search.noResults

search.searching

saml.title
dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
nouveau / liquid assets / preview / review


selection, 1227, has a long growing cycle, normally harvesting 15 days later than Beaujolais’s most common clones. Château de L’Éclair Gamay 1227 2022 (14% ABV), from a hot vintage, offered up floral, ripe, red-fruit/red-cherry/ black-cherry characters. Although full-bodied, its finely structured tannins and acidity countered any potential alcohol heaviness.


Gamay clone 1170 is a late ripener


from the Auvergne, selected specifically for climate mitigation. The 2022 Château de L’Éclair Gamay 1170 was comparatively more dampened aromatically, with blueberry fruits rather than the red fruits of the 1227, fuller-bodied, slicker, and more viscous, but firmer structured and more tannic. Only 12.5% ABV, its ample volume fooled me into thinking that it was more like 13.5–14%.


The institute’s two most promising Gamay-parented grapes are Gamaret and Gaminot. They bottle both commercially, offering a chance to taste several vintages of each alongside one another, with their own Gamay as control. Gamaret is a 1970s-era Swiss cross with Reichensteiner. An early ripener, with rot and fungal resistance, it leans toward spicy, blackberry-fruit characters and softish, mid-palate tannins. It’s already gained some traction, with several Beaujolais producers bottling their own versions.


Compared to Gamay, Valerie sees Gamaret as “always having more color, less acidity, very level tannins, but [the] sensation is small because [of the wine’s] thickness and volume in mouth.” Unexpectedly, given the super-hot vintage, the 2020 Gamaret de L’Éclair was 13.5% ABV, compared to the 2020 Gaminot at almost 16%. Quite sweetly fruited, with intense blackberries on the palate, it reminded me of Blaufränkisch but was slicker and more viscous, with softer, less rustic tannins. The 2022 Gamaret de L’Éclair (13% ABV), from a less hot year, was spicier and more floral, a touch coarser but clean and fresher than the 2020. Tasting it alongside the Gamay, I found the latter more floral, spicier, finer, and much more acidic. More compelling is SICAREX’s own 1980s crossing of Gamay with Pinot Noir: Gaminot. Officially listed in 2014, it is clearly viewed as an important grape in Beaujolais’s future. Lempereur described it as having the “fruitiness of Gamay and the delicacy of Pinot Noir.” Bertrand tips it as “a wine of the future” that handles “higher alcohol but with good levels of acidity.” So far, SICAREX is the only producer. The three vintages I tasted suggested a wide range of possibilities. The hottest—and perhaps most futuristic—was from a super-hot vintage, the 2020 Gamaret de L’Éclair, with a blazing 15.9% ABV and accompanying ultra-ripe, dried black-fruit characters.


Below (from left): A bunch of Gamaret; the garden at Château de L’Éclair; a harvester feeling the heat in Fleurie vineyards. Opposite: Netting to guard against hail, now a greater risk than ever.


Although mouth-filling and broadly structured, it had unexpectedly fine tannins, enough acidity, and quite good length. Most surprisingly, however, there was no perceptible alcoholic burn or whiffy spiritiness; a bit Gamay-gone- Shiraz-ish, but in a good way. I found the 2018 Gaminot de


L’Éclair more agreeable. From a cooler vintage, it was much better balanced, spicier, and more freshly fruited than the 2020; still quite full-bodied, but neatly cut through with fine acidity. A really nice wine. The 2023 Gaminot de L’Éclair (14% ABV) sat between the two stylistically. Tasted side by side with L’Éclair’s 2023 Gamay, it was spicier, brighter, and more lifted, with red-fruit aromas and flavors. Lighter-bodied, with a slick viscosity, it showed longer, finer-grained tannins. Relatively more transparent and linear than pure Gamay, its Pinot parentage showed through in spades. Again, I wouldn’t have picked it as being anywhere near 14% ABV. A classy wine. Given a choice between Burgundy’s


blended Passetoutgrains and Gaminot, I’d opt for Gaminot, because it seems a more complete, better-balanced, and better-integrated wine than a concoction of Pinot and Gamay. Tasting Gaminot versus Gamaret,


strong differences became very apparent. The former is more Pinot Noir-like aromatically and structurally, the latter more Syrah-like; maybe not bad options, given the regions Beaujolais sits between and possible future transitions.


26 | THE WORLD OF FINE WINE | ISSUE 87 | 2025


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116  |  Page 117  |  Page 118  |  Page 119  |  Page 120  |  Page 121  |  Page 122  |  Page 123  |  Page 124  |  Page 125  |  Page 126  |  Page 127  |  Page 128  |  Page 129  |  Page 130  |  Page 131  |  Page 132  |  Page 133  |  Page 134  |  Page 135  |  Page 136  |  Page 137  |  Page 138  |  Page 139  |  Page 140  |  Page 141  |  Page 142  |  Page 143  |  Page 144  |  Page 145  |  Page 146  |  Page 147  |  Page 148  |  Page 149  |  Page 150  |  Page 151  |  Page 152  |  Page 153  |  Page 154  |  Page 155  |  Page 156  |  Page 157  |  Page 158  |  Page 159  |  Page 160  |  Page 161  |  Page 162  |  Page 163  |  Page 164  |  Page 165  |  Page 166  |  Page 167  |  Page 168  |  Page 169  |  Page 170  |  Page 171  |  Page 172  |  Page 173  |  Page 174  |  Page 175  |  Page 176  |  Page 177  |  Page 178  |  Page 179  |  Page 180  |  Page 181  |  Page 182  |  Page 183  |  Page 184  |  Page 185  |  Page 186  |  Page 187  |  Page 188  |  Page 189  |  Page 190  |  Page 191  |  Page 192  |  Page 193  |  Page 194  |  Page 195  |  Page 196  |  Page 197  |  Page 198  |  Page 199  |  Page 200  |  Page 201  |  Page 202  |  Page 203  |  Page 204  |  Page 205  |  Page 206  |  Page 207  |  Page 208  |  Page 209  |  Page 210  |  Page 211  |  Page 212  |  Page 213  |  Page 214  |  Page 215  |  Page 216  |  Page 217  |  Page 218  |  Page 219  |  Page 220