particle size distribution (µm) for the freshly made formulations


Droplet size measurements On day one, all emulsions showed a monodisperse droplet size distribution, ranging from 1.4 to 2.1 µm (Figure 3). At 20°C and 25°C, formulations A and B


remained monodisperse. Formulation A’s droplet size was 1.5 µm initially and remained stable.


Formulation C at 20°C


■ Months 3 ■ Months 1 ■ Week 1 ■ Day 1 ■ Time Zero


1000µm 0.1 1 10 Formulation D at 25°C


■ Months 3 ■ Months 1 ■ Months 1 ■ Day 1 ■ Time Zero


1000µm


Figure 5: Droplet size distribution. X-axis Droplet size (µm). Day 0 in the bottom and three months storage at 20°C at the top


www.personalcaremagazine.com 100


Formulation B started at 1.9 µm and ended at 1.8 µm (20°C) and 1.7 µm (25°C) (Figure 4). Formulations C and D transitioned from monodisperse to polydisperse systems at both 20°C and 25°C (Figure 5). Formulation C started with a droplet size of 1.7 µm and developed a two-domain system (21.8 µm) at 20°C after


Formulation D at 20°C


■ Months 3 ■ Months 1 ■ Week 1 ■ Day 1 ■ Time Zero


1000µm 100.00 10.00 Formulation C at 25°C 1.00 100.00 10.00 Formulation D at 25°C 1.00 Formulation C at 20°C


■ Month 3 ■ Month 1 ■ Week 1 ■ Day 1 ■ Day 0 Formulation D at 20°C


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107