search.noResults

search.searching

note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
Nucleation and Growth of Mg-Calcite Spherulites 1191


double-distilled water and dropped onto a copper mesh. The dried sample was stained with phosphotungstic acid for 30 s, and dried before being submitted to TEMimaging. Precipitates collected by centrifugation were analyzed using an EVO 18 scanning electron microscopy (SEM) instrument (ZEISS, Jena, Germany) equipped with an energy dispersive spectro- scope (EDS) for imaging minerals. Dried samples were coated with 8nm of gold before undergoing SEM imaging. Samples were further investigated by TEM and selected area electron diffraction (SAED) using a Tecnai electron microscope (FEI Co., Hillsboro, OR, USA). Phase characterization of the pre- cipitates was determined using a D/max-B (III) X-ray diffrac- tion (XRD) with Cu-Kα radiation. The scan rate of 0.01°/s was applied to record the patterns in the 2θ range between 10° and 60° at 35kV and 20mA. Qualitative identification of mineral phases was performed using the Jade 5.0 program. IR spectra were measured on a Bruker Vector-22 Fourier transform infrared (FT-IR) spectrometer at room temperature.


RESULTS AND DISCUSSION


Strain HJ-1 grew well during the 50 day biotic experiments, and the cell density increased rapidly in the initial stages and reached a maximum on day 10 (6.0×109 cfu/mL), then decreased slowly thereafter (Fig. 2). In the meantime, the turbidity of the solution increased noticeably upon con- tinued incubation, indicating fewer particles present in the


suspension as time proceeded. Precipitation then occurred gradually, and large quantities of solid material adhered to the bottle wall. By contrast, no precipitate was formed in the abiotic (control) experiments. Thus, strain HJ-1 was essential for inducing calcite precipitation in this system. Strain HJ-1 appeared to alter the physicochemical parameters of the system to promote carbonate precipitation. In contrast with abiotic experiments, in biotic experiments, bacterial respiration and degradation of organic matter by bacteria result in the release of CO2 and NH3, and released ammonia increased the pH, which increased carbonate ions in the culture medium, as indicated by the following equilibria: CO2(g)+H2O(l)↔H2CO3(aq)↔HCO3(aq)


+2H(aq) + . As expected, carbonate precipitation occurred


− +H(aq) + ↔CO3(aq)


in the presence of Ca2+ ions as soon as the culture medium became supersaturated. Furthermore, the bacteria cell wall contains a number of negatively charged surface functional groups, such as hydroxyls, carboxyls, and phos- phates, and bacterial EPS, which includes carboxylic and amino functional groups, are also known to have a high Ca2+/Mg2+-binding capacity, and to serve as nucleation templates for carbonate particles (Rodriguez-Navarro et al., 2007). Analysis of XRD patterns confirmed that the precipitates


present between days 30 and 50 were pure Mg-calcite. Since XRD patterns of precipitates obtained during the early stages of the experiment displayed no obvious diffraction peaks, TEM analysis was also carried out. Figure 3 shows a representative TEM image of these precipitates and the corresponding SAED pattern of early aggregates, which could be indexed as amorphous calcium carbonate (ACC) phases, conforming their status as mature Mg-calcite particles derived from ACC. Analysis of Mg-calcite samples from day 30 to day 50 by SEM revealed the coexistence of hemi-spherulites and spherulites, which accounted for more than 90% of precipitates with differ- ent morphologies (Fig. 4). Fragments of Mg-calcite spherulites can be used to investigate the interior structure of these crystals, and the results implied that the spherulites may be composed of a nucleus surrounded by numerous needle-like subunits. As shown in Figure 4, the outer surface of spherulites


Figure 2. Growth curve of strain HJ-1 in M2 liquid media.


and the bottom surface of hemi-spheruliteswere consistently covered by a film layer. Interestingly, we serendipitously


2−


Figure 3. Transmission electron microscopy image (a) and corresponding selected area electron diffraction pattern (b) of solid precipitates on day 10. The diffuse rings correspond to amorphous calcium carbonate.


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116  |  Page 117  |  Page 118  |  Page 119  |  Page 120  |  Page 121  |  Page 122  |  Page 123  |  Page 124  |  Page 125  |  Page 126  |  Page 127  |  Page 128  |  Page 129  |  Page 130  |  Page 131  |  Page 132  |  Page 133  |  Page 134  |  Page 135  |  Page 136  |  Page 137  |  Page 138  |  Page 139  |  Page 140  |  Page 141  |  Page 142  |  Page 143  |  Page 144  |  Page 145  |  Page 146  |  Page 147  |  Page 148  |  Page 149  |  Page 150  |  Page 151  |  Page 152  |  Page 153  |  Page 154  |  Page 155  |  Page 156  |  Page 157  |  Page 158  |  Page 159  |  Page 160  |  Page 161  |  Page 162  |  Page 163  |  Page 164  |  Page 165  |  Page 166  |  Page 167  |  Page 168  |  Page 169  |  Page 170  |  Page 171  |  Page 172  |  Page 173  |  Page 174  |  Page 175  |  Page 176  |  Page 177  |  Page 178  |  Page 179  |  Page 180