1206 Elena Ruggeri et al.
GALLI, C., COLLEONI, S., DUCHI, R., LAGUTINA,I.&LAZZARI, G. (2013). Equine assisted reproduction and embryo technologies. Anim Reprod 10, 334–343.
GALLI, C., DUCHI,R., COLLEONI,S., LAGUTINA,I.&LAZZARI,G.(2014). Ovum pick up, intracytoplasmic sperminjection and somatic cell nuclear transfer in cattle, buffalo and horses: From the research laboratory to clinical practice. Theriogenology 81(1), 138–151.
GILCHRIST, R.B. & THOMPSON, J.G. (2007). Oocyte maturation: Emerging concepts and technologies to improve developmental potential in vitro. Theriogenology 67(1), 6–15.
GRONDAHL, C., HANSEN, T.H., HOSSAINI, A., HEINZE, I., GREVE,T.& HYTTEL, P. (1997). Intracytoplasmic sperm injection of in vitro- matured equine oocytes. Biol Reprod 57(6), 1495–1501.
GRONDAHL,C. &HYTTEL, P. (1996). Nucleologenesis and ribonucleic acid synthesis in preimplantation equine embryos. Biol Reprod 55(4), 769–774.
HINRICHS, K. (1991). The relationship of follicle atresia to follicle size, oocyte recovery rate on aspiration, and oocyte morphology in the mare. Theriogenology 36(2), 157–168.
HINRICHS, K. (2013). Assisted reproduction techniques in the horse. Reprod Fertil Dev 25(1), 80–93.
HINRICHS, K., SCHMIDT, A.L., FRIEDMAN, P.P., SELGRATH, J.P. & MARTIN, M.G. (1993). In vitro maturation of horse oocytes: Characterization of chromatin configuration using fluorescence microscopy. Biol Reprod 48(2), 363–370.
HYTTEL, P., FAIR, T.,CALLESEN,H.&GREVE, T. (1997). Oocyte growth, capacitation and final maturation in cattle. Theriogenology 47(1), 23–32.
LAZZARI, G., WRENZYCKI, C., HERRMANN, D., DUCHI, R., KRUIP, T., NIEMANN,H.&GALLI, C. (2002). Cellular and molecular deviations in bovine in vitro-produced embryos are related to the large offspring syndrome. Biol Reprod 67(3), 767–775.
LEEMANS, B., GADELLA, B.M., STOUT, T.A.,DE SCHAUWER, C.,NELIS, H., HOOGEWIJS,M. & VAN SOOM, A. (2016). Why doesn’t conventional IVF work in the horse? The equine oviduct as a microenvironment for capacitation/fertilization. Reproduction 152(6), R233–R245.
LONERGAN,P.&FAIR, T. (2016). Maturation of oocytes in vitro. Annu Rev Anim Biosci 4, 255–268.
MAMO, S., CARTER, F., LONERGAN, P., LEAL, C.L., AL NAIB, A., MCGETTIGAN, P., MEHTA, J.P., EVANS, A.C. & FAIR, T. (2011). Sequential analysis of global gene expression profiles in immature and in vitro matured bovine oocytes: Potential molecular markers of oocyte maturation. BMC Genom 12, 151.
MANANDHAR,G. & TOSHIMORI, K. (2003). Fate of postacrosomal perinuclear theca recognized by monoclonal antibody MN13 after sperm head microinjection and its role in oocyte activation in mice. Biol Reprod 68(2), 655–663.
MARCHETTI, F., BISHOP, J., GINGERICH,J.&WYROBEK, A.J. (2015). Meiotic interstrand DNA damage escapes paternal repair and causes chromosomal aberrations in the zygote by maternal misrepair. Sci Rep 5, 7689.
MARCHETTI,F. &WYROBEK, A.J. (2005).Mechanisms and consequences of paternally-transmitted chromosomal abnormalities. BirthDefects Res C Embryo Today 75(2), 112–129.
MESSINGER, S.M. & ALBERTINI, D.F. (1991). Centrosome and microtubule dynamics during meiotic progression in the mouse oocyte. J Cell Sci 100(Pt 2), 289–298.
MOGHBELINEJAD, S., MOZDARANI,H. & REZAEIAN, Z. (2013). The rates of premature chromosome condensation and embryo development after injection of irradiated sperms into hamster oocytes. Iran J Reprod Med 11(5), 391–398.
REIK, W., DEAN,W. &WALTER, J. (2001). Epigenetic reprogramming in mammalian development. Science 293(5532), 1089–1093.
RINAUDO,P. & SCHULTZ, R.M. (2004). Effects of embryo culture on global pattern of gene expression in preimplantation mouse embryos. Reproduction 128(3), 301–311.
ROSENBUSCH, B. (2001). Digynic triploidy: Possible mechanisms. Prenat Diagn 21(3), 234.
SANFINS, A., PLANCHA, C.E. & ALBERTINI, D.F. (2015). Pre- implantation developmental potential from in vivo and in vitro matured mouse oocytes: A cytoskeletal perspective on oocyte quality. J Assist Reprod Genet 32(1), 127–136.
SCHMIADY, H., TANDLER-SCHNEIDER,A.&KENTENICH, H. (1996). Premature chromosome condensation of the sperm nucleus after intracytoplasmic sperm injection. Hum Reprod 11(10), 2239–2245.
SLUDER, G., THOMPSON, E.A., MILLER, F.J., HAYES,J. & RIEDER, C.L. (1997). The checkpoint control for anaphase onset does not monitor excess numbers of spindle poles or bipolar spindle symmetry. J Cell Sci 110(Pt 4), 421–429.
SMITZ, J.E., THOMPSON, J.G. & GILCHRIST, R.B. (2011). The promise of in vitro maturation in assisted reproduction and fertility preservation. Semin Reprod Med 29(1), 24–37.
SQUIRES, E., CARNEVALE, E., MCCUE,P.&BRUEMMER, J. (2003). Embryo technologies in the horse. Theriogenology 59(1), 151–170.
SUTTON, M.L., GILCHRIST, R.B. & THOMPSON, J.G. (2003). Effects of in-vivo and in-vitro environments on the metabolism of the cumulus-oocyte complex and its influence on oocyte developmental capacity. Hum Reprod Update 9(1), 35–48.
TREMOLEDA, J.L., VAN HAEFTEN, T., STOUT, T.A., COLENBRANDER,B.& BEVERS,M.M. (2003). Cytoskeleton and chromatin reorganization in horse oocytes following intracytoplasmic sperm injection: Patterns associated with normal and defective fertilization. Biol Reprod 69(1), 186–194.
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36 |
Page 37 |
Page 38 |
Page 39 |
Page 40 |
Page 41 |
Page 42 |
Page 43 |
Page 44 |
Page 45 |
Page 46 |
Page 47 |
Page 48 |
Page 49 |
Page 50 |
Page 51 |
Page 52 |
Page 53 |
Page 54 |
Page 55 |
Page 56 |
Page 57 |
Page 58 |
Page 59 |
Page 60 |
Page 61 |
Page 62 |
Page 63 |
Page 64 |
Page 65 |
Page 66 |
Page 67 |
Page 68 |
Page 69 |
Page 70 |
Page 71 |
Page 72 |
Page 73 |
Page 74 |
Page 75 |
Page 76 |
Page 77 |
Page 78 |
Page 79 |
Page 80 |
Page 81 |
Page 82 |
Page 83 |
Page 84 |
Page 85 |
Page 86 |
Page 87 |
Page 88 |
Page 89 |
Page 90 |
Page 91 |
Page 92 |
Page 93 |
Page 94 |
Page 95 |
Page 96 |
Page 97 |
Page 98 |
Page 99 |
Page 100 |
Page 101 |
Page 102 |
Page 103 |
Page 104 |
Page 105 |
Page 106 |
Page 107 |
Page 108 |
Page 109 |
Page 110 |
Page 111 |
Page 112 |
Page 113 |
Page 114 |
Page 115 |
Page 116 |
Page 117 |
Page 118 |
Page 119 |
Page 120 |
Page 121 |
Page 122 |
Page 123 |
Page 124 |
Page 125 |
Page 126 |
Page 127 |
Page 128 |
Page 129 |
Page 130 |
Page 131 |
Page 132 |
Page 133 |
Page 134 |
Page 135 |
Page 136 |
Page 137 |
Page 138 |
Page 139 |
Page 140 |
Page 141 |
Page 142 |
Page 143 |
Page 144 |
Page 145 |
Page 146 |
Page 147 |
Page 148 |
Page 149 |
Page 150 |
Page 151 |
Page 152 |
Page 153 |
Page 154 |
Page 155 |
Page 156 |
Page 157 |
Page 158 |
Page 159 |
Page 160 |
Page 161 |
Page 162 |
Page 163 |
Page 164 |
Page 165 |
Page 166 |
Page 167 |
Page 168 |
Page 169 |
Page 170 |
Page 171 |
Page 172 |
Page 173 |
Page 174 |
Page 175 |
Page 176 |
Page 177 |
Page 178 |
Page 179 |
Page 180
