search.noResults

search.searching

saml.title
dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
the great Hill of Hermitage will question the role of terroir there. There are, however, other equally valid perspectives, and Gago and Frey always had a very clear idea of what they were. The wine was always envisaged as a celebration of a grape variety and a style, rather than of a particular place or producer. As Gago puts it in the press release, “The blend’s raison d’être [is] one variety—reunited, reinterpreted, reassembled. Via one variety, this wine fuses two hemispheres and two winemaking cultures: France and South Australia, Syrah and Shiraz, La Chapelle and Grange.” Gago and Frey both felt that Cabernet Sauvignon has held the center-stage for rather too long and wanted to give Syrah/Shiraz a share of the limelight. (Grange normally has a little Cabernet, usually less than 8%.) And of course they wanted to produce a great new wine with its own distinct identity. Inevitably, some of those fortunate enough to spend time with the new baby will not be able to resist the temptation to try to see which features come from which parent. At the launch dinner, one Australian wine writer admitted to being baffled, even frustrated, in her attempt to discern which qualities came from the Grange and which from the Hermitage La Chapelle; while some in the French press are quite sure that the Australian parent brings less to the marriage and its offspring than the French: muscle and richness, for which it gets in return the higher virtues of elegance, freshness, and finesse.


While Gago recognizes this


temptation, he hopes that most of those who drink the wine will resist it—not least because he doubts it’s possible in taste terms. He would be the first to accept that the child has the DNA of both parents and that their personalities and qualities are vital. But he would also insist that they combine in complex ways to create a quite distinct individual. He points out that a parent with black hair and a parent with red hair may produce a blond child and that it is impossible to see the primary colors in all the others to which they give rise. He suspects that the tannins of the two parent wines combine to form quite different tannins; and the structure and texture of the new wine were the features that Frey singled out when I


Above: The cleverly designed, fittingly symmetrical label, the cross mirroring that on the chapel.


tasted it with the two of them in London. “There is a completely different texture and weight in the mouth,” she marveled. “I was afraid the wine might become hard, but in fact it has become very silky, in a quite distinct, even unique way.” This is the alchemy, the astonishing


transformation wrought in all successful blends, and a large part of their rationale. Even those blending components whose origins are much closer together—in the same single vineyard, like Jacques Devauges at Clos des Lambrays in Morey St-Denis, rather than multiple vineyards thousands of miles apart—testify to the blend being so much more than the sum of its parts. What we have in Grange La Chapelle is one plus one equaling one—but a different one. Or one plus one equaling three great wines. Even more than the distinct personality, it is the perfect harmony and sheer quality of the new wine that provide the best answer to the question “why?”


RRP of 75cl bottle is A$3,500 / €2,600; available in most key markets through appointed Penfolds agents or through grangexlachapelle.com 


TASTING 2021 Grange La Chapelle (14% ABV)


Tasted twice: in London on October 1, 2024, and in Paris on February 9, 2025. A deep purple-ruby to a thin, vibrant, crimson rim; opaque but not saturated, bright and shining. A captivating nose on both occasions, a fabulous aromatic weave; very elegant, fine, fresh, and focused, but effortless and floating, with graceful lift, the detail and intricacy already starting to show within the overall subtlety. Dark-fruited, with pure blackcurrant, blackberry, and mulberry, but neither raw nor roasted; beautifully integrated oak, barely perceptible as such, but perhaps contributing the light sandalwood and soft spice waft. With air, the spectrum widens, revealing more of the base notes, clean earth, licorice, even light resin (not eucalyptus), and more of the floral/mineral top notes (violets). Disarmingly silky entry, with exceptionally fine, chalk-dusty, gently supportive tannins; medium-bodied, perfectly paced, with a controlled energy and fluency. Almost racy; sleek, with great harmony, transparency, and vibrancy, remaining succulent throughout the elegant, persistent finish, which glides on and on. Although clearly very different, not only in terms of maturity, this was fully worthy of standing on the same table as the 1990 and 1978 La Chapelle, and the 1990 and 1971 Grange, which were also served at the launch dinner. 2030–50+. | 96–97


THE WORLD OF FINE WINE | ISSUE 87 | 2025 | 61


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116  |  Page 117  |  Page 118  |  Page 119  |  Page 120  |  Page 121  |  Page 122  |  Page 123  |  Page 124  |  Page 125  |  Page 126  |  Page 127  |  Page 128  |  Page 129  |  Page 130  |  Page 131  |  Page 132  |  Page 133  |  Page 134  |  Page 135  |  Page 136  |  Page 137  |  Page 138  |  Page 139  |  Page 140  |  Page 141  |  Page 142  |  Page 143  |  Page 144  |  Page 145  |  Page 146  |  Page 147  |  Page 148  |  Page 149  |  Page 150  |  Page 151  |  Page 152  |  Page 153  |  Page 154  |  Page 155  |  Page 156  |  Page 157  |  Page 158  |  Page 159  |  Page 160  |  Page 161  |  Page 162  |  Page 163  |  Page 164  |  Page 165  |  Page 166  |  Page 167  |  Page 168  |  Page 169  |  Page 170  |  Page 171  |  Page 172  |  Page 173  |  Page 174  |  Page 175  |  Page 176  |  Page 177  |  Page 178  |  Page 179  |  Page 180  |  Page 181  |  Page 182  |  Page 183  |  Page 184  |  Page 185  |  Page 186  |  Page 187  |  Page 188  |  Page 189  |  Page 190  |  Page 191  |  Page 192  |  Page 193  |  Page 194  |  Page 195  |  Page 196  |  Page 197  |  Page 198  |  Page 199  |  Page 200  |  Page 201  |  Page 202  |  Page 203  |  Page 204  |  Page 205  |  Page 206  |  Page 207  |  Page 208  |  Page 209  |  Page 210  |  Page 211  |  Page 212  |  Page 213  |  Page 214  |  Page 215  |  Page 216  |  Page 217  |  Page 218  |  Page 219  |  Page 220