search.noResults

search.searching

saml.title
dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
TASTING Cockburn’s 1950


died in 1964. Substantial quantities are being sold at Christie’s in multiple lots over the next year. It was a great privilege to also be invited by the directors of Christie’s and Lord and Lady Barnard to attend a lunch at Raby Castle on April 25, 2024, the 50th anniversary of the revolution in Portugal. Sporting my red carnation (the symbol of the revolution), we tasted and then drank the wines, raising a toast to Portuguese liberty with Dow 1924, a wine made two years before the events that brought the Salazar regime (overthrown on April 25, 1974) to power. Staring out over the countryside of County Durham on a day of cold April showers and dappled sunlight, this is one the most magnificent Ports that I have ever tasted. The wines are listed in the order in which they were served. There was some bottle variation (to be expected with wines of this age), but it has to be emphasized that the wines were in perfect condition and demonstrated the staying power of Vintage Port if it is kept in the right place. There can be no better place to store Port than the cool, stone cellars of Raby Castle. 


This was not the most auspicious Port vintage. It was a challenging growing season redeemed by perfect conditions during the harvest itself. 1950 was declared by only a handful of shippers in difficult market conditions. Cockburn’s, then under the direction of John Smithes, had a rather idiosyncratic approach to vintages, but how right it was to declare this wine. It retains a mid-deep color, with a broad, browning rim. Quite restrained on the nose initially, with a bitter-cherry fruit emerging. Still relatively firm, all together, with lovely, linear (but not “lean” as Michael Broadbent claimed) if rather sinewy tannins all the way through to the finish. It isn’t powerful, but it is very elegant, with demure cherry-stone fruit just hiding behind the dusty/gravelly tannins. I have tasted this wine on a number of occasions, and this bottle was in perfect condition. To drink now and with a long drinking plateau ahead. | 96


Taylor’s 1948


The years after World War II were kind to Port (even if the markets weren’t), with some outstanding and fully declared vintages in 1945, 1947, and 1948. In 1948, the early summer was unusually hot, followed by a cool July and another blast of heat in August and September. The weather during harvest was hot, but crucially in these days before temperature control, the nights were cool. Sugar levels were high, and the wines were generally ripe and opulent. Taylor’s certainly reflects the natural richness of the vintage. Still deep in color for its age, with striking immediacy on the nose; exotic subtropical fruit akin to ripe pineapple. It is similarly voluptuous on the palate, with gloriously rich texture and mouthfeel mid-palate; the opulence of the fruit still masks the underlying structural, spicy tannins that emerge on a broad, ripe finish where both soft summer strawberries and pineapple freshness and tropicality leave their mark. This was not quite my favorite wine in the lineup, but it is an outstanding and thrilling Vintage Port nonetheless. | 99


Fonseca 1934


The years 1934 and 1935 were a so-called split vintage, and the consensus is that the latter year may just have the edge. The summer of 1934 was variable, but July was hot, and September rain helped swell the grapes before picking began toward the end of the month, a good two to three weeks later than the norm today. The harvest took place in near-perfect conditions. Having tasted Fonseca 1934 on a number of occasions, it is undoubtedly the pick of the vintage and as good as the best wines from 1935. Bottled by Hatch Mansfield, there was some bottle variation here, with wine from the first decanter seeming a bit dumb and dusty on the nose, while the second was more effusive, showing dark-chocolate intensity on the nose and some flesh on the palate. The soft berry fruit remains beautifully defined, supported by fine, linear tannins and cherry-stone freshness on the finish. Impressive and in perfect condition. | 98


Dow’s 1927


This was a monumental year for Port, declared by 30 shippers. It was one of those rare years that seemed to combine quantity and quality, the large crop taking time to ripen, and picking began only at the start of October. The wines were declared at the top of the market, shortly before the Wall Street Crash, and then proved slow to sell. When I first tasted a lineup of 1927s back in 1989, we had a discussion as to whether some of the wines were ready to drink (after 60 years in bottle at that time!). I think we can conclude that they are now ready but that you need to be in no hurry to drink. This was UK-bottled by Page & Sandeman, still retaining a wonderful rosy color, but there was some bottle variation, the wine from one decanter seeming a bit Bovril-like on the nose. The second was more restrained on the nose, with lovely rich, suave fruit on the palate backed by tight-knit, spicy/peppery tannins, still grippy and very fresh, with that firm, dryish finish that is so characteristic of Dow’s. | 98


Dow’s 1924


Tasting this on the 50th anniversary of Portugal’s Carnation Revolution, I had to pinch myself when I realized that this wine is now 100 years old. I have tasted this wine on a number of occasions, and it has always been impressive. This was perfection. The growing season in the Douro was cool but dry, the drought alleviated by September rain. Gordon Cosens of Silva & Cosens (the producer of Dow’s) concluded that 1924 “will prove to be a better than ordinary vintage.” So it has proved. This wine, bottled by Page & Sandeman, retains beautiful color and a glorious fragrance, with lovely berry fruit (“cranberries,” in the words of one fellow taster) and a classic floral character. Pristine freshness on the palate, with well-defined berry fruit, milk-chocolate richness, grippy tannins mid-palate, and a wonderfully complex finish. I picked up esteva (gum cistus), so evocative of the Douro and, unusually for Dow’s, a sense of subtropical richness and sweetness. This was not the biggest or boldest of the wines here but certainly the most complex and haunting, all in a very good and very remarkable way. | 100


THE WORLD OF FINE WINE | ISSUE 87 | 2025 | 89


Photography (left) © Peter is Shaw 1991 / Shutterstock; (right) courtesy of Richard Mayson


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116  |  Page 117  |  Page 118  |  Page 119  |  Page 120  |  Page 121  |  Page 122  |  Page 123  |  Page 124  |  Page 125  |  Page 126  |  Page 127  |  Page 128  |  Page 129  |  Page 130  |  Page 131  |  Page 132  |  Page 133  |  Page 134  |  Page 135  |  Page 136  |  Page 137  |  Page 138  |  Page 139  |  Page 140  |  Page 141  |  Page 142  |  Page 143  |  Page 144  |  Page 145  |  Page 146  |  Page 147  |  Page 148  |  Page 149  |  Page 150  |  Page 151  |  Page 152  |  Page 153  |  Page 154  |  Page 155  |  Page 156  |  Page 157  |  Page 158  |  Page 159  |  Page 160  |  Page 161  |  Page 162  |  Page 163  |  Page 164  |  Page 165  |  Page 166  |  Page 167  |  Page 168  |  Page 169  |  Page 170  |  Page 171  |  Page 172  |  Page 173  |  Page 174  |  Page 175  |  Page 176  |  Page 177  |  Page 178  |  Page 179  |  Page 180  |  Page 181  |  Page 182  |  Page 183  |  Page 184  |  Page 185  |  Page 186  |  Page 187  |  Page 188  |  Page 189  |  Page 190  |  Page 191  |  Page 192  |  Page 193  |  Page 194  |  Page 195  |  Page 196  |  Page 197  |  Page 198  |  Page 199  |  Page 200  |  Page 201  |  Page 202  |  Page 203  |  Page 204  |  Page 205  |  Page 206  |  Page 207  |  Page 208  |  Page 209  |  Page 210  |  Page 211  |  Page 212  |  Page 213  |  Page 214  |  Page 215  |  Page 216  |  Page 217  |  Page 218  |  Page 219  |  Page 220