Bruno Paillard 2009 Nec Plus Ultra and 2015 Assemblage: Beyond the Straits?
In the company of Alice Paillard, Simon Field MW enjoys the latest vintages of two very diff erent wines from the family Champagne house
ec plus ultra (rendered ne plus ultra in the Anglo-Saxon world) describes the ultimate, the perfect example—of Champagne, in this case. The words were inscribed on the Pillars of Hercules on either side of the Straits of Gibraltar, offering a stark warning to ancient mariners not to venture beyond the known world. There is nuanced resonance here because of Alice Paillard’s desire, with her eponymous cuvée, to “recreate the specific aromas that were once found in the finest Champagnes”; the rediscovery of what she describes as the “alchemy” of the past rather than an increasingly technical foray into the spectrum of infinite potential. A good, old-fashioned Champagne, in other words. Has she succeeded? The 2009 is only the ninth outing for the wine (in good company alongside ’08, ’04, ’03, ’02, ’99, ’96, ’95, and ’90) and is invariably one of
N TASTING
2015 Assemblage (58% Pinot Noir, 42% Chardonnay; disgorged November 2022; dosage 4.5g/l)
Crystalline pale lemon, with a hint of Chablisien green for good measure. The nose is forward and confi dent: blood orange, kumquat, strawberry, and cherry, with hints of cassis and pepper. Puppy fat generosity, very 2015, then a pleasing weave of orchard fruit, nougat, and soft spice. Plenty to be enthusiastic about. | 93–94
2009 Nec Plus Ultra (50% Pinot Noir, 50% Chardonnay; disgorged November 2022; dosage 4.5g/l)
Rarefi ed Welsh gold, with a pleasing iridescence and a cascade of playful bubbles. Reticent on the nose, statuesque, à la Rodin’s Thinker; not the faintest hint of oxidation, but with a little air, we welcome dried fruits and tobacco, with ginger, nutmeg, and sandalwood all evidenced; a touch of vanillin even after all these years. Hazelnut and clove, beeswax and jasmine… With time, the nuances of harmony all stake a claim for attention. Vinous grip and a resolute maturity; old-school—hence the Latin. | 95
the latest prestige cuvées to come to market, having in this instance enjoyed 12 years on its lees and then more than 18 months of post-disgorgement aging. “No two of the nine are alike,” she reveals —the ’08, for example, is built around its “energy”; the 2009 on its “depth.” The differences in vintage are, almost paradoxically, highlighted by what she describes as a “strict minimum in variation of the parameters of vinification.” The vintage is sacrosanct, in other words, and all other variables are merely pragmatic. Thus, there is always full malolactic fermentation, and the wine is always fermented in used barriques. Where there are differences, they are intended to highlight rather than challenge the personality of the vintage. In 2009, then, the Pinot Noir is shared equally between the grand cru villages of Verzenay, Mailly, and Bouzy (in 2008, Bouzy was favored); in 2009, unlike 2008, there is twice as much Chardonnay from Oger than from Mesnil. Otherwise, the template is constant. In terms of dosage, Alice is
characteristically incisive: “It’s a matter of attitude. Is the dosage used to bring a balance, or should it be the logical continuation of the character of the vintage? I try for the latter: 2008 was 3g/l, and the dosage was not used to ‘civilize’ the somewhat brutal energy of the vintage; rather, to accomplish it. 2009 is 4.5g/l and would probably have been delicious with 3g/l, but I didn’t wish to give this wine a smaller jacket to make it look thinner.” In other words, 2009 was solaire, warm and generous of temperament, and these natural attributes should not be challenged by a low dosage. The vintage is sacrosanct. When it comes to the next
wine, the Vintage Assemblage, Alice describes a “blank page”
(it might have been called Tabula Rasa in linguistic deference to its sibling), with far more scope for some of the variables mentioned above to come into play. Pragmatism, especially in the face of a difficult vintage such as this, is key— for example, in the selection of the fruit and the specific wines chosen for oak fermentation (only 25% for this wine). The picking date was vital in 2015, a year marked by both drought and humidity, when it was a real challenge to achieve physiological ripeness. Un binage vaut deux arrosages (“plowing once is the equal of watering twice”), Alice reminds us, implying that her vines are able to root deeply and to resist stress. There are no vegetal notes present in the final blend, which was harvested September 2–18 and is made up of 58% of Pinot Noir and 42% of Chardonnay. The wine has been aged on its lees for seven years and has also benefited from significant post- disgorgement aging. A work of art, as usual, adorns the label; this time the painting is the very well-named Elan (Enthusiasm), by Gérard Titus Carmel. Primary colors adorn this bright floral tribute. This is a happy wine. Two different styles, then, the 2015 majoring on fruit and exuberant power, and the 2009 NPU on a rich, vinous complexity. “Our ambition and dream with NPU,” concludes Alice, “is to create over the decades a library that will serve as a conservatory of the key vintages in Champagne.” It is fair to surmise that there is something very classic and traditional in the style of NPU (a tasting next to Dom Pérignon would be instructive) and that it does indeed recall some of the triumphs of the past. “So we beat on, boats against the current, borne back ceaselessly into the past.” I think Jay Gatsby would certainly have enjoyed the 2009 Nec Plus Ultra.
THE WORLD OF FINE WINE | ISSUE 87 | 2025 | 69
Photography courtesy of Bruno Paillard
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36 |
Page 37 |
Page 38 |
Page 39 |
Page 40 |
Page 41 |
Page 42 |
Page 43 |
Page 44 |
Page 45 |
Page 46 |
Page 47 |
Page 48 |
Page 49 |
Page 50 |
Page 51 |
Page 52 |
Page 53 |
Page 54 |
Page 55 |
Page 56 |
Page 57 |
Page 58 |
Page 59 |
Page 60 |
Page 61 |
Page 62 |
Page 63 |
Page 64 |
Page 65 |
Page 66 |
Page 67 |
Page 68 |
Page 69 |
Page 70 |
Page 71 |
Page 72 |
Page 73 |
Page 74 |
Page 75 |
Page 76 |
Page 77 |
Page 78 |
Page 79 |
Page 80 |
Page 81 |
Page 82 |
Page 83 |
Page 84 |
Page 85 |
Page 86 |
Page 87 |
Page 88 |
Page 89 |
Page 90 |
Page 91 |
Page 92 |
Page 93 |
Page 94 |
Page 95 |
Page 96 |
Page 97 |
Page 98 |
Page 99 |
Page 100 |
Page 101 |
Page 102 |
Page 103 |
Page 104 |
Page 105 |
Page 106 |
Page 107 |
Page 108 |
Page 109 |
Page 110 |
Page 111 |
Page 112 |
Page 113 |
Page 114 |
Page 115 |
Page 116 |
Page 117 |
Page 118 |
Page 119 |
Page 120 |
Page 121 |
Page 122 |
Page 123 |
Page 124 |
Page 125 |
Page 126 |
Page 127 |
Page 128 |
Page 129 |
Page 130 |
Page 131 |
Page 132 |
Page 133 |
Page 134 |
Page 135 |
Page 136 |
Page 137 |
Page 138 |
Page 139 |
Page 140 |
Page 141 |
Page 142 |
Page 143 |
Page 144 |
Page 145 |
Page 146 |
Page 147 |
Page 148 |
Page 149 |
Page 150 |
Page 151 |
Page 152 |
Page 153 |
Page 154 |
Page 155 |
Page 156 |
Page 157 |
Page 158 |
Page 159 |
Page 160 |
Page 161 |
Page 162 |
Page 163 |
Page 164 |
Page 165 |
Page 166 |
Page 167 |
Page 168 |
Page 169 |
Page 170 |
Page 171 |
Page 172 |
Page 173 |
Page 174 |
Page 175 |
Page 176 |
Page 177 |
Page 178 |
Page 179 |
Page 180 |
Page 181 |
Page 182 |
Page 183 |
Page 184 |
Page 185 |
Page 186 |
Page 187 |
Page 188 |
Page 189 |
Page 190 |
Page 191 |
Page 192 |
Page 193 |
Page 194 |
Page 195 |
Page 196 |
Page 197 |
Page 198 |
Page 199 |
Page 200 |
Page 201 |
Page 202 |
Page 203 |
Page 204 |
Page 205 |
Page 206 |
Page 207 |
Page 208 |
Page 209 |
Page 210 |
Page 211 |
Page 212 |
Page 213 |
Page 214 |
Page 215 |
Page 216 |
Page 217 |
Page 218 |
Page 219 |
Page 220
