news analysis
Emerging markets to save sapphire substrates?
As sapphire substrate makers brace for a year of consolidation, 2013 could deliver the killer application.
WILL 2013 be a year of two halves for manufacturers of sapphire substrates? Overcapacity and falling substrates prices look set to trigger industry consolidation but emerging applications, including RF antenna switches and even smartphone display covers, could soften the blow.
“Right now it is very difficult for sapphire substrate makers to be profitable,” says Eric Virey, senior analyst for LED devices and materials at Yole Développement. “In the last couple of years we’ve seen lots of new entrants in the market. Demand for substrates has been increasing, but not as fast as capacity, so now prices are fairly low.”
As Virey points out, 2-inch wafer prices have reached rock bottom while prices have also plummeted for 4-inch wafers. “It’s still possible to make money on 6-inch wafers, but competition is increasing and market prices are also coming down; in most cases prices will be below $200 per wafer,” he adds. Slow substrate demand from LED manufacturers has also intensified market competition, and now, industry attrition and consolidation looks set to be the only way forward.
Virey expects new entrants from China,Taiwan and Korea will fall first. As he points out, around two years ago these players were quick to adopt turnkey crystal growth equipment developed by Eastern Europe manufacturers, despite having little if any experience of growing crystals.
“[Turnkey] equipment can produce high quality crystals, but still has a learning curve,” he says. “I’ve heard horror stories of companies getting very low yields... certainly a lot of early adopters in Taiwan and Korea struggled before getting yields right. So a lot of newcomers may disappear even before selling a single wafer.”
Virey also suspects more successful players will consolidate, despite qualifying crystals and ramping up production with a reasonable cost-structure. For example, Taiwanese wafer maker Sino-American Silicon Products (SAS) has already merged its sapphire substrate unit with Crystalwise Technology, and more of the same is expected from Taiwan as well as China and Korea.
But while sapphire substrate makers from the West watch events in the East unfold, surely all are scrutinising what the LED industry will do next. Today, more than 80 percent of LEDs are fabricated on sapphire substrates, but as LED manufacturers push the industry to produce 8-inch wafers and beyond, many are also eyeing silicon substrates with a view to fabricating LEDs on depreciated CMOS equipment and slashing manufacturing costs.
“I would say that pretty much every single tier one LED maker is carrying out research and
development into GaN on silicon. They simply can’t afford not to look at it,” says Virey. “But this doesn’t mean they have put silicon on their roadmaps.” With manufacturing yields for GaN on silicon still a challenge, an industry transition to silicon doesn’t yet make economical sense, and as Virey adds: “I’m also not expecting any impact from GaN-on-GaN in the short term... the price of substrates also needs to come down a little bit.”
However, as Virey is eager to point out, there is more to sapphire substrate manufacturing than LEDs. US-based Peregrine Semiconductor has already achieved vast success with its sapphire- based antenna switches (see p. 55). The company has shipped more than one billion silicon-on-sapphire RF switches, which have been have been designed into some of the most well-known smartphones, including the iPhone 4S. But while the company is now developing sapphire-based power amplifiers and tunable RF filters, which can only bode well for substrate makers, the best may be yet to come. The last year has seen a lot of excitement over the possible use of sapphire as a replacement for cover glass in mobile phones. Prototypes are reported to exist and if these reach the market place, the impact on the industry will be profound.
In 2012, the smartphone market reached nearly 0.9 billion units. Given a typical smartphone size of 65 cm2
, nearly 59 billion cm2 of
glass would have been used in smartphones in that year alone. If you take into account that in the same year the LED industry consumed a much smaller 970 million cm2
of sapphire, the impact
of a switch from glass to sapphire is clear. As Virey puts it: “Even a 5 percent adoption of sapphire in smartphone displays would have manufacturers demanding much larger volumes of sapphire than LED manufacturers. It’s too early to say what will happen, but I strongly believe by the end of this year we could start seeing some smartphone models using sapphire.”
© 2013 Angel Business Communications. Permission required.
January / February 2013
www.compoundsemiconductor.net 21
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36 |
Page 37 |
Page 38 |
Page 39 |
Page 40 |
Page 41 |
Page 42 |
Page 43 |
Page 44 |
Page 45 |
Page 46 |
Page 47 |
Page 48 |
Page 49 |
Page 50 |
Page 51 |
Page 52 |
Page 53 |
Page 54 |
Page 55 |
Page 56 |
Page 57 |
Page 58 |
Page 59 |
Page 60 |
Page 61 |
Page 62 |
Page 63 |
Page 64 |
Page 65 |
Page 66 |
Page 67 |
Page 68 |
Page 69 |
Page 70 |
Page 71 |
Page 72 |
Page 73 |
Page 74 |
Page 75 |
Page 76 |
Page 77 |
Page 78 |
Page 79 |
Page 80 |
Page 81 |
Page 82 |
Page 83 |
Page 84 |
Page 85 |
Page 86 |
Page 87 |
Page 88 |
Page 89 |
Page 90 |
Page 91 |
Page 92 |
Page 93 |
Page 94 |
Page 95 |
Page 96 |
Page 97 |
Page 98 |
Page 99 |
Page 100 |
Page 101 |
Page 102 |
Page 103 |
Page 104 |
Page 105 |
Page 106 |
Page 107 |
Page 108 |
Page 109 |
Page 110 |
Page 111 |
Page 112 |
Page 113 |
Page 114 |
Page 115 |
Page 116 |
Page 117 |
Page 118 |
Page 119 |
Page 120 |
Page 121 |
Page 122 |
Page 123 |
Page 124 |
Page 125 |
Page 126 |
Page 127 |
Page 128 |
Page 129 |
Page 130 |
Page 131 |
Page 132 |
Page 133 |
Page 134 |
Page 135 |
Page 136 |
Page 137 |
Page 138 |
Page 139 |
Page 140 |
Page 141 |
Page 142 |
Page 143 |
Page 144 |
Page 145 |
Page 146 |
Page 147 |
Page 148 |
Page 149 |
Page 150 |
Page 151 |
Page 152 |
Page 153 |
Page 154 |
Page 155 |
Page 156 |
Page 157 |
Page 158 |
Page 159 |
Page 160 |
Page 161 |
Page 162 |
Page 163 |
Page 164 |
Page 165 |
Page 166 |
Page 167 |
Page 168 |
Page 169 |
Page 170 |
Page 171 |
Page 172 |
Page 173 |
Page 174 |
Page 175 |
Page 176 |
Page 177 |
Page 178 |
Page 179 |
Page 180 |
Page 181 |
Page 182 |
Page 183 |
Page 184 |
Page 185 |
Page 186 |
Page 187 |
Page 188 |
Page 189 |
Page 190 |
Page 191 |
Page 192 |
Page 193 |
Page 194 |
Page 195 |
Page 196 |
Page 197 |
Page 198 |
Page 199 |
Page 200 |
Page 201 |
Page 202 |
Page 203 |
Page 204 |
Page 205 |
Page 206 |
Page 207 |
Page 208 |
Page 209 |
Page 210 |
Page 211 |
Page 212 |
Page 213 |
Page 214 |
Page 215 |
Page 216 |
Page 217 |
Page 218 |
Page 219 |
Page 220 |
Page 221 |
Page 222 |
Page 223 |
Page 224 |
Page 225 |
Page 226 |
Page 227 |
Page 228 |
Page 229 |
Page 230 |
Page 231 |
Page 232 |
Page 233