search.noResults

search.searching

dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
May, 2017 Setting the Standard for


Tray-Rated Fiber Optic Cable Continued from previous page


tic (PVC or polyurethane) to cables with dual jackets, one of which is in- terlocked armor. Within these outer jackets, fiber


optic components vary from individ- ual to multi-fiber subunits. Miller says the new bench-


marks are designed to eliminate con- fusion and misconceptions about is- sues such as outer jacketing. He points to the example of a dual-jack- et with interlocked armor. While this may sound like the ideal option, the crush rating can be lower than for a non-armored product. This is, in part, due to the fact


that any crimps or indents in the in- terlocked armor caused during in- stallation can leave a permanent spot for ongoing attenuation issues. In this case, a non-armored product may provide greater durability at a lower cost per foot. Also affecting durability is how


the fibers are contained within the jacketing. For typical outdoor or long-run distribution cable, loose- tube, gel-filled construction is popu- lar and low in cost. In this type of cable, the fibers are contained in small, rigid tubes, and generally flooded with gel or a powder as a water-blocking agent. Although acceptable for use in


more benign environments, loose- tube cabling tends to be relatively stiff and delivers a lower crush rat- ing, bend radius, and less overall pro- tection of fiber strands than more ruggedized options. In addition, with this type of cable, the gel or powder


must first be cleaned off before termi- nations or splices are made. However, some manufacturers


offer ruggedized, tight-buffered alter- natives to meet the requirements of the harshest environments. As op- posed to loose-tube designs, which only have one thin coating surround- ing each optical fiber, ruggedized tight-buffered fibers have two. These options also provide for


direct termination of fibers, which re- duces the mess, expense of installa- tion and eliminates steps and mate- rials required. In the case of Optical Cable Cor-


poration products, ruggedness is in- creased through the use of a pres- sure-extruded or tightly-bound outer jacket that firmly binds all the fibers together so that the cable moves as a single, solid unit. This core-locked outer jacket is


available on the company’s FOTC family of products, which include break-out, riser-rated, multiple sub- cable, high-density, and high fiber count options. “As an industry, it is important


we provide consulting engineers, con- tractors, and installers with options that are third-party-verified and meet defined standards,” says Miller. “That way, every cable will meet, or exceed, the performance require- ments if it is labeled tray-rated.” Contact: Optical Cable Corp.,


5290 Concourse Drive, Roanoke, VA 24019 % 800-622-7711 fax: 540-265-0724 E-mail: info@occfiber.com Web: www.occfiber.com r


1 3/2/17 1:02 PM 


 


AC-DC DC-DC


INVERTERS CHARGERS DESKTOP


WALL MOUNT


COMPETITIVE COST U.S.STOCKING


SCHEDULED ORDERS CTPAT CERTIFIED


WORLDWIDE SAFETY MEDICAL 3RD EDITION


www.total-power.com


Don’t See What You Need Online? Call Us, We Can Find It!


877-646-0900  LED DRIVERS


CUSTOM BUILDS VALUE ADDED MODIFIED STD ENERGY STAR


RoHS COMPLIANT


www.us-tech.com


Page 41





                           solidstateinc.com


Technical Support 24-Hour Shipment


Extensive Product Offering Just-In-Time Delivery


Franchised Distributor Value-Added Service


800.631.2075


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116