search.noResults

search.searching

saml.title
dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
nouveau / liquid assets / preview / review


poured the 1978 Hermitage La Chapelle, and Max Schubert, who served the 1971 Grange (which he singled out as being his ideal vintage; see Huon Hook, WFW 8, pp.50–51); and even a bestselling book by Michel Dovaz, Fine Wines: Best Vintages Since 1900 (Assouline, 2009), where 1961 is represented by Hermitage La Chapelle, and 1962, by Grange. And Grange was, of course, labeled as nothing other than “Grange Hermitage” from the 1950s all the way through to 1989 (Bin 95 Grange tout court from 1990). Gago was always convinced that


the best Penfolds parent wine would be Grange—partly because of all the above associations, and partly because committing the most famous Penfolds wine would be the clearest, if also the riskiest, statement of complete conviction—even if Penfolds RWT Bin 798 might have seemed a contender, since it is matured, like Hermitage La Chapelle, in French rather than American oak. Nevertheless, he wanted to convince the Penfolds team, as well as the Frey team, by staging a tasting of blends using other Penfolds wines. And if he was convinced before the tasting that Grange would be best, he was still more so afterward—as they all were. As he says, “When things are real, all quickly becomes self-evident.” Gago and Frey were equally sure that a 50/50 blend of the two wines would be best—symbolically, in terms of an equal partnership, but also in terms of taste—which also proved to be the case, and which will be the rule from now on. Because the inaugural 2021 vintage is no one-off—not a Penfolds Special Bin, which might be a one-off—but is the first in what is intended to be a long line of annual releases, “Mother Nature permitting.” The 2022 is already in bottle, and the 2023 blended in barrel


Birth and early life However “natural” the marriage, though, the wine’s actual birth inevitably required some intervention from the midwives, because the logistical and practical challenges were considerable. For a start, the two parents—one from the southern hemisphere, one from the northern—were on the scene some six months apart. And the birth needed to be in Australia, because legally it could not be in France. (The wine has on the


60 | THE WORLD OF FINE WINE | ISSUE 87 | 2025


Gago and Frey always envisaged the wine as a celebration of a grape variety and a style, rather than of a particular place or producer. “The blend’s raison d’être: one variety— reunited, reinterpreted, reassembled”


back label, “Wine of France 50%. Wine of Australia 50%.”) Gago and Frey were both keen that the birth happen as soon as possible— but it would still need to be after the Hermitage La Chapelle had been through its malolactic. It was then air-freighted in barrel to Australia, to reduce the risks as far as possible, all the while being very carefully controlled and monitored for oxygen levels and temperature, with which Penfolds’ experience of other cross- continental blends proved beneficial. After the blending, the new wine went back into oak; the time it will spend there will vary with the vintage, but Gago supposes it will normally be between six and nine months. Half of the blend went into American oak that had already been “seasoned” with other Penfolds wine that year, so not completely new, and the other half of the blend into French oak, 15% of which had been seasoned in the same way. The Grange had already been in 100% new American oak, and the La Chapelle in 15% new French oak, so Gago reckons that the overall proportion of new wood is around 70%.


There was then the crucial question of how long the new wine should spend in wood, Gago being convinced that “the bottling date is as important as the picking date.” He therefore sent samples back to the Frey team so that they could decide together. Once the date had been settled, the wine was not fined but went through what Gago calls a very light “sticks and stones” filtration, before being bottled under cork and spending more time in bottle prior to release. (This period may also vary, but Gago thinks it will normally be between 12 and 18 months.)


A challenge of a different kind had


been keeping the marriage and birth a carefully guarded secret over several years, throughout the very detailed and protracted discussions between the two companies, involving the marketing, PR, and sales teams, as well as all of the winemakers. A few wine writers were let in on the secret and had an opportunity to meet the new baby in London in October 2024, during tastings for the ninth edition of Penfolds’ The Rewards of Patience. The official presentation was at a very spectacular dinner at La Monnaie de Paris on February 9, 2025. After the embargo was finally lifted, one of the articles to break the news was written by WFW columnist Nick Ryan, senior wine writer for The Australian, where the story made the front page under the headline, “Like a Beatles–Stones album, this wine marriage is made in heaven.”


Welcoming the wonder child Both of the parent companies were always aware that not everybody would welcome the new baby into the world so warmly. Frey accepted before the launch that “we will attract some criticism—every good new idea is criticized by some people. But I’m not afraid of that. I would be far more worried if we didn’t attract any criticism, which would suggest that the idea isn’t as original, as unique, as we believe it is.” And sure enough, some responded to the news by questioning the wine’s raison d’être (if not quite its right to exist). One UK wine writer (and doubtless others) asked on social media, “Why?” To which an obvious answer (and there are other much more positive ones) would be, “Why not?” After all, it’s not as if either parent wine will be diminished in anything other than quantity, unlike some new special cuvées, where an existing wine is compromised or sacrificed by having its heart and soul—be that derived from a particular lieu-dit or an old-vine parcel—removed. As with all blends— including Grange and Hermitage La Chapelle (the latter mainly now from lieux-dits Le Méal, Les Bessards, and Les Rocoules)—it may well be that the best perspective from which to view the new wine is not that of terroir, even though terroir operates on different levels, and nobody who has been on


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116  |  Page 117  |  Page 118  |  Page 119  |  Page 120  |  Page 121  |  Page 122  |  Page 123  |  Page 124  |  Page 125  |  Page 126  |  Page 127  |  Page 128  |  Page 129  |  Page 130  |  Page 131  |  Page 132  |  Page 133  |  Page 134  |  Page 135  |  Page 136  |  Page 137  |  Page 138  |  Page 139  |  Page 140  |  Page 141  |  Page 142  |  Page 143  |  Page 144  |  Page 145  |  Page 146  |  Page 147  |  Page 148  |  Page 149  |  Page 150  |  Page 151  |  Page 152  |  Page 153  |  Page 154  |  Page 155  |  Page 156  |  Page 157  |  Page 158  |  Page 159  |  Page 160  |  Page 161  |  Page 162  |  Page 163  |  Page 164  |  Page 165  |  Page 166  |  Page 167  |  Page 168  |  Page 169  |  Page 170  |  Page 171  |  Page 172  |  Page 173  |  Page 174  |  Page 175  |  Page 176  |  Page 177  |  Page 178  |  Page 179  |  Page 180  |  Page 181  |  Page 182  |  Page 183  |  Page 184  |  Page 185  |  Page 186  |  Page 187  |  Page 188  |  Page 189  |  Page 190  |  Page 191  |  Page 192  |  Page 193  |  Page 194  |  Page 195  |  Page 196  |  Page 197  |  Page 198  |  Page 199  |  Page 200  |  Page 201  |  Page 202  |  Page 203  |  Page 204  |  Page 205  |  Page 206  |  Page 207  |  Page 208  |  Page 209  |  Page 210  |  Page 211  |  Page 212  |  Page 213  |  Page 214  |  Page 215  |  Page 216  |  Page 217  |  Page 218  |  Page 219  |  Page 220